Fordham

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Fordham, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
DeJour Reaves	86.3%	+1.5range +0.3 to +2.5Sufficient evidence	+5.6range +4.9 to +6.2Sufficient evidence	$145KspeculativeLoading	$51K to $350KLoading
Rikus Schulte	78.5%	+3.5range +2.6 to +4.7Sufficient evidence	+6.1range +5.5 to +6.6Sufficient evidence	$265KspeculativeLoading	$100K to $710KLoading
Akira Jacobs	73.6%	+0.4range -0.5 to +1.3Sufficient evidence	+4.4range +3.8 to +4.9Sufficient evidence	$83KspeculativeLoading	$17K to $215KLoading
Christian Henry	66.8%	+1.1range -0.3 to +2.3Sufficient evidence	+4.3range +3.7 to +4.8Sufficient evidence	$100KspeculativeLoading	$28K to $255KLoading
Abass Bodija	41.3%	-0.3range -1.5 to +1.1Sufficient evidence	+2.3range +1.9 to +2.7Sufficient evidence	$38KspeculativeLoading	$6K to $115KLoading
Louis Lesmond	38.7%	-1.8range -2.8 to -0.7Sufficient evidence	+1.8range +1.5 to +2.1Sufficient evidence	$16KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $73KLoading
Roor Akhuar	36.7%	+1.2range +0.1 to +2.3Sufficient evidence	+2.4range +2.1 to +2.6Sufficient evidence	$60KspeculativeLoading	$20K to $155KLoading
Marcus Greene	36.1%	-0.3range -1.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidence	+2.0range +1.7 to +2.3Sufficient evidence	$31KspeculativeLoading	$5K to $96KLoading
Jack Whitbourn	24.1%	+0.5range -0.9 to +1.6Sufficient evidence	+1.4range +1.2 to +1.7Sufficient evidence	$31KspeculativeLoading	$7K to $83KLoading
Kingston Price	10.6%	-0.4range -1.3 to +0.3Limited evidence	+0.6range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidence	$13KspeculativeLoading	$4K to $33KLoading
Ryan Pettis	2.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$5Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$2K to $13KLoading
Zarique Nutter	2.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$5Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$2K to $13KLoading
Jameson O'Toole	1.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$5Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$2K to $13KLoading
Jace Howard	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$5Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$2K to $13KLoading
Aidan Crotty	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$5Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$2K to $13KLoading
Max Miller	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$5Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$2K to $13KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $885K; 80% Range $395K to $1.95M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $850K to $1.00M; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 16; 6 floor only

The widest scenario range, $450K to $2.20M, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
DeJour Reaves	86.3%	$145K	$51K to $350K	17.2%	$140K to $165K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rikus Schulte	78.5%	$265K	$100K to $710K	27.5%	$250K to $300K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Akira Jacobs	73.6%	$83K	$17K to $215K	11.5%	$80K to $94K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Christian Henry	66.8%	$100K	$28K to $255K	12.6%	$97K to $115K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Abass Bodija	41.3%	$38K	$6K to $115K	5.6%	$37K to $43K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Louis Lesmond	38.7%	$16K	$3K to $73K	2.3%	$16K to $19K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Roor Akhuar	36.7%	$60K	$20K to $155K	7.4%	$58K to $69K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Marcus Greene	36.1%	$31K	$5K to $96K	4.5%	$29K to $35K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jack Whitbourn	24.1%	$31K	$7K to $83K	4.1%	$30K to $35K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kingston Price	10.6%	$13K	$4K to $33K	1.7%	$12K to $14K	$5K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ryan Pettis	2.7%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.6%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Zarique Nutter	2.5%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.6%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jameson O'Toole	1.1%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.6%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jace Howard	0.6%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.6%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Aidan Crotty	0.2%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.6%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Max Miller	0.2%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.6%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$885K	$395K to $1.95M	100%	$850K to $1.00M	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Fordham University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$8,756,051	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$8,756,051
Athletics department expenses	$47,556,052
Athletics department revenue	$47,556,052

Coverage and exclusions

27 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (93%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

2 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue	$8,756,051	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$8,756,051	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
1 day	1
3 or more days	27

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	1
Longest run of consecutive away games	2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology