East Texas A&M

Slnd · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 331 · Raw net -13.1 · Tempo 68.5 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-02

Record: 9–21; 9 wins
AdjNet: -10.8β; rank 311 of 365
AdjO: 100.2β; rank 330 of 365
AdjD: 111.0β; rank 247 of 365
AdjT: 69.2β
SOS: 0.1β; rank 155 of 363
NCSOS: 6.4β
WAB: -13.8β; rank 298 of 363
RR: 0.6β
Exp. W: 8.4β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	97.9342	111.0245	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	49.2282	52.9261	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	19.2330	17.0152	16.7
Offensive rebound %	25.7328	32.8290	30.6
FTA / FGA %	32.0256	34.5162	35.0
Shooting
3P%	31.3312	37.3347	33.9
2P%	51.2202	51.0142	51.7
FT%	67.9327	69.639	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	46.2	38.0	39.5
Assists / FGM %	62.4	56.0	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.6	10.8	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	36.1	32.7	31.4
2-pointers %	45.8	48.8	48.8
Free throws %	18.1	18.5	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.0
Top Three Share of Minutes: 44%
Bench Share of Minutes: 34%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-05	New Mexico	L 54–76	77.1	Away	0–1
11-10	Hawaii	L 74–100	77.4	—	0–2
11-14	Rice	L 64–71	66.2	Away	0–3
11-24	FDU	W 70–65	66.9	Away	1–3
11-25	Army West Point	W 84–67	69.0	Neutral	2–3
12-05	UConn	L 59–83	65.7	Away	2–4
12-07	Central Ark.	W 75–68	74.5	Home	3–4
12-12	McNeese	L 66–102	79.0	Away	3–5
12-15	Southeastern La.	W 70–69	64.6	Away	4–5
12-21	Texas A&M	L 77–118	83.7	Away	4–6
12-29	SFA	L 48–75	64.9	Home	4–7
12-31	Lamar University	L 62–69	66.3	Home	4–8
01-03	Nicholls	L 58–80	73.8	Away	4–9
01-05	LSU New Orleans	L 73–83	70.9	Away	4–10
01-10	UTRGV	W 77–69	65.7	Home	5–10
01-12	A&M-Corpus Christi	L 50–61	66.9	Home	5–11
01-17	Houston Christian	L 70–81	68.4	Away	5–12
01-19	UIW	W 80–58	60.3	Away	6–12
01-27	Lamar University	L 61–82	67.9	Away	6–13
01-31	Nicholls	L 68–72	69.2	Home	6–14
02-02	LSU New Orleans	L 85–94	78.3	Home	6–15
02-04	Northwestern St.	W 74–68	63.2	Away	7–15
02-07	Northwestern St.	W 52–48	66.5	Home	8–15
02-09	SFA	L 70–74	66.8	Away	8–16
02-14	McNeese	L 54–97	68.1	Home	8–17
02-16	Southeastern La.	W 70–53	67.7	Home	9–17
02-21	UIW	L 73–82	57.2	Home	9–18
02-23	Houston Christian	L 68–69	64.1	Home	9–19
02-28	UTRGV	L 55–63	57.6	Away	9–20
03-02	A&M-Corpus Christi	L 71–84	67.2	Away	9–21

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Gianni Hunt	30	31:53	79.7%	342	129	143	47	4	76	64	64–139	46.0%	40–126	31.7%	94–123	76.4%	46.8%	53.6%	46.4%	5	35:06 +3:12	87.7%	13.2 +1.8
Ronnie Harrison	28	30:27	71.1%	397	174	50	33	20	65	51	118–222	53.2%	29–102	28.4%	74–113	65.5%	49.8%	53.1%	34.9%	5	30:45 +0:18	76.9%	12.4 −1.8
Noah Pagotto	30	26:48	67.0%	316	169	30	26	18	31	92	101–167	60.5%	18–47	38.3%†	60–78	76.9%	59.8%	63.6%	36.4%	5	34:32 +7:44	86.3%	15.8 +5.3
Damian Garcia	30	26:15	65.6%	303	95	60	31	14	48	52	61–125	48.8%	46–148	31.1%	43–75	57.3%	47.6%	49.5%	27.5%	5	28:14 +1:59	70.6%	8.6 −1.5
Vinny Sigona	26	19:56	43.2%	194	26	43	9	1	31	46	8–21	38.1%	53–141	37.6%	19–22	86.4%†	54.0%	56.5%	13.6%	5	18:01 −1:55	45.0%	7.6 +0.1
Josh Taylor	30	16:31	41.3%	147	100	22	10	19	33	45	52–96	54.2%	8–24	33.3%†	19–34	55.9%	53.3%	54.5%	28.3%	5	18:04 +1:33	45.2%	3.8 −1.1
Tay Mosher	25	16:45	34.9%	113	51	25	10	2	12	45	13–23	56.5%	27–87	31.0%	6–10	60.0%†	48.6%	49.4%	9.1%	5	21:41 +4:55	54.2%	5.4 +0.9
Evan Phelps	29	13:59	33.8%	36	19	28	21	5	29	40	7–28	25.0%†	6–33	18.2%†	4–15	26.7%†	26.2%†	26.6%†	24.6%†	5	10:05 −3:54	25.2%	0.6 −0.6
London Fields	23	14:05	27.0%	63	31	15	8	3	14	26	7–16	43.8%†	13–51	25.5%	10–14	71.4%†	39.6%†	43.1%†	20.9%†	2	3:59 −10:06	4.0%	0.0 −2.7
Michael Folarin	19	12:27	19.7%	74	63	8	2	7	17	30	24–52	46.2%†	0–2	0.0%†	26–41	63.4%	44.4%†	51.4%†	75.9%†	—	—	—	—
Alex McCray	19	8:51	14.0%	27	17	15	5	1	20	13	6–10	60.0%†	2–12	16.7%†	9–11	81.8%†	40.9%†	50.3%†	50.0%†	2	2:42 −6:09	2.7%	0.0 −1.4
Parker WhisenhuntFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	2:14	0.7%	0	1	0	0	0	1	3	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:31 −1:43	0.3%	0.0 0.0
Mykol Sanchez-VegaFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	1:12	0.1%	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	30 games			2012	962	439	not published	94	395	not published	461–900	51.2%	242–774	31.3%	364–536	67.9%	49.2%	52.7%	32.0%
Sum of players				2012	875	439	202	94	377	507	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+87	0	not published	0	+18	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $200K; 80% Range $75K to $540K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $195K to $205K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 2 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Gianni Hunt	78.4%	$59K	$18K to $195K	26.5%	$58K to $59K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ronnie Harrison	66.6%	$6K	$1K to $38K	5.2%	$6K to $7K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Noah Pagotto	65.4%	$34K	$9K to $130K	16.7%	$34K to $35K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Damian Garcia	63.2%	$14K	$1K to $56K	10.4%	$14K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Vinny Sigona	44.8%	$8K	$1K to $36K	5.7%	$7K to $8K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Josh Taylor	43.3%	$6K	$1K to $28K	4.2%	$5K to $6K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Evan Phelps	37.1%	$4K	$1K to $19K	1.1%	$4K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tay Mosher	29.7%	$17K	$4K to $66K	8.1%	$17K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
London Fields	28.9%	$3K	$1K to $15K	1.1%	$3K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Michael Folarin	24.6%	$5K	$1K to $21K	3.9%	$5K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Alex McCray	17.1%	$3K	$1K to $10K	1.1%	$3K in all four	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Parker Whisenhunt	0.9%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.8%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Mykol Sanchez-Vega	0.1%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.8%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$200K	$75K to $540K	100%	$195K to $205K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, East Texas A&M University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,757,485
Men's basketball expenses	$1,756,914
Athletics department expenses	$18,247,569
Athletics department revenue	$21,855,372

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 30 games, 2,055 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,012	2,281
Field goals made	703	805
Field goals attempted	1,674	1,758
3-pointers made	242	249
3-pointers attempted	774	668
Free throws made	364	422
Free throws attempted	536	606
Offensive rebounds	271	337
Defensive rebounds	691	782
Total rebounds	962	1,119
Assists	439	451
Blocks	94	97
Turnovers	395	349
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 202.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 507.
Minutes (derived)	6,000	not published

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,012	2,012	0	±10.1	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	703	703	0	±3.5	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,674	1,674	0	±8.4	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	242	242	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	774	774	0	±3.9	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	364	364	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	536	536	0	±2.7	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	962	875	+87	±77.0	0
Assists	Reconciled	439	439	0	±2.2	0
Blocks	Reconciled	94	94	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	395	377	+18	±11.8	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	202	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	507	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,000	5,978	+22.1	±120.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Gianni Hunt	78.4%	+1.2range -0.1 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Ronnie Harrison	66.6%	-2.3range -3.4 to -0.9Sufficient evidence
Noah Pagotto	65.4%	+0.5range -0.7 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Damian Garcia	63.2%	-1.0range -2.2 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Vinny Sigona	44.8%	-1.6range -2.9 to -0.1Sufficient evidence
Josh Taylor	43.3%	-1.8range -2.6 to -1.0Sufficient evidence
Evan Phelps	37.1%	-3.0range -4.1 to -2.0Sufficient evidence
Tay Mosher	29.7%	+0.6range -0.8 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
London Fields	28.9%	-3.1range -4.2 to -2.0Sufficient evidence
Michael Folarin	24.6%	-1.3range -2.1 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Alex McCray	17.1%	-3.7range -4.7 to -2.6Limited evidence
Parker Whisenhunt	0.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Mykol Sanchez-Vega	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +8.4range +7.5 to +9.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.8% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 3.4%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value