Fordham

A-10 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 146 · Raw net 1.9 · Tempo 64.5 · 29 Division I games · Through 2026-03-12

Record: 14–15; 14 wins
AdjNet: 0.5β; rank 168 of 365
AdjO: 104.6β; rank 258 of 365
AdjD: 104.1β; rank 76 of 365
AdjT: 65.6β
SOS: -1.3β; rank 205 of 363
NCSOS: -12.5β
WAB: -8.3β; rank 187 of 363
RR: -1.7β
Exp. W: 15.7β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	104.2266	102.449	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	48.6301	49.995	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.2218	17.2137	16.7
Offensive rebound %	34.165	26.830	30.6
FTA / FGA %	26.4354	30.370	35.0
Shooting
3P%	28.9357	33.4151	33.9
2P%	51.9169	49.891	51.7
FT%	70.2265	68.39	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	38.3	42.4	39.5
Assists / FGM %	52.4	60.7	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	6.8	8.5	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	28.6	35.2	31.4
2-pointers %	55.3	47.6	48.8
Free throws %	16.0	17.2	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.3
Top Three Share of Minutes: 48%
Bench Share of Minutes: 31%
Players with Logged Minutes: 16

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-04	NJIT	L 61–72	64.7	Home	0–1
11-11	Wagner	W 63–61	58.9	Home	1–1
11-14	Iona	L 71–76	69.7	Away	1–2
11-20	LIU	W 69–53	66.3	Home	2–2
11-29	UAlbany	W 88–68	67.6	Neutral	3–2
11-30	Colgate	L 62–72	64.3	Neutral	3–3
12-06	Holy Cross	L 69–70	64.2	Home	3–4
12-10	FDU	W 75–54	64.2	Home	4–4
12-13	Manhattan	W 82–53	65.1	Home	5–4
12-22	New Haven	W 65–47	63.4	Home	6–4
12-31	Dayton	L 56–63	62.7	Away	6–5
01-04	Richmond	L 75–83	63.0	Home	6–6
01-07	George Mason	L 58–67	62.5	Home	6–7
01-10	St. Bonaventure	W 81–77	66.7	Away	7–7
01-14	Saint Louis	L 56–78	60.9	Away	7–8
01-17	Duquesne	L 63–74	71.0	Home	7–9
01-21	Davidson	L 63–68	65.2	Away	7–10
01-28	La Salle	W 64–58	61.2	Home	8–10
01-31	George Washington	W 79–65	67.9	Away	9–10
02-03	VCU	L 59–63	64.0	Home	9–11
02-07	St. Bonaventure	L 67–70	62.0	Home	9–12
02-10	Saint Joseph's	W 68–64	63.7	Away	10–12
02-14	Rhode Island	W 70–66 1OT	69.1	Away	11–12
02-18	Loyola Chicago	W 62–59	67.1	Home	12–12
02-21	Davidson	W 63–59	60.0	Home	13–12
02-28	VCU	L 63–82	68.2	Away	13–13
03-04	La Salle	L 84–87	67.6	Away	13–14
03-07	Rhode Island	W 61–49	64.6	Home	14–14
03-12	George Washington	L 62–66	63.8	Neutral	14–15

Roster · 16 players

Player logs in 29 of 29 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
DeJour Reaves	29	34:36	86.1%	522	124	105	54	6	69	54	168–314	53.5%	28–107	26.2%	102–118	86.4%	49.9%	55.2%	28.0%	5	34:34 −0:03	86.4%	20.2 +2.2
Rikus Schulte	29	31:15	77.8%	303	266	43	43	17	53	79	120–203	59.1%	6–27	22.2%†	45–75	60.0%	56.1%	57.6%	32.6%	5	32:50 +1:35	82.1%	10.6 +0.2
Akira Jacobs	29	29:13	72.7%	209	139	24	11	2	18	68	27–52	51.9%	44–129	34.1%	23–29	79.3%	51.4%	53.9%	16.0%	5	29:28 +0:15	73.7%	7.2 0.0
Christian Henry	27	28:56	67.1%	299	87	137	36	2	72	51	72–166	43.4%	30–112	26.8%	65–115	56.5%	42.1%	45.5%	41.4%	5	29:33 +0:37	73.9%	6.8 −4.3
Louis Lesmond	25	19:07	41.0%	77	51	20	8	3	19	23	18–43	41.9%	12–59	20.3%	5–9	55.6%†	35.3%	36.3%	8.8%	5	17:15 −1:52	43.1%	2.8 −0.3
Abass Bodija	24	19:43	40.6%	167	116	13	13	11	23	45	52–105	49.5%	6–20	30.0%†	45–58	77.6%	48.8%	55.5%	46.4%	5	20:54 +1:11	52.3%	8.6 +1.6
Marcus Greene	28	15:04	36.2%	112	23	14	11	3	9	41	17–29	58.6%	25–80	31.3%	3–6	50.0%†	50.0%	50.2%	5.5%	5	10:23 −4:41	26.0%	5.2 +1.2
Roor Akhuar	22	19:08	36.1%	125	74	7	14	12	15	51	15–25	60.0%	30–83	36.1%	5–11	45.5%†	55.6%	55.4%	10.2%	5	21:32 +2:24	53.8%	5.2 −0.5
Jack Whitbourn	11	23:42	22.4%	92	92	8	5	3	13	17	37–75	49.3%†	2–10	20.0%†	12–14	85.7%†	47.1%†	50.5%†	16.5%†	—	—	—	—
Kingston Price	19	6:22	10.4%	25	7	7	4	0	5	18	8–12	66.7%†	3–12	25.0%†	0–0	—	52.1%†	52.1%†	0.0%†	3	4:04 −2:18	6.1%	0.0 −1.3
Ryan PettisFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	9:39	3.3%	5	7	3	1	2	1	6	1–2	50.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	0–0	—	41.7%†	41.7%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Zarique NutterFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	26:24	2.3%	15	6	0	1	2	0	2	5–13	38.5%†	0–3	0.0%†	5–8	62.5%†	31.3%†	38.4%†	50.0%†	—	—	—	—
Jameson O'TooleFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	2:00	1.0%	2	2	1	1	0	0	1	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	2–2	100.0%†	0.0%†	53.2%†	200.0%†	1	2:42 +0:42	1.4%	0.0 −0.3
Jace HowardFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	7:20	0.6%	2	1	0	0	0	1	2	1–1	100.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	50.0%†	50.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Aidan CrottyFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	0:44	0.2%	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Max MillerFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	0:33	0.2%	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	29 games			1959	1077	382	not published	63	323	not published	542–1044	51.9%	187–648	28.9%	314–447	70.2%	48.6%	51.9%	26.4%
Sum of players				1955	995	382	203	63	298	459	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				+4	+82	0	not published	0	+25	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $885K; 80% Range $395K to $1.95M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $850K to $1.00M; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 16; 6 floor only

The widest scenario range, $450K to $2.20M, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
DeJour Reaves	86.3%	$145K	$51K to $350K	17.2%	$140K to $165K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rikus Schulte	78.5%	$265K	$100K to $710K	27.5%	$250K to $300K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Akira Jacobs	73.6%	$83K	$17K to $215K	11.5%	$80K to $94K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Christian Henry	66.8%	$100K	$28K to $255K	12.6%	$97K to $115K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Abass Bodija	41.3%	$38K	$6K to $115K	5.6%	$37K to $43K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Louis Lesmond	38.7%	$16K	$3K to $73K	2.3%	$16K to $19K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Roor Akhuar	36.7%	$60K	$20K to $155K	7.4%	$58K to $69K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Marcus Greene	36.1%	$31K	$5K to $96K	4.5%	$29K to $35K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jack Whitbourn	24.1%	$31K	$7K to $83K	4.1%	$30K to $35K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kingston Price	10.6%	$13K	$4K to $33K	1.7%	$12K to $14K	$5K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ryan Pettis	2.7%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.6%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Zarique Nutter	2.5%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.6%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jameson O'Toole	1.1%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.6%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jace Howard	0.6%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.6%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Aidan Crotty	0.2%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.6%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Max Miller	0.2%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.6%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$885K	$395K to $1.95M	100%	$850K to $1.00M	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Fordham University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$8,756,051	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$8,756,051
Athletics department expenses	$47,556,052
Athletics department revenue	$47,556,052

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 29 games, 1,879 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	1,959	1,924
Field goals made	729	684
Field goals attempted	1,692	1,596
3-pointers made	187	226
3-pointers attempted	648	676
Free throws made	314	330
Free throws attempted	447	483
Offensive rebounds	351	266
Defensive rebounds	726	678
Total rebounds	1,077	944
Assists	382	415
Blocks	63	89
Turnovers	323	323
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 203.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 459.
Minutes (derived)	5,825	not published

29 of 29 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	1,959	1,955	+4	±9.8	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	729	728	+1	±3.6	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,692	1,688	+4	±8.5	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	187	187	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	648	648	0	±3.2	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	314	312	+2	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	447	445	+2	±2.2	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Reconciled	1,077	995	+82	±86.2	0
Assists	Reconciled	382	382	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	63	63	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	323	298	+25	±9.7	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	203	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	459	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,825	5,803	+22.0	±116.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
DeJour Reaves	86.3%	+1.5range +0.3 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Rikus Schulte	78.5%	+3.5range +2.6 to +4.7Sufficient evidence
Akira Jacobs	73.6%	+0.4range -0.5 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Christian Henry	66.8%	+1.1range -0.3 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Abass Bodija	41.3%	-0.3range -1.5 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Louis Lesmond	38.7%	-1.8range -2.8 to -0.7Sufficient evidence
Roor Akhuar	36.7%	+1.2range +0.1 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Marcus Greene	36.1%	-0.3range -1.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Jack Whitbourn	24.1%	+0.5range -0.9 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Kingston Price	10.6%	-0.4range -1.3 to +0.3Limited evidence
Ryan Pettis	2.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Zarique Nutter	2.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jameson O'Toole	1.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jace Howard	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Aidan Crotty	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Max Miller	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.3range +9.3 to +11.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.5% of on-court time. 6 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.5%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.1%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value