Nicholls

Slnd · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 270 · Raw net -6.9 · Tempo 68.3 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-09

Record: 13–19; 13 wins
AdjNet: -5.8β; rank 252 of 365
AdjO: 105.1β; rank 248 of 365
AdjD: 110.9β; rank 244 of 365
AdjT: 69.0β
SOS: 0.0β; rank 161 of 363
NCSOS: 8.1β
WAB: -11.7β; rank 254 of 363
RR: 1.0β
Exp. W: 12.0β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	103.9273	110.8236	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	50.6205	54.4310	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.4232	20.515	16.7
Offensive rebound %	28.1262	33.7314	30.6
FTA / FGA %	34.5194	37.9260	35.0
Shooting
3P%	33.3215	34.6223	33.9
2P%	51.2203	56.0325	51.7
FT%	66.2350	78.0364	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	43.9	38.7	39.5
Assists / FGM %	52.2	56.0	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.2	9.9	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	35.3	29.0	31.4
2-pointers %	46.3	49.6	48.8
Free throws %	18.4	21.4	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.8
Top Three Share of Minutes: 43%
Bench Share of Minutes: 34%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-04	Kentucky	L 51–77	70.0	Away	0–1
11-07	Eastern Ill.	L 57–65	69.8	Away	0–2
11-12	Valparaiso	L 63–68	63.0	Away	0–3
11-15	Murray St.	L 79–99	75.7	Away	0–4
11-22	Oklahoma St.	L 81–95	81.5	Away	0–5
11-28	Tulane	L 72–82	69.1	Away	0–6
12-02	Creighton	L 76–96	68.5	Away	0–7
12-06	UIW	W 74–67	65.2	Home	1–7
12-17	Houston Christian	W 79–64	69.0	Home	2–7
12-21	Pacific	L 82–95	72.0	Away	2–8
12-29	A&M-Corpus Christi	W 76–71	63.1	Away	3–8
12-31	UTRGV	W 71–69	69.5	Away	4–8
01-03	East Texas A&M	W 80–58	73.8	Home	5–8
01-05	Northwestern St.	W 74–72	69.3	Home	6–8
01-10	LSU New Orleans	W 90–77	62.5	Away	7–8
01-12	McNeese	L 68–94	74.6	Away	7–9
01-17	Lamar University	L 80–90	68.5	Home	7–10
01-19	SFA	L 62–79	65.8	Home	7–11
01-24	Southeastern La.	L 61–67	70.6	Away	7–12
01-27	LSU New Orleans	L 62–80	73.2	Home	7–13
01-31	East Texas A&M	W 72–68	69.2	Away	8–13
02-02	Northwestern St.	W 61–58	63.3	Away	9–13
02-07	A&M-Corpus Christi	L 76–83	67.7	Home	9–14
02-09	UTRGV	L 72–92	69.0	Home	9–15
02-14	UIW	W 91–83	65.6	Away	10–15
02-16	Houston Christian	L 68–72	67.4	Away	10–16
02-21	SFA	L 78–81	66.4	Away	10–17
02-23	Lamar University	W 53–52	64.8	Away	11–17
02-28	Southeastern La.	W 68–60	65.4	Home	12–17
03-02	McNeese	L 65–75	67.3	Home	12–18
03-08	Northwestern St.	W 61–47	58.9	Neutral	13–18
03-09	UTRGV	L 68–86	66.9	Neutral	13–19

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Sincere Malone	32	32:04	80.2%	14.2	5.3	3.7	2.3	0.5	3.1	3.2	106–189	56.1%	17–55	30.9%	102–128	79.7%	53.9%	60.8%	52.5%	5	32:27 +0:23	81.1%	10.6 −0.8
Trae English	29	31:06	70.5%	15.0	2.7	4.3	2.3	0.1	2.3	2.8	81–180	45.0%	35–121	28.9%	71–88	80.7%	44.4%	49.7%	29.2%	5	33:48 +2:42	84.5%	15.4 +3.7
Jalik Dunkley	29	28:58	65.6%	17.1	9.2	1.4	1.3	0.9	2.2	2.7	122–204	59.8%	13–37	35.1%†	76–148	51.4%	58.7%	58.6%	61.4%	5	27:21 −1:37	68.4%	7.0 −5.4
Jaylen Searles	31	25:48	62.5%	18.2	5.9	3.0	1.5	0.9	2.5	3.8	63–137	46.0%	60–167	35.9%	58–86	67.4%	50.3%	53.2%	28.3%	5	14:28 −11:20	36.2%	5.2 −6.5
Christian Winborne	29	22:36	51.2%	13.9	2.9	1.8	2.3	0.0	1.3	3.6	22–53	41.5%	54–155	34.8%	22–34	64.7%	49.5%	51.1%	16.3%	4	18:50 −3:46	37.7%	6.5 −1.4
Zee Hamoda	28	20:53	45.7%	17.2	5.3	2.1	1.1	1.2	2.1	3.9	37–76	48.7%	53–142	37.3%	19–25	76.0%	53.4%	55.0%	11.5%	5	23:36 +2:43	59.0%	7.2 −1.8
Jalin Rice	30	16:49	39.4%	11.5	5.8	2.3	1.4	0.2	2.9	5.1	44–91	48.4%	6–30	20.0%†	39–63	61.9%	43.8%	48.7%	52.1%	5	24:00 +7:11	60.0%	7.4 +2.6
Grant Sanders	31	16:11	39.2%	7.9	7.9	2.3	1.9	1.0	2.4	4.5	38–63	60.3%†	2–8	25.0%†	17–37	45.9%	57.7%†	56.7%†	52.1%†	5	23:28 +7:17	58.7%	5.0 +1.8
Nick Krass	28	11:04	24.2%	5.9	4.6	1.3	0.6	0.1	1.2	5.7	8–14	57.1%†	7–22	31.8%†	9–12	75.0%†	51.4%†	55.7%†	33.3%†	5	5:11 −5:53	13.0%	0.0 −1.6
Zaiden Cross	15	11:18	13.2%	12.0	4.7	0.9	1.9	0.9	1.4	1.2	5–17	29.4%†	12–46	26.1%†	5–10	50.0%†	36.5%†	37.8%†	15.9%†	1	0:16 −11:02	0.1%	0.0 −3.4
Kevin PazminoUnder 100 minutes	16	4:33	5.7%	13.2	0.5	0.0	0.5	0.0	0.5	4.4	0–1	0.0%†	8–20	40.0%†	0–0	—	57.1%†	57.1%†	0.0%†	1	0:16 −4:17	0.1%	0.0 −1.5
Domanic BetancourtFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	2:42	1.1%	0.0	8.9	0.0	3.0	3.0	0.0	5.9	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Jordan MatthewsFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	0:49	0.2%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	16.2	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	32 games			71.0	30.3	12.9	not published	2.8	11.9	not published	526–1027	51.2%	267–803	33.3%	418–631	66.2%	50.6%	53.9%	34.5%
Sum of players				71.0	27.1	12.9	8.7	2.8	11.3	18.0	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.3	+0.0	not published	0.0	+0.6	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $165K; 80% Range $63K to $455K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $165K in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Sincere Malone	82.5%	$51K	$17K to $175K	27.5%	$50K to $51K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Trae English	71.2%	$14K	$2K to $47K	11.5%	$14K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jalik Dunkley	67.4%	$16K	$2K to $53K	11.6%	$15K to $16K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaylen Searles	64.6%	$17K	$3K to $54K	12.0%	$16K to $17K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Christian Winborne	49.6%	$11K	$1K to $35K	8.3%	$10K to $11K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Zee Hamoda	41.4%	$12K	$3K to $42K	8.3%	$12K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jalin Rice	39.9%	$4K	$1K to $18K	2.9%	$4K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Grant Sanders	38.8%	$12K	$3K to $41K	7.8%	$11K to $12K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Nick Krass	23.1%	$2K	$1K to $9K	1.1%	$2K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Zaiden Cross	14.6%	$4K	$1K to $12K	2.7%	$4K in all four	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kevin Pazmino	5.7%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.8%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Domanic Betancourt	1.0%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.8%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jordan Matthews	0.3%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.8%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$165K	$63K to $455K	100%	$165K in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Nicholls State University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,226,806
Men's basketball expenses	$1,186,820
Athletics department expenses	$12,676,933
Athletics department revenue	$12,687,500

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 32 games, 2,187 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1280 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	71.0	75.7
Field goals made	24.8	26.1
Field goals attempted	57.2	54.7
3-pointers made	8.3	7.3
3-pointers attempted	25.1	21.2
Free throws made	13.1	16.2
Free throws attempted	19.7	20.8
Offensive rebounds	10.0	10.3
Defensive rebounds	20.3	25.7
Total rebounds	30.3	36.0
Assists	12.9	14.6
Blocks	2.8	3.2
Turnovers	11.9	14.0
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 277.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 575.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,271	2,271	0	±11.4	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	793	793	0	±4.0	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,830	1,830	0	±9.2	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	267	267	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	803	803	0	±4.0	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	418	418	0	±2.1	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	631	631	0	±3.2	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	971	866	+105	±77.7	0
Assists	Reconciled	414	413	+1	±2.1	0
Blocks	Reconciled	88	88	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	381	361	+20	±11.4	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	277	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	575	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,400	6,382	+17.7	±128.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Sincere Malone	82.5%	+2.0range +0.5 to +3.4Sufficient evidence
Trae English	71.2%	-0.4range -1.3 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Jalik Dunkley	67.4%	-0.2range -1.5 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Jaylen Searles	64.6%	+0.1range -1.2 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Christian Winborne	49.6%	-0.4range -1.5 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Zee Hamoda	41.4%	+0.2range -0.6 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Jalin Rice	39.9%	-2.1range -3.5 to -0.8Sufficient evidence
Grant Sanders	38.8%	+0.1range -0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Nick Krass	23.1%	-3.0range -4.1 to -2.0Sufficient evidence
Zaiden Cross	14.6%	-0.5range -1.3 to +0.2Limited evidence
Kevin Pazmino	5.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Domanic Betancourt	1.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jordan Matthews	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.3range +8.4 to +10.2Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.6% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.4%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.9%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value