Jemel Jones
New Mexico St. · 2025–26 · 27 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
777:20 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 27
- Minutes per game
- 28:47
- Points per game
- 17.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.2 / 2.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.5 | 4.2 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 24.3 | 5.9 | 3.2 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 473 | 114 | 62 | 37 | 14 | 38 | 51 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 154–376 | 41.0% | 13.9 | 19.3 |
| 2P | 113–263 | 43.0% | 9.7 | 13.5 |
| 3P | 41–113 | 36.3% | 4.2 | 5.8 |
| FT | 124–147 | 84.4% | 5.4 | 7.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.4% | 53.7% | 30.1% | 39.1% | 1.63 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
New Mexico St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $67K
- 80% range $22K to $215K
- Median share of team pool
- 21.2%
- team pool $290K, 80% range $100K to $795K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $65K to $69K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 71.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
New Mexico St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | New Mexico St | $67Kspeculative | $22K to $215K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.6 | +1.3 to +3.9 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | +1.3 | +5.7range +5.1 to +6.3 | 2,612 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:53 | 28:47 | 10:51–40:25 | |
| Points | 23.6 | 17.5 | 4.0–34.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 44.3% | 45.5% | 18.2%–71.4% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | Sam Houston | L 61–69 | 29:00 | 19 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6-21 | 1-6 | 6-8 | 31.0% |
| 2026-03-10 | Jacksonville St. | W 68–63 | 32:47 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-16 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-07 | Kennesaw St. | W 79–76 | 32:27 | 19 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-17 | 2-4 | 5-6 | 41.2% |
| 2026-03-05 | Jacksonville St. | W 77–75 | 40:25 | 29 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9-18 | 2-3 | 9-13 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-28 | Middle Tenn. | L 85–86 | 39:48 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 13-24 | 1-6 | 7-8 | 56.3% |
| 2026-02-26 | Western Ky. | L 70–93 | 21:22 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-11 | 0-5 | 4-4 | 18.2% |
| 2026-02-21 | UTEP | W 67–63 | 31:21 | 21 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8-14 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 67.9% |
| 2026-02-14 | Jacksonville St. | W 79–70 | 27:24 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 6-7 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-11 | Liberty | L 75–77 | 32:45 | 23 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10-19 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 60.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | UTEP | L 88–91 | 35:09 | 26 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9-18 | 2-5 | 6-8 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-04 | Louisiana Tech | W 72–63 | 28:32 | 26 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 10-18 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-31 | Kennesaw St. | L 53–76 | 29:15 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3-10 | 0-1 | 7-8 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Delaware | L 64–73 | 10:51 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | FIU | L 78–81 | 31:52 | 15 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-13 | 3-6 | 4-4 | 42.3% |
| 2026-01-22 | Missouri St. | L 75–84 | 30:31 | 28 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8-18 | 4-8 | 8-9 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-17 | Delaware | W 97–68 | 29:40 | 19 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-15 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Liberty | L 71–73 | 33:42 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5-15 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 43.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | Middle Tenn. | L 55–59 | 22:14 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 5-7 | 55.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | Western Ky. | W 80–64 | 28:31 | 24 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5-15 | 3-5 | 11-12 | 43.3% |
| 2026-01-04 | Missouri St. | L 82–89 | 31:13 | 18 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-16 | 0-5 | 8-8 | 31.3% |
| 2026-01-02 | FIU | L 74–89 | 18:03 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-21 | Sam Houston | W 87–78 | 18:02 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-11 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Abilene Christian | L 69–77 | 34:34 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-13 | 2-4 | 5-8 | 53.8% |
| 2025-11-26 | Georgia St. | W 77–58 | 24:49 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-13 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 30.8% |
| 2025-11-25 | UC Irvine | W 57–45 | 34:19 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-10 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Samford | W 81–72 | 20:24 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-12 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-15 | New Mexico | W 76–68 | 28:20 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-14 | 3-10 | 4-5 | 39.3% |