South Carolina St.

MEAC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 353 · Raw net -18.7 · Tempo 70.3 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-13

Record: 8–22; 8 wins
AdjNet: -20.2β; rank 357 of 365
AdjO: 96.3β; rank 355 of 365
AdjD: 116.5β; rank 342 of 365
AdjT: 69.6β
SOS: -5.2β; rank 325 of 363
NCSOS: 4.8β
WAB: -16.3β; rank 333 of 363
RR: 0.9β
Exp. W: 7.1β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	96.0354	114.7320	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	46.8341	53.9296	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	20.8355	18.857	16.7
Offensive rebound %	31.4146	37.6362	30.6
FTA / FGA %	41.146	51.9364	35.0
Shooting
3P%	34.0174	33.5157	33.9
2P%	44.8357	56.3335	51.7
FT%	66.8344	73.2226	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	33.3	38.9	39.5
Assists / FGM %	52.6	57.9	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	11.3	9.6	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	28.0	26.8	31.4
2-pointers %	49.3	47.1	48.8
Free throws %	22.6	26.1	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 11.3
Top Three Share of Minutes: 36%
Bench Share of Minutes: 46%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Louisville	L 45–104	81.6	Away	0–1
11-07	Samford	L 72–82	72.1	Away	0–2
11-10	N.C. A&T	L 62–85	81.0	Away	0–3
11-14	Col. of Charleston	L 61–88	67.3	Away	0–4
11-19	Chattanooga	L 66–78	72.4	Home	0–5
11-23	South Dakota	L 81–82	70.7	Away	0–6
11-25	Missouri	L 66–98	70.0	Away	0–7
11-29	Winthrop	L 79–101	73.4	Away	0–8
12-05	Bethune-Cookman	L 59–80	65.9	Away	0–9
12-08	Charleston So.	L 44–84	68.3	Away	0–10
12-12	Queens (NC)	L 78–102	71.7	Away	0–11
12-16	USC Upstate	L 72–78	67.5	Home	0–12
12-22	South Carolina	L 70–95	70.3	Away	0–13
12-30	Tennessee	L 54–105	69.1	Away	0–14
01-03	Howard	W 58–57	69.6	Home	1–14
01-10	Morgan St.	L 67–72	66.7	Away	1–15
01-12	Coppin St.	W 74–72	65.4	Away	2–15
01-17	Norfolk St.	L 82–89	71.9	Home	2–16
01-26	Delaware St.	W 70–64	68.8	Home	3–16
02-04	UMES	W 63–54	64.5	Home	4–16
02-07	Howard	L 57–85	75.1	Away	4–17
02-16	Coppin St.	L 57–59	67.4	Home	4–18
02-18	N.C. Central	W 85–72	66.7	Home	5–18
02-21	Norfolk St.	L 71–90	71.4	Away	5–19
02-25	Morgan St.	L 83–90	73.0	Home	5–20
02-28	UMES	L 57–69	66.3	Away	5–21
03-02	Delaware St.	W 61–59	61.1	Away	6–21
03-05	N.C. Central	W 80–64	69.8	Away	7–21
03-12	Norfolk St.	W 88–82	75.5	Neutral	8–21
03-13	Howard	L 61–78	73.6	Neutral	8–22

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Jayden Johnson	30	27:56	69.8%	410	87	106	42	1	75	67	101–217	46.5%	36–96	37.5%	100–138	72.5%	49.5%	54.9%	44.1%	5	30:46 +2:50	76.9%	15.0 +1.3
Florian Tenebay	29	23:01	55.6%	203	81	55	34	2	56	56	52–124	41.9%	7–27	25.9%†	78–109	71.6%	41.4%	51.0%	72.2%	5	23:23 +0:22	58.5%	9.8 +2.8
Noah Treadwell	30	22:03	55.1%	283	40	18	11	2	36	48	17–36	47.2%	69–198	34.8%	42–62	67.7%	51.5%	54.2%	26.5%	5	28:09 +6:06	70.4%	14.0 +4.6
Owen Bronston, Jr.	25	21:03	43.8%	258	63	17	17	1	17	52	33–83	39.8%	56–152	36.8%	24–31	77.4%	49.8%	51.9%	13.2%	3	14:02 −7:00	21.1%	8.3 −2.0
Cameron Clark	24	21:17	42.6%	190	116	20	12	15	43	71	69–155	44.5%	0–0	—	52–84	61.9%	44.5%	49.5%	54.2%	5	17:58 −3:19	44.9%	7.2 −0.7
Rayniel Wright	30	16:11	40.5%	99	44	54	34	1	56	42	37–90	41.1%†	1–6	16.7%†	22–44	50.0%	40.1%†	42.9%†	45.8%†	5	13:25 −2:46	33.5%	0.8 −2.5
James Morrow	23	20:50	39.9%	179	74	26	19	13	28	71	46–90	51.1%	12–34	35.3%†	51–61	83.6%	51.6%	59.3%	49.2%	3	22:08 +1:18	33.2%	6.7 −1.1
Derwin Hodge	25	18:12	37.9%	62	72	30	10	25	35	82	27–58	46.6%†	0–0	—	8–22	36.4%†	46.6%†	45.8%†	37.9%†	5	17:16 −0:57	43.2%	2.4 −0.1
Christopher Parker	23	17:24	33.4%	152	102	14	11	1	12	41	53–128	41.4%	1–4	25.0%†	43–51	84.3%	41.3%	49.2%	38.6%	5	12:13 −5:11	30.5%	3.6 −3.0
Tim Okojie	30	10:26	26.1%	37	35	4	3	41	14	40	14–32	43.8%†	0–0	—	9–27	33.3%	43.8%†	42.2%†	84.4%†	5	16:31 +6:05	41.3%	2.6 +1.4
Teon Tindal	25	9:29	19.8%	64	41	5	7	9	19	33	25–48	52.1%†	0–0	—	14–30	46.7%	52.1%†	52.3%†	62.5%†	5	8:55 −0:34	22.3%	3.0 +0.4
Jamal Miles	20	7:51	13.1%	35	17	4	1	2	6	20	9–16	56.3%†	4–27	14.8%†	5–10	50.0%†	34.9%†	36.9%†	23.3%†	5	9:19 +1:28	23.3%	2.0 +0.3
D'Shay Knights Wright	11	13:53	12.7%	35	33	7	4	0	10	16	11–25	44.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	10–17	58.8%†	43.1%†	48.0%†	58.6%†	—	—	—	—
Colin McKenzieFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	15:36	7.8%	16	11	2	1	1	10	13	5–13	38.5%†	2–8	25.0%†	0–0	—	38.1%†	38.1%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	30 games			2023	914	362	not published	114	438	not published	499–1115	44.8%	189–556	34.0%	458–686	66.8%	46.8%	51.3%	41.1%
Sum of players				2023	816	362	206	114	417	652	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+98	0	not published	0	+21	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $175K; 80% Range $66K to $465K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $170K to $180K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Jayden Johnson	69.6%	$26K	$1K to $105K	15.7%	$25K to $27K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Florian Tenebay	55.9%	$7K	$1K to $38K	6.6%	$6K to $7K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Noah Treadwell	55.4%	$8K	$1K to $42K	7.8%	$8K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Owen Bronston, Jr.	43.8%	$10K	$1K to $45K	8.4%	$10K to $11K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Cameron Clark	42.0%	$5K	$1K to $25K	4.0%	$4K to $5K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
James Morrow	41.7%	$13K	$1K to $63K	9.0%	$13K to $14K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rayniel Wright	41.5%	$3K	$1K to $13K	1.1%	$2K to $3K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Derwin Hodge	37.5%	$11K	$1K to $57K	7.9%	$11K to $12K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Christopher Parker	31.8%	$7K	$1K to $33K	6.0%	$7K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tim Okojie	26.6%	$15K	$2K to $75K	7.4%	$14K to $16K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Teon Tindal	19.7%	$3K	$1K to $15K	2.8%	$3K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jamal Miles	14.1%	$3K	$1K to $10K	1.8%	$2K to $3K	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
D'Shay Knights Wright	12.0%	$3K	$1K to $9K	1.8%	$2K to $3K	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Colin McKenzie	8.5%	$2K	$1K to $6K	1.1%	$2K in all four	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$175K	$66K to $465K	100%	$170K to $180K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, South Carolina State University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,410,787	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$1,410,787
Athletics department expenses	$13,880,289
Athletics department revenue	$13,880,289

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 30 games, 2,108 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,023	2,418
Field goals made	688	786
Field goals attempted	1,671	1,658
3-pointers made	189	216
3-pointers attempted	556	645
Free throws made	458	630
Free throws attempted	686	861
Offensive rebounds	329	353
Defensive rebounds	585	719
Total rebounds	914	1,072
Assists	362	455
Blocks	114	107
Turnovers	438	396
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 206.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 652.
Minutes (derived)	6,000	not published

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,023	2,023	0	±10.1	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	688	688	0	±3.4	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,671	1,671	0	±8.4	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	189	189	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	556	556	0	±2.8	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	458	458	0	±2.3	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	686	686	0	±3.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	914	816	+98	±73.1	0
Assists	Reconciled	362	362	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	114	114	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	438	417	+21	±13.1	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	206	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	652	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,000	5,978	+22.4	±120.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Jayden Johnson	69.6%	-0.8range -2.0 to +0.7Sufficient evidence
Florian Tenebay	55.9%	-2.3range -3.9 to -0.8Sufficient evidence
Noah Treadwell	55.4%	-2.1range -3.3 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Owen Bronston, Jr.	43.8%	-1.3range -2.4 to -0.2Sufficient evidence
Cameron Clark	42.0%	-2.6range -3.8 to -1.1Sufficient evidence
James Morrow	41.7%	-1.1range -2.7 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Rayniel Wright	41.5%	-5.2range -6.6 to -3.6Sufficient evidence
Derwin Hodge	37.5%	-1.1range -2.4 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Christopher Parker	31.8%	-1.5range -2.6 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Tim Okojie	26.6%	-0.3range -1.3 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Teon Tindal	19.7%	-2.0range -3.1 to -1.0Sufficient evidence
Jamal Miles	14.1%	-2.4range -3.3 to -1.4Limited evidence
D'Shay Knights Wright	12.0%	-2.3range -3.4 to -1.1Limited evidence
Colin McKenzie	8.5%	-3.4range -3.9 to -2.8Limited evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +7.6range +6.8 to +8.5Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

14 valued players hold 100.0% of on-court time. 0 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 6.9%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value