Cornell

Ivy · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 149 · Raw net 1.6 · Tempo 71.3 · 26 Division I games · Through 2026-03-14

Record: 13–13; 13 wins
AdjNet: 2.1β; rank 140 of 365
AdjO: 118.1β; rank 36 of 365
AdjD: 116.0β; rank 336 of 365
AdjT: 71.6β
SOS: 0.9β; rank 133 of 363
NCSOS: 1.9β
WAB: -6.6β; rank 141 of 363
RR: -0.8β
Exp. W: 13.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	119.221	117.6344	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	58.57	55.9343	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	16.0139	15.1280	16.7
Offensive rebound %	30.2194	30.6186	30.6
FTA / FGA %	30.2304	37.2244	35.0
Shooting
3P%	38.314	37.5349	33.9
2P%	59.710	55.7320	51.7
FT%	74.1125	71.7138	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	51.6	38.3	39.5
Assists / FGM %	66.7	56.7	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	7.3	9.7	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	42.5	31.1	31.4
2-pointers %	41.4	49.6	48.8
Free throws %	16.1	19.3	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 10.4
Top Three Share of Minutes: 39%
Bench Share of Minutes: 40%
Players with Logged Minutes: 17

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-07	Kent St.	L 102–110	79.1	Away	0–1
11-09	Illinois St.	L 65–76	72.5	Away	0–2
11-13	Lafayette	W 97–78	75.2	Away	1–2
11-18	Army West Point	W 86–73	78.3	Home	2–2
11-20	Colgate	W 95–94 2OT	91.7	Home	3–2
11-30	Bucknell	W 101–72	73.8	Away	4–2
12-02	George Mason	L 81–99	72.5	Away	4–3
12-03	Towson	L 80–93	68.8	Away	4–4
12-07	Samford	L 90–93	76.6	Away	4–5
12-21	UAlbany	W 83–75	60.5	Away	5–5
12-29	Michigan St.	L 97–114	83.2	Away	5–6
01-05	Columbia	L 99–104	82.6	Home	5–7
01-10	Dartmouth	L 91–102	75.2	Home	5–8
01-17	Yale	L 68–102	70.8	Away	5–9
01-19	Brown	W 89–67	70.6	Away	6–9
01-24	Harvard	W 86–79	65.4	Away	7–9
01-30	Princeton	W 87–64	61.5	Home	8–9
01-31	Penn	L 81–91	72.1	Home	8–10
02-07	Columbia	W 88–67	65.7	Away	9–10
02-13	Princeton	W 89–65	63.3	Away	10–10
02-14	Penn	L 76–82	76.2	Away	10–11
02-21	Harvard	L 54–73	60.1	Home	10–12
02-27	Yale	W 72–69	64.3	Home	11–12
02-28	Brown	W 86–80	72.2	Home	12–12
03-07	Dartmouth	W 111–90	77.9	Away	13–12
03-14	Yale	L 76–88	60.7	Neutral	13–13

Roster · 17 players

Player logs in 26 of 26 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Cooper Noard	26	28:47	71.3%	493	86	49	10	7	42	39	89–129	69.0%	77–205	37.6%	84–93	90.3%	61.2%	65.7%	27.8%	5	28:37 −0:09	71.6%	15.8 −3.2
Adam Hinton	26	25:34	63.3%	331	81	45	20	13	33	64	65–120	54.2%	52–128	40.6%	45–58	77.6%	57.7%	60.5%	23.4%	5	23:36 −1:58	59.0%	10.0 −2.7
Jacob Beccles	26	24:04	59.6%	202	66	84	30	7	36	55	57–105	54.3%	19–58	32.8%	31–48	64.6%	52.5%	54.9%	29.4%	5	25:38 +1:33	64.1%	10.6 +2.8
Jake Fiegen	22	27:22	57.4%	383	114	45	21	8	25	55	86–129	66.7%	50–123	40.7%	61–79	77.2%	63.9%	66.8%	31.3%	5	29:24 +2:02	73.5%	17.8 +0.4
Kaspar Sepp	26	19:00	47.0%	124	140	68	13	5	33	69	38–71	53.5%†	5–20	25.0%†	33–51	64.7%	50.0%†	54.7%†	56.0%†	5	20:27 +1:27	51.1%	2.8 −2.0
Josh Baldwin	25	19:31	46.5%	193	106	80	12	12	44	50	42–79	53.2%	20–59	33.9%	49–70	70.0%	52.2%	57.2%	50.7%	5	21:14 +1:43	53.1%	6.6 −1.1
Anthony Nimani	21	17:26	34.9%	111	35	38	12	0	21	37	28–47	59.6%†	11–22	50.0%†	22–26	84.6%	64.5%†	69.0%†	37.7%†	5	18:50 +1:24	47.1%	8.2 +2.9
DJ Nix	25	12:13	29.1%	72	42	28	4	12	17	24	13–27	48.1%†	13–44	29.5%†	7–14	50.0%†	45.8%†	46.7%†	19.7%†	5	8:00 −4:13	20.0%	1.4 −1.5
Corbin Zentner	22	12:03	25.2%	72	20	17	5	0	6	20	4–7	57.1%†	20–54	37.0%	4–6	66.7%†	55.7%†	56.6%†	9.8%†	5	8:30 −3:33	21.3%	2.2 −1.1
Gioacchino Panzini	25	9:59	23.8%	60	45	14	10	7	14	45	16–22	72.7%†	7–18	38.9%†	7–15	46.7%†	66.3%†	64.4%†	37.5%†	5	8:19 −1:39	20.8%	1.4 −1.0
DaMaryon Fishburn	19	7:21	13.3%	35	24	19	9	0	12	22	10–12	83.3%†	3–7	42.9%†	6–10	60.0%†	76.3%†	74.8%†	52.6%†	2	4:27 −2:53	4.5%	1.5 −0.3
Mateen Rafiq	17	7:42	12.5%	67	14	14	2	0	4	11	7–10	70.0%†	16–30	53.3%†	5–7	71.4%†	77.5%†	77.8%†	17.5%†	4	3:45 −3:57	7.5%	2.3 −1.7
Ian ImegwuUnder 100 minutes	13	4:58	6.1%	55	15	12	0	0	2	9	3–7	42.9%†	16–35	45.7%†	1–2	50.0%†	64.3%†	64.1%†	4.8%†	—	—	—	—
Jax AbalosUnder 100 minutes	10	4:27	4.2%	22	3	3	0	0	0	6	2–2	100.0%†	5–15	33.3%†	3–3	100.0%†	55.9%†	60.0%†	17.6%†	2	5:27 +1:00	5.4%	1.5 −0.7
Ryan BurbachFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	7:47	3.0%	5	4	0	2	0	1	7	1–4	25.0%†	1–6	16.7%†	0–0	—	25.0%†	25.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
AJ LaBeauFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	2:06	1.6%	2	4	3	0	1	1	2	1–3	33.3%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	25.0%†	22.5%†	25.0%†	1	0:53 −1:13	0.4%	0.0 −0.3
Ty IwanonkiwFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	2:34	0.2%	3	0	0	0	0	0	1	0–0	—	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	150.0%†	150.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	26 games			2230	882	519	not published	72	299	not published	462–774	59.7%	316–826	38.3%	358–483	74.1%	58.5%	61.5%	30.2%
Sum of players				2230	799	519	150	72	291	516	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+83	0	not published	0	+8	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Cornell University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,608,946
Men's basketball expenses	$1,523,103
Athletics department expenses	$46,719,601
Athletics department revenue	$50,418,895

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 26 games, 1,871 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,230	2,200
Field goals made	778	774
Field goals attempted	1,600	1,589
3-pointers made	316	228
3-pointers attempted	826	608
Free throws made	358	424
Free throws attempted	483	591
Offensive rebounds	266	272
Defensive rebounds	616	615
Total rebounds	882	887
Assists	519	439
Blocks	72	75
Turnovers	299	282
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 150.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 516.
Minutes (derived)	5,250	not published

26 of 26 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,230	2,230	0	±11.2	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	778	778	0	±3.9	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,600	1,600	0	±8.0	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	316	316	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	826	826	0	±4.1	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	358	358	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	483	483	0	±2.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	882	799	+83	±70.6	0
Assists	Reconciled	519	519	0	±2.6	0
Blocks	Reconciled	72	72	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Reconciled	299	291	+8	±9.0	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	150	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	516	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,250	5,239	+11.3	±105.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Cooper Noard	71.6%	+0.5range -0.6 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Adam Hinton	64.2%	+1.2range -0.1 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Jacob Beccles	60.8%	+0.9range -0.5 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Jake Fiegen	56.1%	+2.4range +1.2 to +3.7Sufficient evidence
Kaspar Sepp	47.0%	-0.1range -1.2 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Josh Baldwin	46.0%	+2.9range +1.6 to +4.3Sufficient evidence
Anthony Nimani	32.8%	+1.7range +0.6 to +2.7Sufficient evidence
DJ Nix	29.6%	-1.9range -3.1 to -0.7Sufficient evidence
Gioacchino Panzini	24.5%	-0.9range -2.4 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Corbin Zentner	24.5%	+1.0range +0.2 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
DaMaryon Fishburn	13.5%	+0.2range -0.8 to +1.3Limited evidence
Mateen Rafiq	13.1%	+3.1range +2.4 to +3.8Limited evidence
Ian Imegwu	6.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jax Abalos	4.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Ryan Burbach	3.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
AJ LaBeau	1.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Ty Iwanonkiw	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.1range +9.3 to +11.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

12 valued players hold 96.7% of on-court time. 5 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 3.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 5.3%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value