Kyle Carlesimo
Colgate · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
751:35 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 24:15
- Points per game
- 7.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.9 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.0 | 3.9 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 245 | 73 | 31 | 28 | 4 | 22 | 52 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 89–226 | 39.4% | 7.3 | 12.0 |
| 2P | 33–70 | 47.1%† | 2.3 | 3.7 |
| 3P | 56–156 | 35.9% | 5.0 | 8.3 |
| FT | 11–13 | 84.6%† | 0.4 | 0.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.8% | 52.9% | 69.0% | 5.8% | 1.41 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Colgate · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Colgate: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Colgate | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.5 | -3.0 to +0.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -1.6 | +3.1range +2.5 to +3.9 | 2,250 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Colgate | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.6 | -1.1 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | -0.5 | +2.1range +1.6 to +2.5 | 1,344 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 24:16 | 24:15 | 13:51–36:32 | |
| Points | 6.4 | 7.9 | 0.0–20.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 28.9% | 47.3% | 0.0%–108.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Lehigh | L 69–76 | 25:52 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-5 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-05 | Loyola Maryland | W 90–77 | 18:05 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Navy | L 69–85 | 36:14 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7-15 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-25 | Lafayette | L 69–70 | 19:49 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Loyola Maryland | W 101–98 | 21:19 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-9 | 1-7 | 4-4 | 27.8% |
| 2026-02-16 | Boston U. | L 58–85 | 18:10 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-8 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Navy | L 80–84 | 25:29 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-9 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | Holy Cross | W 74–70 | 20:22 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Bucknell | W 78–59 | 29:30 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-10 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Army West Point | W 69–55 | 25:21 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Lehigh | L 76–77 | 27:48 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-28 | Holy Cross | W 79–74 | 13:51 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2026-01-24 | Boston U. | W 80–79 | 30:47 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 108.3% |
| 2026-01-21 | American | L 66–70 | 21:49 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-7 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Bucknell | W 95–76 | 19:01 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Loyola Maryland | W 86–80 | 21:48 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | Lehigh | L 77–78 | 23:33 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-5 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | American | W 64–62 | 25:18 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1-8 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 12.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | Army West Point | W 76–69 | 36:32 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-13 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 69.2% |
| 2025-12-31 | Lafayette | W 85–77 | 24:31 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 30.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Harvard | L 69–78 | 19:23 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Florida | L 60–90 | 22:08 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-8 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-10 | St. Bonaventure | L 77–85 | 28:19 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-10 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | Fordham | W 72–62 | 25:19 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-8 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 68.8% |
| 2025-11-28 | UAlbany | W 69–67 | 25:52 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-9 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2025-11-20 | Cornell | L 94–95 | 31:36 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-12 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-17 | Siena | W 72–69 | 22:37 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-14 | Illinois | L 65–84 | 19:49 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Drexel | W 90–83 | 21:17 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-8 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-07 · NCAA | Northeastern | L 65–68 | 31:00 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-12 | 4-10 | 2-2 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-03 · NCAA | Michigan St. | L 69–80 | 19:06 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 30.0% |