New Mexico St.

CUSA · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 166 · Raw net 0.9 · Tempo 67.2 · 27 Division I games · Through 2026-03-11

Record: 13–14; 13 wins
AdjNet: -0.2β; rank 176 of 365
AdjO: 108.4β; rank 169 of 365
AdjD: 108.6β; rank 187 of 365
AdjT: 67.6β
SOS: -1.2β; rank 203 of 363
NCSOS: -1.3β
WAB: -8.9β; rank 205 of 363
RR: -1.3β
Exp. W: 14.3β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	108.6170	107.6152	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	48.6299	48.344	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	14.855	14.5322	16.7
Offensive rebound %	32.5110	30.6185	30.6
FTA / FGA %	35.1174	42.0321	35.0
Shooting
3P%	32.9238	31.752	33.9
2P%	48.2302	48.860	51.7
FT%	73.6148	71.2112	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	38.2	41.1	39.5
Assists / FGM %	48.2	46.5	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.8	8.1	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	30.6	30.9	31.4
2-pointers %	48.4	45.5	48.8
Free throws %	21.0	23.6	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.5
Top Three Share of Minutes: 41%
Bench Share of Minutes: 38%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-15	New Mexico	W 76–68	65.7	Home	1–0
11-21	Samford	W 81–72	62.3	Home	2–0
11-25	UC Irvine	W 57–45	69.8	Neutral	3–0
11-26	Georgia St.	W 77–58	74.2	Neutral	4–0
12-06	Abilene Christian	L 69–77	63.3	Away	4–1
12-21	Sam Houston	W 87–78	74.3	Home	5–1
01-02	FIU	L 74–89	71.0	Away	5–2
01-04	Missouri St.	L 82–89	71.2	Away	5–3
01-08	Western Ky.	W 80–64	66.0	Home	6–3
01-10	Middle Tenn.	L 55–59	64.9	Home	6–4
01-15	Liberty	L 71–73	58.2	Away	6–5
01-17	Delaware	W 97–68	61.9	Away	7–5
01-22	Missouri St.	L 75–84	64.7	Home	7–6
01-24	FIU	L 78–81	75.6	Home	7–7
01-28	Delaware	L 64–73	60.0	Home	7–8
01-31	Kennesaw St.	L 53–76	66.9	Away	7–9
02-04	Louisiana Tech	W 72–63	63.5	Away	8–9
02-07	UTEP	L 88–91 1OT	81.5	Away	8–10
02-11	Liberty	L 75–77	67.3	Home	8–11
02-14	Jacksonville St.	W 79–70	65.9	Away	9–11
02-21	UTEP	W 67–63	58.3	Home	10–11
02-26	Western Ky.	L 70–93	78.9	Away	10–12
02-28	Middle Tenn.	L 85–86 1OT	75.2	Away	10–13
03-05	Jacksonville St.	W 77–75 1OT	75.9	Home	11–13
03-07	Kennesaw St.	W 79–76	67.6	Home	12–13
03-10	Jacksonville St.	W 68–63	64.2	Neutral	13–13
03-11	Sam Houston	L 61–69	71.5	Neutral	13–14

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 27 of 27 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Jemel Jones	27	28:47	71.0%	473	114	62	37	14	38	51	113–263	43.0%	41–113	36.3%	124–147	84.4%	46.4%	53.7%	39.1%	5	34:53 +6:06	83.1%	23.6 +6.1
Julius Mims	27	28:11	69.5%	282	239	18	12	17	28	71	104–169	61.5%	9–28	32.1%†	47–73	64.4%	59.6%	61.5%	37.1%	5	25:50 −2:22	61.5%	9.0 −1.4
Anthony Wrzeszcz	27	24:56	61.5%	196	56	22	10	4	17	52	13–27	48.1%	49–148	33.1%	23–29	79.3%	49.4%	52.2%	16.6%	5	27:10 +2:14	64.7%	6.2 −1.1
Jae'Coby Osborne	27	23:40	58.3%	178	134	14	15	11	21	64	70–109	64.2%	3–14	21.4%†	29–48	60.4%	60.6%	61.8%	39.0%	5	26:15 +2:36	62.5%	6.6 0.0
Gabe Pickens	26	20:42	49.1%	125	39	70	18	0	44	64	29–66	43.9%	14–40	35.0%†	25–41	61.0%	47.2%	50.4%	38.7%	5	30:11 +9:29	71.9%	7.4 +2.6
Jayland Randall	27	19:11	47.3%	235	85	19	14	7	15	51	38–92	41.3%	35–109	32.1%	54–65	83.1%	45.0%	51.2%	32.3%	5	23:52 +4:41	56.8%	10.6 +1.9
Elijah Elliott	27	18:54	46.6%	223	53	65	20	5	36	36	40–110	36.4%	27–93	29.0%	62–79	78.5%	39.7%	46.9%	38.9%	5	12:35 −6:19	30.0%	4.2 −4.1
Chris Terrell	26	12:51	30.5%	106	41	45	13	1	20	33	22–58	37.9%†	17–37	45.9%†	11–14	78.6%†	50.0%†	52.4%†	14.7%†	5	10:22 −2:29	24.7%	2.6 −1.5
Kyrese Mullen	21	15:10	29.1%	82	82	11	5	2	21	53	18–49	36.7%†	7–31	22.6%†	25–44	56.8%	35.6%†	41.3%†	55.0%†	4	12:53 −2:18	24.5%	2.3 −1.7
Cyr Malonga	19	10:12	17.7%	46	39	2	4	5	9	22	17–26	65.4%†	0–0	—	12–20	60.0%†	65.4%†	66.1%†	76.9%†	2	2:41 −7:31	2.6%	0.0 −2.4
Augustine Ekwe	18	9:55	16.3%	45	39	2	2	14	9	31	19–32	59.4%†	0–0	—	7–9	77.8%†	59.4%†	62.6%†	28.1%†	4	9:15 −0:40	17.6%	2.5 0.0
Christian VillegasFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	1:16	0.6%	0	1	1	0	0	2	0	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:01 −1:15	0.0%	0.0 0.0
Teysean EaglestaffFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	1:35	0.6%	0	0	0	0	1	0	2	0–1	0.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Amarco DoyleFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	2:20	0.4%	6	1	0	0	0	1	1	0–0	—	2–4	50.0%†	0–0	—	75.0%†	75.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	27 games			1997	1016	331	not published	81	273	not published	483–1002	48.2%	204–620	32.9%	419–569	73.6%	48.6%	53.3%	35.1%
Sum of players				1997	923	331	150	81	261	531	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+93	0	not published	0	+12	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $290K; 80% Range $100K to $795K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $275K to $295K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Jemel Jones	71.0%	$67K	$22K to $215K	21.2%	$65K to $69K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Julius Mims	69.7%	$18K	$2K to $69K	8.6%	$17K to $18K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Anthony Wrzeszcz	61.2%	$7K	$1K to $40K	2.4%	$6K to $7K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jae'Coby Osborne	58.5%	$32K	$8K to $105K	11.9%	$30K to $32K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Gabe Pickens	49.7%	$18K	$3K to $63K	8.0%	$17K to $18K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jayland Randall	47.4%	$30K	$9K to $95K	10.6%	$29K to $31K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Elijah Elliott	46.8%	$36K	$11K to $115K	12.0%	$34K to $36K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chris Terrell	30.3%	$14K	$4K to $45K	5.8%	$14K to $15K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kyrese Mullen	29.5%	$9K	$2K to $34K	4.3%	$9K to $10K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Cyr Malonga	18.1%	$9K	$2K to $29K	3.6%	$9K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Augustine Ekwe	16.0%	$8K	$3K to $27K	3.3%	$8K to $9K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Christian Villegas	0.6%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Teysean Eaglestaff	0.6%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Amarco Doyle	0.5%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$290K	$100K to $795K	100%	$275K to $295K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, New Mexico State University-Main Campus (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$3,369,157	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$3,369,157
Athletics department expenses	$37,088,598
Athletics department revenue	$37,088,598

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 27 games, 1,840 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	1,997	1,980
Field goals made	687	654
Field goals attempted	1,622	1,565
3-pointers made	204	204
3-pointers attempted	620	643
Free throws made	419	468
Free throws attempted	569	657
Offensive rebounds	325	305
Defensive rebounds	691	676
Total rebounds	1,016	981
Assists	331	304
Blocks	81	81
Turnovers	273	267
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 150.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 531.
Minutes (derived)	5,475	not published

27 of 27 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	1,997	1,997	0	±10.0	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	687	687	0	±3.4	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,622	1,622	0	±8.1	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	204	204	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	620	620	0	±3.1	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	419	419	0	±2.1	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	569	569	0	±2.8	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,016	923	+93	±81.3	0
Assists	Reconciled	331	331	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	81	81	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	273	261	+12	±8.2	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	150	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	531	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,475	5,460	+15.2	±109.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Jemel Jones	71.0%	+2.6range +1.3 to +3.9Sufficient evidence
Julius Mims	69.7%	-0.5range -1.7 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Anthony Wrzeszcz	61.2%	-2.3range -3.2 to -1.3Sufficient evidence
Jae'Coby Osborne	58.5%	+1.2range -0.1 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Gabe Pickens	49.7%	+0.1range -0.9 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Jayland Randall	47.4%	+1.5range +0.2 to +2.7Sufficient evidence
Elijah Elliott	46.8%	+1.9range +0.2 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Chris Terrell	30.3%	+0.7range -0.3 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Kyrese Mullen	29.5%	-0.3range -1.2 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Cyr Malonga	18.1%	+0.4range -1.1 to +2.2Sufficient evidence
Augustine Ekwe	16.0%	+0.5range -0.3 to +1.4Limited evidence
Christian Villegas	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Teysean Eaglestaff	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Amarco Doyle	0.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.0range +9.1 to +11.0Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.7% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 3.2%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value