Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

The Citadel

SC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 346 · Raw net -16.0 · Tempo 64.7 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

All seasons
Record
8–22
8 wins
AdjNet
-16.6β
rank 347 of 365
AdjO
101.6β
rank 315 of 365
AdjD
118.2β
rank 353 of 365
AdjT
65.5β
SOS
-3.5β
rank 278 of 363
NCSOS
-1.1β
WAB
-16.8β
rank 341 of 363
RR
1.4β
Exp. W
6.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.103.4281119.4357108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%49.526557.536151.4
TO / 100 poss.16.315614.730716.7
Offensive rebound %27.926931.522730.6
FTA / FGA %30.030833.313635.0
Shooting
3P%32.028336.633433.9
2P%51.021159.636351.7
FT%66.534968.71472.5
Style
3PA / FGA %47.844.139.5
Assists / FGM %50.652.252.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %7.810.79.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %38.535.131.4
2-pointers %44.748.348.8
Free throws %16.816.619.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
9.1
Top Three Share of Minutes
43%
Bench Share of Minutes
32%
Players with Logged Minutes
18

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-06Boston CollegeL 47–7665.9Away0–1
11-10Charleston So.L 86–9672.1Home0–2
11-14West Ga.L 92–10075.9Away0–3
11-24BellarmineL 58–7060.1Home0–4
11-26Houston ChristianL 65–7258.7Home0–5
11-30PresbyterianL 41–6954.2Neutral0–6
12-04DavidsonL 63–7963.8Away0–7
12-13South CarolinaL 55–7166.2Away0–8
12-17Col. of CharlestonL 78–8272.1Away0–9
12-20RichmondL 56–8064.7Away0–10
12-30ETSUL 49–7463.1Home0–11
01-03WoffordL 86–9566.5Home0–12
01-07MercerL 63–10165.6Away0–13
01-10Western Caro.W 79–77 1OT69.9Home1–13
01-15UNC GreensboroL 66–69 1OT68.6Away1–14
01-17VMIW 82–6867.8Away2–14
01-21FurmanW 77–75 1OT69.9Home3–14
01-23ETSUL 55–8464.1Away3–15
01-29VMIW 80–5662.9Home4–15
01-31UNC GreensboroW 71–66 1OT67.7Home5–15
02-05SamfordL 64–7864.7Away5–16
02-07ChattanoogaW 78–7168.0Away6–16
02-11Western Caro.L 49–8762.4Away6–17
02-14MercerL 54–7061.6Home6–18
02-19SamfordL 75–7870.9Home6–19
02-21ChattanoogaL 72–9372.1Home6–20
02-25FurmanL 51–7259.8Away6–21
02-28WoffordW 93–90 1OT73.7Away7–21
03-06ChattanoogaW 88–8563.5Neutral8–21
03-07ETSUL 76–8365.0Neutral8–22

Roster · 18 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groupsMinutesSeason TotalsShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Sola Adebisi2733:4674.4%269161383036426792–13866.7%12–4427.3%†49–7466.2%60.4%62.7%40.7%538:28 +4:4293.8%18.0 +8.0
Braxton Williams3030:1774.1%4589849218574885–17349.1%73–21434.1%69–9076.7%50.3%53.7%23.3%535:45 +5:2987.2%21.0 +5.7
Carter Kingsbury2829:3967.8%22810962152414961–11453.5%26–8231.7%28–3873.7%51.0%53.6%19.4%528:54 −0:4570.5%3.4 −4.7
Eze Wali3025:2262.1%15210069316376634–8838.6%16–6524.6%36–5466.7%37.9%43.0%35.3%524:11 −1:1159.0%3.8 −1.3
Christian Moore2825:3758.6%3248927113276055–11249.1%57–14738.8%43–6467.2%54.2%56.4%24.7%525:54 +0:1763.2%10.2 −1.4
Logan Applegate3015:4838.7%1936430143143819–3161.3%43–13232.6%26–3476.5%51.2%54.2%20.9%513:10 −2:3832.1%5.4 −1.0
Keynan Davis2912:0428.6%124381864133821–4250.0%17–6924.6%31–5259.6%41.9%46.3%46.8%510:44 −1:2026.2%7.6 +3.3
Marcos Gonzales2612:1526.0%954139161402727–6342.9%†3–1520.0%†32–5261.5%40.4%†47.1%†66.7%†58:59 −3:1721.9%1.6 −2.1
Dante Kearse3010:1925.2%95471661124318–3551.4%†15–3938.5%†14–2360.9%†54.7%†56.5%†31.1%†515:29 +5:1137.8%5.0 +1.8
Simeon German2710:3123.2%51747111114324–5444.4%†0–0—3–1816.7%†44.4%†41.2%†33.3%†42:15 −8:154.4%0.0 −1.9
Gabe Hernandez167:149.5%2737507710–2343.5%†0–60.0%†7–977.8%†34.5%†41.0%†31.0%†10:17 −6:570.1%0.0 −1.7
Cassius BonjaskyUnder 100 minutes165:297.2%291211031110–1758.8%†1–520.0%†6–966.7%†52.3%†55.9%†40.9%†31:38 −3:512.4%0.0 −1.8
Chase WilliamsFew gamesUnder 100 minutes73:422.1%25200001–333.3%†0–0—0–0—33.3%†33.3%†0.0%†10:19 −3:230.2%0.0 −0.3
Logan MenefeeFew gamesUnder 100 minutes52:140.9%22000041–520.0%†0–0—0–0—20.0%†20.0%†0.0%†10:17 −1:570.1%0.0 −0.4
Jameson HeckFew gamesUnder 100 minutes21:260.2%00000010–0—0–10.0%†0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†10:36 −0:500.3%0.0 0.0
Rowan IrelanFew gamesUnder 100 minutes20:570.2%00000000–0—0–20.0%†0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†————
Aidan AlexanderFew gamesUnder 100 minutes20:320.1%01000000–0—0–10.0%†0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†10:36 +0:040.3%0.0 0.0
Jack WalterFew gamesUnder 100 minutes20:240.1%01000000–0—0–10.0%†0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†10:19 −0:050.2%0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · season totals30 games2049961365not published75323not published458–89851.0%263–82332.0%344–51766.5%49.5%52.6%30.0%
Sum of players204984536515775304502Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0+1160not published0+19not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$205K
80% Range $76K to $550K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$195K to $215K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
18
7 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Sola Adebisi76.4%$21K$1K to $87K14.4%$20K to $21K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Braxton Williams75.3%$11K$1K to $58K10.3%$11K to $12K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Carter Kingsbury69.0%$6K$1K to $44K6.2%$6K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Eze Wali63.2%$7K$1K to $44K5.7%$6K to $7K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Christian Moore58.4%$13K$1K to $61K10.3%$13K to $14K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Logan Applegate38.5%$53K$11K to $265K20.2%$50K to $55K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Keynan Davis27.4%$6K$1K to $29K4.6%$6K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dante Kearse25.2%$3K$1K to $13K0.8%$3K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Marcos Gonzales24.5%$3K$1K to $17K2.0%$3K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Simeon German23.6%$4K$1K to $20K3.1%$4K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Gabe Hernandez9.4%$3K$1K to $10K2.0%$3K in all four$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Cassius Bonjasky5.9%$1K$0 to $3K0.5%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Chase Williams1.8%$1K$0 to $3K0.5%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Logan Menefee0.9%$1K$0 to $3K0.5%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jameson Heck0.2%$1K$0 to $3K0.5%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Rowan Irelan0.2%$1K$0 to $3K0.5%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Aidan Alexander0.0%$1K$0 to $3K0.5%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jack Walter0.0%$1K$0 to $3K0.5%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$205K$76K to $550K100%$195K to $215K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Citadel Military College of South Carolina (NCAA Division I-FCS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$2,195,887
Men's basketball expenses$2,020,125
Athletics department expenses$20,021,006
Athletics department revenue$23,010,489

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 30 games, 1,982 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points2,0492,367
Field goals made721849
Field goals attempted1,7211,716
3-pointers made263277
3-pointers attempted823756
Free throws made344392
Free throws attempted517571
Offensive rebounds303302
Defensive rebounds658782
Total rebounds9611,084
Assists365443
Blocks7596
Turnovers323292
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 157.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 502.
Minutes (derived)6,125not published

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,0492,0490±10.20
Field goals madeReconciled7217210±3.60
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,7211,7210±8.60
3-pointers madeReconciled2632630±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled8238230±4.10
Free throws madeReconciled3443440±2.00
Free throws attemptedReconciled5175170±2.60
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown961845+116±76.90
AssistsReconciled3653650±2.00
BlocksReconciled75750±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown323304+19±9.70
StealsNo team figurenot published157not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published502not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,1256,112+13.3±122.50

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Sola Adebisi76.4%-1.1range -2.3 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Braxton Williams75.3%-1.8range -3.2 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Carter Kingsbury69.0%-2.5range -3.5 to -1.2Sufficient evidence
Eze Wali63.2%-2.5range -4.0 to -1.0Sufficient evidence
Christian Moore58.4%-1.4range -2.9 to -0.1Sufficient evidence
Logan Applegate38.5%+1.0range -0.2 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Keynan Davis27.4%-1.7range -2.8 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Dante Kearse25.2%-3.5range -4.8 to -2.3Sufficient evidence
Marcos Gonzales24.5%-2.7range -3.8 to -1.4Sufficient evidence
Simeon German23.6%-2.2range -3.2 to -0.9Sufficient evidence
Gabe Hernandez9.4%-1.4range -2.1 to -0.9Limited evidence
Cassius Bonjasky5.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Chase Williams1.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Logan Menefee0.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jameson Heck0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Rowan Irelan0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Aidan Alexander0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jack Walter0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+7.6range +6.7 to +8.5Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 98.2% of on-court time. 7 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.8%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.9%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value