DeJour Reaves
Fordham · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1003:37 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 34:36
- Points per game
- 18.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.3 / 3.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 18.0 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 20.8 | 4.9 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 2.2 |
| Season totals | 522 | 124 | 105 | 54 | 6 | 69 | 54 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 196–421 | 46.6% | 14.5 | 16.8 |
| 2P | 168–314 | 53.5% | 10.8 | 12.5 |
| 3P | 28–107 | 26.2% | 3.7 | 4.3 |
| FT | 102–118 | 86.4% | 4.1 | 4.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.9% | 55.2% | 25.4% | 28.0% | 1.52 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Fordham · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $145K
- 80% range $51K to $350K
- Median share of team pool
- 17.2%
- team pool $885K, 80% range $395K to $1.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $140K to $165K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $5K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 86.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Fordham: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Fordham | $145Kspeculative | $51K to $350K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.5 | +0.3 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | +0.7 | +5.6range +4.9 to +6.2 | 3,026 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Iona | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.9 | +0.3 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | -0.6 | +5.7range +5.2 to +6.4 | 1,493 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | N Colorado | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.7 | -2.9 to -0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -2.6 | +2.0range +1.4 to +2.7 | 2,573 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:34 | 34:36 | 24:18–38:53 | |
| Points | 20.2 | 18.0 | 11.0–31.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 56.1% | 50.5% | 26.7%–73.1% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-12 | George Washington | L 62–66 | 38:53 | 23 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9-16 | 0-3 | 5-6 | 56.3% |
| 2026-03-07 | Rhode Island | W 61–49 | 36:04 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 8-8 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-04 | La Salle | L 84–87 | 32:29 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7-14 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | VCU | L 63–82 | 35:04 | 22 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 8-16 | 0-3 | 6-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Davidson | W 63–59 | 30:19 | 21 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6-10 | 0-2 | 9-10 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Loyola Chicago | W 62–59 | 35:19 | 24 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7-12 | 1-3 | 9-9 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-14 | Rhode Island | W 70–66 | 37:25 | 19 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-15 | 1-3 | 6-6 | 43.3% |
| 2026-02-10 | Saint Joseph's | W 68–64 | 32:04 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-13 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 34.6% |
| 2026-02-07 | St. Bonaventure | L 67–70 | 35:45 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 4-5 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-03 | VCU | L 59–63 | 35:15 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8-16 | 1-3 | 4-5 | 53.1% |
| 2026-01-31 | George Washington | W 79–65 | 35:10 | 19 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8-18 | 0-5 | 3-4 | 44.4% |
| 2026-01-28 | La Salle | W 64–58 | 35:36 | 11 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-14 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 32.1% |
| 2026-01-21 | Davidson | L 63–68 | 35:40 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 9-14 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | Duquesne | L 63–74 | 36:50 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8-18 | 0-5 | 1-2 | 44.4% |
| 2026-01-14 | Saint Louis | L 56–78 | 34:03 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-15 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | St. Bonaventure | W 81–77 | 35:04 | 31 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9-17 | 1-1 | 12-12 | 55.9% |
| 2026-01-07 | George Mason | L 58–67 | 35:31 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6-19 | 1-5 | 3-5 | 34.2% |
| 2026-01-04 | Richmond | L 75–83 | 33:39 | 19 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-14 | 1-4 | 4-5 | 53.6% |
| 2025-12-31 | Dayton | L 56–63 | 38:03 | 18 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7-17 | 1-8 | 3-6 | 44.1% |
| 2025-12-22 | New Haven | W 65–47 | 34:47 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9-13 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 73.1% |
| 2025-12-13 | Manhattan | W 82–53 | 35:47 | 18 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8-15 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | FDU | W 75–54 | 34:21 | 16 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 6-14 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 46.4% |
| 2025-12-06 | Holy Cross | L 69–70 | 35:52 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 4-15 | 0-4 | 4-4 | 26.7% |
| 2025-11-30 | Colgate | L 62–72 | 33:09 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-13 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 38.5% |
| 2025-11-29 | UAlbany | W 88–68 | 34:11 | 17 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7-13 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 65.4% |
| 2025-11-20 | LIU | W 69–53 | 24:18 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-15 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Iona | L 71–76 | 34:10 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-20 | 0-5 | 4-4 | 45.0% |
| 2025-11-11 · NCAA | Wagner | W 63–61 | 36:06 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-14 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 35.7% |
| 2025-11-04 | NJIT | L 61–72 | 32:43 | 21 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9-15 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 70.0% |