UIC

MVC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 110 · Raw net 4.0 · Tempo 67.1 · 33 Division I games · Through 2026-03-18

Record: 17–16; 17 wins
AdjNet: 5.0β; rank 101 of 365
AdjO: 109.4β; rank 146 of 365
AdjD: 104.3β; rank 83 of 365
AdjT: 67.4β
SOS: 2.0β; rank 106 of 363
NCSOS: -1.0β
WAB: -7.2β; rank 159 of 363
RR: -1.6β
Exp. W: 18.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	108.6168	104.680	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	49.8244	50.5124	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.6244	19.731	16.7
Offensive rebound %	36.322	32.0255	30.6
FTA / FGA %	36.2146	33.9149	35.0
Shooting
3P%	31.6301	33.4147	33.9
2P%	51.0213	50.8130	51.7
FT%	72.5188	74.4288	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	32.8	46.4	39.5
Assists / FGM %	53.8	65.8	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	12.0	10.4	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	24.7	36.9	31.4
2-pointers %	54.4	43.1	48.8
Free throws %	20.9	20.0	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.2
Top Three Share of Minutes: 39%
Bench Share of Minutes: 39%
Players with Logged Minutes: 12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Detroit Mercy	W 91–71	79.3	Home	1–0
11-07	Oregon St.	L 73–76	68.9	Away	1–1
11-15	Chicago St.	W 67–63	63.5	Away	2–1
11-20	High Point	L 80–90	73.0	Neutral	2–2
11-22	Southern Ind.	W 84–73	73.6	Neutral	3–2
11-26	Robert Morris	L 74–88	67.6	Away	3–3
12-03	Ark.-Pine Bluff	L 62–63	72.1	Home	3–4
12-07	Yale	L 66–80	65.2	Away	3–5
12-13	Belmont	L 84–87	63.8	Away	3–6
12-17	UNI	L 54–60	61.2	Home	3–7
12-21	Charlotte	L 76–88 1OT	71.3	Away	3–8
01-01	Murray St.	L 77–81	73.4	Home	3–9
01-04	Valparaiso	L 59–66	62.0	Away	3–10
01-07	Southern Ill.	W 70–57	64.7	Home	4–10
01-10	Illinois St.	W 63–59 1OT	69.3	Away	5–10
01-13	UNI	W 69–61	62.6	Away	6–10
01-17	Drake	W 74–67	66.3	Home	7–10
01-20	Evansville	W 76–49	67.1	Home	8–10
01-24	Bradley	W 85–70	65.5	Away	9–10
01-27	Indiana St.	W 76–74	67.7	Home	10–10
01-31	Southern Ill.	W 68–66	65.9	Away	11–10
02-03	Murray St.	L 74–81	75.1	Away	11–11
02-06	Belmont	L 62–68	63.3	Home	11–12
02-12	Drake	W 80–70	65.6	Away	12–12
02-15	Illinois St.	W 83–56	72.8	Home	13–12
02-18	Evansville	W 84–46	64.6	Away	14–12
02-21	Valparaiso	L 67–71	64.2	Home	14–13
02-24	Bradley	W 93–86 2OT	78.3	Home	15–13
03-01	Indiana St.	L 63–79	67.5	Away	15–14
03-06	Murray St.	W 92–79	78.9	Neutral	16–14
03-07	Drake	W 72–51	62.1	Neutral	17–14
03-08	UNI	L 69–84	59.2	Neutral	17–15
03-18	California	L 73–91	71.2	—	17–16

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 31 of 33 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Andy Johnson	31	29:10	67.5%	15.7	4.6	2.3	1.1	0.3	1.9	2.1	52–133	39.1%	50–144	34.7%	101–116	87.1%	45.8%	54.1%	41.9%	4	30:32 +1:21	61.0%	7.3 −4.2
Mekhi Lowery	31	26:21	61.0%	11.8	8.7	3.2	2.1	1.1	2.1	5.0	95–195	48.7%	0–0	—	50–81	61.7%	48.7%	52.0%	41.5%	4	27:51 +1:31	55.7%	9.5 +1.8
Rashund Washington Jr	31	23:40	54.7%	15.3	8.8	1.0	0.9	0.7	1.9	2.0	80–122	65.6%	26–79	32.9%	43–59	72.9%	59.2%	61.9%	29.4%	4	29:50 +6:11	59.7%	16.3 +7.2
Abdul Momoh	31	23:35	54.6%	13.2	6.3	1.5	0.9	2.1	1.6	3.4	102–169	60.4%	0–0	—	37–75	49.3%	60.4%	59.7%	44.4%	4	23:44 +0:09	47.5%	6.5 −1.3
Ahmad Henderson II	31	21:22	49.4%	22.2	3.0	3.8	1.5	0.2	3.6	3.7	78–171	45.6%	35–128	27.3%	107–123	87.0%	43.6%	52.1%	41.1%	4	16:54 −4:28	33.8%	10.5 −1.4
Sam Silverstein	31	20:49	48.2%	5.6	8.7	3.5	2.3	0.3	1.7	3.7	35–67	52.2%†	1–10	10.0%†	18–35	51.4%	47.4%†	49.2%†	45.5%†	4	16:19 −4:30	32.6%	1.8 −1.2
Jayce Nathaniel	31	20:05	46.5%	12.1	9.0	2.1	1.0	0.8	1.3	3.3	59–115	51.3%	12–50	24.0%	34–50	68.0%	46.7%	50.3%	30.3%	4	14:52 −5:14	29.7%	3.5 −2.6
Elijah Crawford	21	25:34	40.1%	21.9	4.5	7.7	2.2	0.4	4.2	3.1	89–172	51.7%	21–70	30.0%	53–73	72.6%	49.8%	53.6%	30.2%	4	30:57 +5:23	61.9%	18.3 +4.3
Josiah Hammons	30	14:30	32.5%	16.8	3.2	1.2	1.4	0.3	1.1	4.3	9–26	34.6%	46–120	38.3%	27–34	79.4%	53.4%	56.8%	23.3%	3	5:37 −8:53	8.4%	2.7 −3.4
Ante Beljan	22	6:31	10.7%	14.2	5.0	0.8	0.8	0.8	4.2	6.4	23–39	59.0%†	0–0	—	5–10	50.0%†	59.0%†	58.8%†	25.6%†	3	3:59 −2:33	6.0%	1.3 −1.0
Tai Walters-WhitakerUnder 100 minutes	13	3:45	3.6%	7.4	3.3	3.3	1.6	0.8	1.6	3.3	3–11	27.3%†	1–3	33.3%†	0–0	—	32.1%†	32.1%†	0.0%†	2	0:35 −3:10	0.6%	0.0 −0.7
Carlos Harris IIIFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	2:17	0.2%	0.0	0.0	17.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	31 games			73.0	35.8	14.0	not published	3.6	11.7	not published	625–1220	51.2%	192–604	31.8%	475–656	72.4%	50.1%	54.5%	36.0%
Sum of players				73.0	31.9	13.9	7.3	3.6	10.9	17.0	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.8	+0.0	not published	+0.1	+0.8	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $630K; 80% Range $280K to $1.45M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $605K to $680K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 12; 2 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Andy Johnson	72.3%	$75K	$24K to $190K	13.2%	$73K to $82K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mekhi Lowery	65.0%	$74K	$22K to $190K	12.3%	$72K to $81K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rashund Washington Jr	59.1%	$58K	$15K to $150K	10.3%	$57K to $64K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Abdul Momoh	58.0%	$105K	$43K to $265K	15.7%	$100K to $115K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ahmad Henderson II	52.6%	$39K	$7K to $115K	7.4%	$37K to $42K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Sam Silverstein	50.7%	$48K	$12K to $130K	8.8%	$47K to $52K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jayce Nathaniel	49.8%	$43K	$10K to $120K	8.0%	$42K to $47K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Elijah Crawford	43.0%	$100K	$40K to $275K	15.0%	$98K to $110K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Josiah Hammons	34.2%	$25K	$5K to $72K	4.8%	$24K to $27K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ante Beljan	11.2%	$9K	$3K to $24K	1.5%	$8K to $9K	$5K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tai Walters-Whitaker	4.0%	$5K	$2K to $12K	0.8%	$5K in all four	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Carlos Harris III	0.2%	$5K	$2K to $12K	0.8%	$5K in all four	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$630K	$280K to $1.45M	100%	$605K to $680K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Illinois Chicago (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$4,010,459	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$4,010,459
Athletics department expenses	$24,065,208
Athletics department revenue	$25,194,099

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 33 games, 2,247 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1340 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	72.8	70.2
Field goals made	25.8	23.8
Field goals attempted	57.9	55.6
3-pointers made	6.0	8.6
3-pointers attempted	19.0	25.8
Free throws made	15.2	14.0
Free throws attempted	21.0	18.9
Offensive rebounds	12.5	10.7
Defensive rebounds	22.9	22.0
Total rebounds	35.4	32.8
Assists	13.9	15.6
Blocks	3.6	4.1
Turnovers	11.8	13.2
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 230.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 536.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

31 of 33 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,301	2,301	0	±11.5	139
Field goals made	Reconciled	817	817	0	±4.1	48
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,824	1,824	0	±9.1	114
3-pointers made	Reconciled	192	192	0	±2.0	9
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	604	604	0	±3.0	32
Free throws made	Reconciled	475	475	0	±2.4	34
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	656	656	0	±3.3	46
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,127	1,006	+121	±90.2	59
Assists	Reconciled	440	439	+1	±2.2	25
Blocks	Reconciled	114	112	+2	±2.0	6
Turnovers	Residual shown	370	344	+26	±11.1	26
Steals	No team figure	not published	230	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	536	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,300	6,282	+17.5	±126.0	400

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Andy Johnson	72.3%	+1.3range +0.1 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Mekhi Lowery	65.0%	+1.6range +0.1 to +3.4Sufficient evidence
Rashund Washington Jr	59.1%	+1.2range -0.2 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Abdul Momoh	58.0%	+3.3range +2.1 to +4.5Sufficient evidence
Ahmad Henderson II	52.6%	+0.4range -1.1 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Sam Silverstein	50.7%	+1.1range -0.6 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Jayce Nathaniel	49.8%	+0.9range -0.5 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Elijah Crawford	43.0%	+4.3range +3.2 to +5.2Sufficient evidence
Josiah Hammons	34.2%	+0.2range -1.3 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Ante Beljan	11.2%	-1.0range -1.8 to -0.3Limited evidence
Tai Walters-Whitaker	4.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Carlos Harris III	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.9range +10.0 to +11.7Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 99.2% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.8%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.2%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value

UIC