Jalen Cox
Colgate · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1010:48 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 34:51
- Points per game
- 18.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.3 / 5.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 18.4 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.1 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 2.3 |
| Season totals | 533 | 153 | 152 | 49 | 8 | 71 | 59 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 199–385 | 51.7% | 13.3 | 15.2 |
| 2P | 182–336 | 54.2% | 11.6 | 13.3 |
| 3P | 17–49 | 34.7%† | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| FT | 118–138 | 85.5% | 4.8 | 5.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.9% | 59.8% | 12.7% | 35.8% | 2.14 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Colgate · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Colgate: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Colgate | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.7 | +0.7 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.8 | -0.1 | +6.1range +5.5 to +6.6 | 3,139 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Colgate | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.4 | -0.4 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -0.4 | +3.8range +3.4 to +4.5 | 2,580 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Colgate | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.6 | -0.7 to +1.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +0.5 | +2.1range +1.6 to +2.7 | 2,203 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 36:26 | 34:51 | 11:54–42:52 | |
| Points | 21.8 | 18.4 | 4.0–38.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.7% | 56.8% | 28.6%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Lehigh | L 69–76 | 35:31 | 26 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8-19 | 1-4 | 9-10 | 44.7% |
| 2026-03-05 | Loyola Maryland | W 90–77 | 38:36 | 21 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-11 | 0-1 | 7-7 | 63.6% |
| 2026-02-25 | Lafayette | L 69–70 | 34:21 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-15 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 46.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Loyola Maryland | W 101–98 | 42:52 | 38 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11-15 | 2-3 | 14-15 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-16 | Boston U. | L 58–85 | 30:52 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4-14 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 28.6% |
| 2026-02-14 | Navy | L 80–84 | 41:42 | 30 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 9-16 | 1-1 | 11-12 | 59.4% |
| 2026-02-11 | Holy Cross | W 74–70 | 33:33 | 13 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6-17 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 35.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Bucknell | W 78–59 | 36:27 | 14 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-04 | Army West Point | W 69–55 | 29:56 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Lehigh | L 76–77 | 41:55 | 34 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11-23 | 0-6 | 12-14 | 47.8% |
| 2026-01-28 | Holy Cross | W 79–74 | 35:09 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-16 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Boston U. | W 80–79 | 37:10 | 23 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 10-19 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 55.3% |
| 2026-01-21 | American | L 66–70 | 37:16 | 21 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8-12 | 1-1 | 4-6 | 70.8% |
| 2026-01-17 | Bucknell | W 95–76 | 33:00 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-6 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 91.7% |
| 2026-01-14 | Loyola Maryland | W 86–80 | 29:32 | 17 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-14 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Lehigh | L 77–78 | 31:58 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-18 | 1-1 | 5-7 | 47.2% |
| 2026-01-07 | American | W 64–62 | 28:25 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-31 | Lafayette | W 85–77 | 36:53 | 29 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10-13 | 2-3 | 7-7 | 84.6% |
| 2025-12-28 | Harvard | L 69–78 | 36:00 | 19 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-14 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Florida | L 60–90 | 34:48 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | St. Bonaventure | L 77–85 | 36:21 | 26 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 11-20 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 55.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | Fordham | W 72–62 | 38:27 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2025-11-28 | UAlbany | W 69–67 | 36:40 | 17 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7-15 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | Cornell | L 94–95 | 42:33 | 24 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11-21 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 52.4% |
| 2025-11-17 | Siena | W 72–69 | 37:48 | 22 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7-15 | 2-5 | 6-7 | 53.3% |
| 2025-11-14 | Illinois | L 65–84 | 32:22 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-12 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-11 | Drexel | W 90–83 | 35:29 | 26 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9-14 | 1-1 | 7-7 | 67.9% |
| 2025-11-07 · NCAA | Northeastern | L 65–68 | 11:54 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-03 · NCAA | Michigan St. | L 69–80 | 33:18 | 12 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 5-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 100.0% |