Austin Peay

ASUN · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 81 · Raw net 6.3 · Tempo 70.1 · 29 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

Record: 20–9; 20 wins
AdjNet: 1.6β; rank 151 of 365
AdjO: 108.3β; rank 175 of 365
AdjD: 106.7β; rank 134 of 365
AdjT: 69.9β
SOS: -4.7β; rank 315 of 363
NCSOS: 1.9β
WAB: -4.2β; rank 91 of 363
RR: 1.0β
Exp. W: 19.0β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	112.791	106.4114	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	53.0105	52.2227	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.493	17.9104	16.7
Offensive rebound %	29.7214	28.9100	30.6
FTA / FGA %	37.6110	32.8128	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.399	33.2136	33.9
2P%	53.0127	53.9274	51.7
FT%	73.4159	70.985	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	38.0	40.8	39.5
Assists / FGM %	56.0	52.5	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	6.4	8.7	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	30.1	31.8	31.4
2-pointers %	49.2	50.0	48.8
Free throws %	20.7	18.2	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.1
Top Three Share of Minutes: 46%
Bench Share of Minutes: 26%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-08	Air Force	W 74–54	71.6	Away	1–0
11-11	Wyoming	L 65–79	76.7	Away	1–1
11-15	UNC Greensboro	W 69–63	73.0	Away	2–1
11-18	Ole Miss	L 65–72	68.2	Away	2–2
11-21	Tulsa	L 75–84	68.1	Away	2–3
11-25	NIU	W 77–59	64.8	Home	3–3
12-03	Kent St.	L 84–96	73.4	Away	3–4
12-07	UTRGV	L 50–63	69.1	Away	3–5
12-12	ETSU	W 76–75	69.9	Home	4–5
01-01	North Florida	W 102–83	77.9	Home	5–5
01-03	Jacksonville	W 71–68	69.0	Home	6–5
01-08	FGCU	W 82–71	69.0	Away	7–5
01-10	Stetson	W 81–69	70.2	Away	8–5
01-15	Eastern Ky.	W 74–72	62.7	Home	9–5
01-17	Lipscomb	L 78–82	74.9	Away	9–6
01-22	FGCU	W 83–62	67.2	Home	10–6
01-23	Stetson	W 73–65	67.0	Home	11–6
01-28	Eastern Ky.	W 90–82	73.9	Away	12–6
01-31	West Ga.	W 81–78	74.7	Away	13–6
02-04	Lipscomb	W 87–76	71.9	Home	14–6
02-07	North Ala.	W 91–62	61.8	Home	15–6
02-11	Queens (NC)	W 95–87	73.7	Away	16–6
02-14	Bellarmine	W 90–70	60.5	Home	17–6
02-19	North Florida	W 77–76	78.0	Away	18–6
02-21	Jacksonville	W 65–61	60.4	Away	19–6
02-25	Central Ark.	L 88–93	67.8	Home	19–7
02-28	Bellarmine	L 97–111	82.7	Away	19–8
03-06	Stetson	W 69–60	62.9	Neutral	20–8
03-07	Queens (NC)	L 83–90	72.7	Neutral	20–9

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 28 of 29 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Collin Parker	28	31:54	77.0%	23.0	8.2	4.2	1.1	0.5	2.1	2.6	129–255	50.6%	52–126	41.3%	99–121	81.8%	54.3%	59.1%	31.8%	5	34:52 +2:59	87.2%	16.0 −2.3
Tate McCubbin	28	30:18	73.1%	12.6	6.2	1.7	1.7	0.3	1.2	3.0	29–67	43.3%	56–165	33.9%	41–52	78.8%	48.7%	52.4%	22.4%	5	31:32 +1:14	78.8%	7.4 −2.1
Rashaud Marshall	28	30:08	72.7%	21.8	9.2	1.5	1.3	1.1	1.6	4.0	169–258	65.5%	0–0	—	121–182	66.5%	65.5%	67.9%	70.5%	5	34:56 +4:47	87.3%	27.2 +10.8
Zyree Collins	28	30:07	72.7%	18.3	4.2	5.6	2.8	0.0	3.4	4.1	101–208	48.6%	28–93	30.1%	99–131	75.6%	47.5%	53.7%	43.5%	5	35:01 +4:53	87.5%	10.6 −3.2
Anton Brookshire	28	25:17	61.0%	13.1	3.7	3.6	1.5	0.1	2.3	2.5	19–40	47.5%	48–132	36.4%	50–63	79.4%	52.9%	58.1%	36.6%	5	31:51 +6:33	79.6%	8.4 +0.1
Ja'Corey Robinson	27	16:46	39.0%	14.9	6.2	4.2	2.3	0.9	3.2	3.0	62–122	50.8%	3–9	33.3%†	36–48	75.0%	50.8%	55.5%	36.6%	5	13:38 −3:08	34.1%	4.4 −1.9
Matt Enright	22	14:17	27.1%	9.0	3.2	2.3	1.4	0.0	0.9	2.9	4–15	26.7%†	19–52	36.5%	6–9	66.7%†	48.5%†	50.0%†	13.4%†	3	5:01 −9:16	7.5%	2.0 −1.2
Creighton Morisch	28	8:35	20.7%	5.0	8.0	1.5	0.7	1.0	2.5	5.2	12–25	48.0%†	2–7	28.6%†	0–9	0.0%†	46.9%†	41.7%†	28.1%†	5	7:10 −1:25	17.9%	1.2 +0.1
Travis Torain	21	7:15	13.1%	8.4	10.8	0.3	1.3	0.5	1.8	4.5	14–23	60.9%†	0–0	—	4–4	100.0%†	60.9%†	64.6%†	17.4%†	5	1:58 −5:16	4.9%	0.0 −1.5
Tyler Wagner	20	6:06	10.5%	10.5	7.2	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.7	4.3	1–1	100.0%†	10–30	33.3%†	0–1	0.0%†	51.6%†	50.9%†	3.2%†	2	13:32 +7:26	13.5%	10.0 +8.4
Quan LaxFew games	8	14:18	9.9%	4.5	4.9	2.4	2.4	0.0	2.1	5.9	5–11	45.5%†	0–7	0.0%†	3–5	60.0%†	27.8%†	32.2%†	27.8%†	—	—	—	—
Hansel EnmanuelFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	5:28	4.2%	4.9	7.3	0.0	0.0	1.6	0.8	8.1	1–6	16.7%†	0–0	—	4–6	66.7%†	16.7%†	34.7%†	100.0%†	—	—	—	—
Terrell GainesFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	1:10	0.3%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	22.9	11.4	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	28 games			78.9	35.0	15.1	not published	2.2	10.9	not published	546–1031	53.0%	218–621	35.1%	463–631	73.4%	52.8%	57.2%	38.2%
Sum of players				78.9	31.8	15.1	8.3	2.2	10.6	17.2	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.1	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.3	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $250K; 80% Range $93K to $680K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $245K to $255K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 2 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Collin Parker	79.6%	$50K	$17K to $150K	19.3%	$49K to $52K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Zyree Collins	77.8%	$27K	$7K to $84K	12.8%	$26K to $28K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tate McCubbin	72.8%	$31K	$9K to $89K	13.3%	$30K to $31K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rashaud Marshall	72.6%	$56K	$19K to $170K	21.0%	$55K to $58K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Anton Brookshire	62.9%	$29K	$9K to $84K	12.3%	$28K to $30K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ja'Corey Robinson	40.9%	$16K	$4K to $51K	7.3%	$16K to $17K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Matt Enright	29.0%	$7K	$1K to $24K	3.4%	$6K to $7K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Creighton Morisch	24.1%	$4K	$1K to $16K	1.8%	$4K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Travis Torain	12.7%	$5K	$1K to $14K	2.2%	$5K in all four	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Quan Lax	11.1%	$3K	$1K to $10K	1.4%	$3K in all four	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tyler Wagner	10.9%	$3K	$1K to $10K	1.3%	$3K in all four	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Hansel Enmanuel	5.1%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Terrell Gaines	0.3%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$250K	$93K to $680K	100%	$245K to $255K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Austin Peay State University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,590,785	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$2,590,785
Athletics department expenses	$26,749,245
Athletics department revenue	$26,749,245

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 29 games, 2,033 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1160 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	79.0	74.6
Field goals made	27.4	26.6
Field goals attempted	59.2	58.4
3-pointers made	7.9	7.9
3-pointers attempted	22.5	23.8
Free throws made	16.3	13.6
Free throws attempted	22.3	19.2
Offensive rebounds	10.3	10.0
Defensive rebounds	24.6	24.4
Total rebounds	34.9	34.4
Assists	15.3	13.9
Blocks	2.2	3.2
Turnovers	10.8	12.5
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 231.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 482.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

28 of 29 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,209	2,209	0	±11.0	83
Field goals made	Reconciled	764	764	0	±3.8	30
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,652	1,652	0	±8.3	64
3-pointers made	Reconciled	218	218	0	±2.0	12
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	621	621	0	±3.1	31
Free throws made	Reconciled	463	463	0	±2.3	11
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	631	631	0	±3.2	15
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	979	891	+88	±78.3	33
Assists	Reconciled	424	424	0	±2.1	21
Blocks	Reconciled	62	62	0	±2.0	2
Turnovers	Reconciled	305	296	+9	±9.2	8
Steals	No team figure	not published	231	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	482	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,600	5,585	+15.3	±112.0	200

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Collin Parker	79.6%	+2.4range +1.4 to +3.6Sufficient evidence
Zyree Collins	77.8%	+0.8range -0.2 to +1.7Sufficient evidence
Tate McCubbin	72.8%	+1.3range +0.3 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Rashaud Marshall	72.6%	+3.1range +2.3 to +4.0Sufficient evidence
Anton Brookshire	62.9%	+1.6range +0.8 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Ja'Corey Robinson	40.9%	+0.9range -0.5 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Matt Enright	29.0%	-0.6range -1.5 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Creighton Morisch	24.1%	-1.6range -2.7 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Travis Torain	12.7%	+0.1range -0.6 to +0.8Limited evidence
Quan Lax	11.1%	-1.0range -1.8 to -0.5Limited evidence
Tyler Wagner	10.9%	-1.4range -2.3 to -0.4Limited evidence
Hansel Enmanuel	5.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Terrell Gaines	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.6range +9.8 to +11.5Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 98.9% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.1%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 6.9%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value