George Washington

A-10 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 66 · Raw net 8.1 · Tempo 69.9 · 34 Division I games · Through 2026-03-22

Record: 18–16; 18 wins
AdjNet: 9.7β; rank 68 of 365
AdjO: 116.1β; rank 54 of 365
AdjD: 106.4β; rank 123 of 365
AdjT: 69.9β
SOS: 2.8β; rank 95 of 363
NCSOS: -0.9β
WAB: -5.9β; rank 128 of 363
RR: -3.8β
Exp. W: 21.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	115.357	107.1136	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	54.455	52.4234	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	18.2282	17.7114	16.7
Offensive rebound %	35.826	28.791	30.6
FTA / FGA %	34.9184	34.9175	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.1106	33.9176	33.9
2P%	55.944	53.5256	51.7
FT%	72.3195	73.0223	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	47.0	43.0	39.5
Assists / FGM %	55.4	60.6	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	10.8	10.4	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	37.0	33.6	31.4
2-pointers %	44.2	46.9	48.8
Free throws %	18.8	19.6	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.9
Top Three Share of Minutes: 39%
Bench Share of Minutes: 38%
Players with Logged Minutes: 12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Maine	W 67–47	66.9	Home	1–0
11-08	South Fla.	W 99–95	85.0	Neutral	2–0
11-12	American	W 107–67	75.7	Home	3–0
11-15	Old Dominion	W 96–73	73.5	Home	4–0
11-19	UMBC	W 89–52	71.1	Home	5–0
11-23	McNeese	L 86–92	73.8	Neutral	5–1
11-24	Middle Tenn.	W 92–79	71.7	Neutral	6–1
11-25	Murray St.	L 95–96	72.3	Neutral	6–2
12-02	Army West Point	W 84–70	67.5	Away	7–2
12-06	William & Mary	W 99–86	77.7	Home	8–2
12-10	Delaware	L 58–70	68.3	Home	8–3
12-13	Florida	L 70–80	71.8	Neutral	8–4
12-31	Richmond	W 99–85	65.5	Away	9–4
01-03	La Salle	W 77–55	64.9	Home	10–4
01-06	Dayton	L 72–79	69.4	Away	10–5
01-10	Loyola Chicago	W 101–66	76.4	Home	11–5
01-14	Davidson	L 79–84	66.4	Home	11–6
01-19	George Mason	L 64–69	67.4	Away	11–7
01-24	Richmond	W 85–69	66.9	Home	12–7
01-27	Saint Louis	L 76–79	75.7	Away	12–8
01-31	Fordham	L 65–79	67.9	Home	12–9
02-04	Saint Joseph's	L 73–76	69.9	Away	12–10
02-07	Duquesne	L 86–88	68.1	Away	12–11
02-10	Rhode Island	W 75–70	67.8	Home	13–11
02-13	George Mason	W 72–53	58.8	Home	14–11
02-17	VCU	L 75–89	68.3	Away	14–12
02-24	La Salle	W 104–77	72.5	Away	15–12
02-27	Dayton	L 66–68	66.9	Home	15–13
03-04	St. Bonaventure	W 91–82 1OT	79.1	Home	16–13
03-07	Loyola Chicago	L 62–68	63.7	Away	16–14
03-12	Fordham	W 66–62	63.8	Neutral	17–14
03-13	Saint Louis	L 81–88	74.4	Neutral	17–15
03-18	Utah Valley	W 79–78	69.0	—	18–15
03-22	New Mexico	L 61–86	68.4	—	18–16

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 34 of 34 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Trey Autry	33	28:53	69.8%	15.1	5.0	1.9	1.0	0.3	1.3	3.5	34–57	59.6%	82–214	38.3%	47–58	81.0%	57.9%	60.9%	21.4%	5	28:32 −0:21	71.3%	10.8 −0.1
Christian Jones	34	26:33	66.1%	15.1	4.5	4.7	1.7	0.2	3.2	2.9	86–166	51.8%	43–118	36.4%	40–61	65.6%	53.0%	54.9%	21.5%	5	31:18 +4:45	78.2%	13.0 +3.0
Jean Aranguren	34	24:05	60.0%	13.4	6.8	5.3	1.8	0.7	3.4	4.2	69–128	53.9%	26–72	36.1%	59–83	71.1%	54.0%	58.1%	41.5%	5	27:53 +3:48	69.7%	6.4 −1.7
Rafael Castro	28	27:32	56.5%	22.3	13.2	2.5	2.5	2.6	2.8	2.8	152–242	62.8%	0–0	—	125–189	66.1%	62.8%	66.0%	78.1%	5	30:56 +3:25	77.3%	12.8 −2.5
Tyrone Marshall	32	23:30	55.1%	15.1	7.9	3.2	2.0	1.2	2.8	4.9	85–146	58.2%	21–58	36.2%	51–78	65.4%	57.1%	59.6%	38.2%	5	25:46 +2:16	64.4%	8.8 −0.1
Tre Dinkins	34	20:46	51.7%	16.7	3.2	3.6	0.9	0.3	2.3	2.4	19–46	41.3%	74–194	38.1%	34–43	79.1%	54.2%	56.8%	17.9%	5	19:37 −1:09	49.0%	5.4 −3.2
Garrett Johnson	29	22:36	48.0%	20.2	6.0	2.1	0.7	0.2	1.8	3.3	55–107	51.4%	53–160	33.1%	62–74	83.8%	50.4%	55.2%	27.7%	4	15:18 −7:18	30.6%	8.3 −3.2
Luke Hunger	32	19:12	45.0%	17.2	10.0	2.0	0.4	0.2	3.1	4.3	75–136	55.1%	14–45	31.1%†	72–89	80.9%	53.0%	60.0%	49.2%	3	18:11 −1:01	27.3%	5.7 −2.6
Bubu Benjamin	29	20:03	42.6%	11.3	5.5	1.8	1.8	0.6	1.2	4.3	33–59	55.9%	24–92	26.1%	26–37	70.3%	45.7%	49.0%	24.5%	5	12:25 −7:38	31.0%	2.6 −3.1
Ty BevinsFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	5:23	3.6%	4.1	5.0	0.8	1.7	0.0	0.8	6.6	0–0	—	1–10	10.0%†	2–2	100.0%†	15.0%†	23.0%†	20.0%†	—	—	—	—
Amir ArringtonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	0:49	0.2%	49.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	1–2	50.0%†	0–0	—	75.0%†	75.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Mohamed BinzagrFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	0:49	0.2%	0.0	0.0	0.0	16.3	0.0	0.0	16.3	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–2	0.0%†	—	0.0%†	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	34 games			80.6	36.9	15.4	not published	3.5	12.7	not published	608–1087	55.9%	339–965	35.1%	518–716	72.3%	54.4%	58.1%	34.9%
Sum of players				80.6	33.9	15.4	7.2	3.5	12.1	18.0	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.0	0.0	not published	+0.1	+0.6	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $830K; 80% Range $360K to $1.85M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $810K to $860K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 12; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Trey Autry	70.2%	$130K	$54K to $310K	15.4%	$130K to $135K	$7K	Sufficient evidence
Christian Jones	66.8%	$105K	$40K to $245K	13.2%	$100K to $110K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jean Aranguren	60.8%	$89K	$30K to $220K	11.3%	$86K to $92K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rafael Castro	57.3%	$150K	$61K to $390K	16.8%	$145K to $155K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tyrone Marshall	55.1%	$67K	$15K to $175K	9.1%	$65K to $69K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tre Dinkins	50.8%	$64K	$19K to $160K	8.6%	$62K to $67K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Garrett Johnson	46.9%	$60K	$18K to $150K	8.0%	$59K to $63K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Luke Hunger	44.9%	$57K	$19K to $140K	7.7%	$56K to $59K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Bubu Benjamin	43.3%	$45K	$12K to $115K	6.3%	$44K to $47K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ty Bevins	3.6%	$7K	$3K to $16K	0.8%	$6K to $7K	$7K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Amir Arrington	0.2%	$7K	$3K to $16K	0.8%	$6K to $7K	$7K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Mohamed Binzagr	0.2%	$7K	$3K to $16K	0.8%	$6K to $7K	$7K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$830K	$360K to $1.85M	100%	$810K to $860K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, George Washington University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$6,210,233	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$6,210,233
Athletics department expenses	$41,323,716
Athletics department revenue	$41,323,716

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 34 games, 2,386 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1365 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	80.6	74.9
Field goals made	27.8	25.9
Field goals attempted	60.1	57.5
3-pointers made	9.9	8.4
3-pointers attempted	28.3	24.7
Free throws made	15.2	14.7
Free throws attempted	21.0	20.1
Offensive rebounds	12.6	9.8
Defensive rebounds	24.4	22.5
Total rebounds	36.9	32.3
Assists	15.4	15.7
Blocks	3.5	3.3
Turnovers	12.7	12.4
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 246.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 613.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

34 of 34 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,751	2,751	0	±13.8	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	947	947	0	±4.7	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,052	2,052	0	±10.3	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	339	339	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	965	965	0	±4.8	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	518	518	0	±2.6	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	716	716	0	±3.6	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,260	1,157	+103	±100.8	0
Assists	Reconciled	525	525	0	±2.6	0
Blocks	Reconciled	121	119	+2	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	434	414	+20	±13.0	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	246	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	613	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,825	6,808	+16.7	±136.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Trey Autry	70.2%	+2.8range +1.6 to +4.1Sufficient evidence
Christian Jones	66.8%	+2.2range +1.0 to +3.4Sufficient evidence
Jean Aranguren	60.8%	+1.9range +0.6 to +3.4Sufficient evidence
Rafael Castro	57.3%	+4.1range +2.6 to +5.4Sufficient evidence
Tyrone Marshall	55.1%	+1.2range -0.5 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Tre Dinkins	50.8%	+1.5range +0.0 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Garrett Johnson	46.9%	+1.4range +0.1 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Luke Hunger	44.9%	+1.4range +0.3 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Bubu Benjamin	43.3%	+0.9range -0.4 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Ty Bevins	3.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Amir Arrington	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Mohamed Binzagr	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +11.4range +10.5 to +12.5Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 99.2% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.8%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value