Presbyterian

BSth · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 245 · Raw net -4.6 · Tempo 66.1 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

Record: 12–18; 12 wins
AdjNet: -6.2β; rank 255 of 365
AdjO: 103.8β; rank 276 of 365
AdjD: 110.0β; rank 221 of 365
AdjT: 65.7β
SOS: -2.5β; rank 249 of 363
NCSOS: -0.5β
WAB: -12.1β; rank 261 of 363
RR: -0.6β
Exp. W: 12.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	104.6257	109.2200	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	51.0195	51.2169	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	19.3332	15.7232	16.7
Offensive rebound %	33.186	30.6188	30.6
FTA / FGA %	39.370	37.1241	35.0
Shooting
3P%	31.6302	34.7234	33.9
2P%	52.3153	50.6123	51.7
FT%	68.5312	69.225	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	28.0	36.3	39.5
Assists / FGM %	49.1	47.9	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	12.5	8.5	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	20.6	29.6	31.4
2-pointers %	58.5	50.4	48.8
Free throws %	20.9	20.1	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 7.6
Top Three Share of Minutes: 49%
Bench Share of Minutes: 22%
Players with Logged Minutes: 12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Navy	L 55–76	64.4	Home	0–1
11-08	ETSU	W 68–64	64.7	Home	1–1
11-10	Georgia St.	W 63–61	59.8	Away	2–1
11-12	South Carolina	L 61–81	64.8	Away	2–2
11-16	Sacramento St.	L 62–64	66.4	Away	2–3
11-18	California	L 57–67	57.7	Away	2–4
11-21	UCLA	L 46–86	67.3	Away	2–5
11-30	The Citadel	W 69–41	54.2	Neutral	3–5
12-03	Wofford	L 56–63	63.1	Away	3–6
12-06	Morehead St.	W 80–72	67.7	Home	4–6
12-17	East Carolina	L 53–74	68.5	Away	4–7
12-21	Manhattan	L 81–87	70.9	Away	4–8
01-03	USC Upstate	W 86–77	69.9	Home	5–8
01-07	Radford	L 61–80	61.6	Away	5–9
01-10	Longwood	L 70–77	63.1	Away	5–10
01-14	UNC Asheville	W 71–70	65.6	Home	6–10
01-17	Gardner-Webb	W 92–55	70.0	Away	7–10
01-21	Charleston So.	W 87–83	73.4	Home	8–10
01-24	Winthrop	L 72–82	71.3	Home	8–11
01-29	High Point	L 81–84	68.8	Away	8–12
01-31	Radford	L 84–93 2OT	82.4	Home	8–13
02-07	Gardner-Webb	W 68–62	63.3	Home	9–13
02-12	Charleston So.	L 67–84	67.5	Away	9–14
02-14	UNC Asheville	W 58–57	63.0	Away	10–14
02-19	Longwood	W 72–65	66.5	Home	11–14
02-21	USC Upstate	L 74–76	64.4	Away	11–15
02-26	High Point	L 73–79	68.3	Home	11–16
02-28	Winthrop	L 70–74	70.3	Away	11–17
03-06	Radford	W 91–85 1OT	79.8	Neutral	12–17
03-07	Winthrop	L 71–73	68.6	Neutral	12–18

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Carl Parrish	30	34:37	85.5%	16.9	3.4	2.7	0.8	0.1	1.9	2.3	78–185	42.2%	69–169	40.8%	77–91	84.6%	51.3%	55.8%	25.7%	5	38:18 +3:41	93.4%	17.0 +2.3
Jonah Pierce	30	33:22	82.4%	18.8	11.8	1.6	1.0	1.6	3.4	3.0	188–354	53.1%	0–1	0.0%†	94–163	57.7%	53.0%	55.1%	45.9%	5	34:32 +1:10	84.2%	13.6 −2.1
Triston Wilson	30	31:45	78.4%	14.6	4.2	4.8	1.4	0.1	3.1	3.8	91–175	52.0%	20–85	23.5%	106–131	80.9%	46.5%	54.8%	50.4%	5	36:36 +4:51	89.3%	14.4 +2.8
Jaylen Peterson	30	30:21	74.9%	14.5	9.5	1.1	1.2	1.9	2.1	3.5	134–225	59.6%	1–1	100.0%†	58–103	56.3%	60.0%	60.6%	45.6%	5	33:25 +3:04	81.5%	13.2 +2.2
Josh Pickett	30	27:26	67.7%	8.3	2.2	3.2	0.5	0.1	2.2	3.4	15–44	34.1%	37–108	34.3%	29–39	74.4%	46.4%	50.2%	25.7%	5	30:58 +3:32	75.5%	7.4 +1.7
Iverson King	18	18:45	27.8%	7.8	5.7	1.3	1.3	0.4	2.3	4.6	17–39	43.6%†	8–39	20.5%†	8–12	66.7%†	37.2%†	39.6%†	15.4%†	2	5:53 −12:51	5.7%	2.5 −1.2
Chidi Chiakwelu	30	10:32	26.0%	12.5	8.4	0.4	0.9	4.6	1.5	6.5	41–60	68.3%†	0–0	—	17–44	38.6%	68.3%†	62.4%†	73.3%†	5	13:16 +2:44	32.4%	6.0 +2.7
Khalon Hudson	29	10:45	25.7%	12.2	7.7	0.8	1.8	0.3	1.4	4.1	32–51	62.7%†	3–19	15.8%†	22–25	88.0%	52.1%†	58.6%†	35.7%†	5	3:43 −7:02	9.1%	0.4 −2.9
JD Bowden	25	7:38	15.7%	7.5	1.5	4.4	1.9	0.2	3.1	4.2	6–22	27.3%†	3–16	18.8%†	15–16	93.8%†	27.6%†	40.0%†	42.1%†	5	9:42 +2:04	23.7%	2.0 +0.6
Erik TaylorFew games	5	21:32	8.9%	10.4	3.3	6.7	0.7	0.0	1.5	1.5	6–9	66.7%†	2–13	15.4%†	10–13	76.9%†	40.9%†	50.5%†	59.1%†	—	—	—	—
Amare AndersonUnder 100 minutes	19	3:22	5.3%	11.3	2.5	0.6	1.3	0.6	2.5	6.3	6–9	66.7%†	1–4	25.0%†	3–4	75.0%†	57.7%†	61.0%†	30.8%†	3	3:26 +0:04	5.0%	1.3 +0.4
Luke AllisonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	1:20	0.5%	0.0	6.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	6.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:07 −1:13	0.1%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	30 games			69.1	34.1	12.2	not published	4.5	12.8	not published	614–1173	52.3%	144–456	31.6%	439–641	68.5%	51.0%	54.9%	39.3%
Sum of players				69.1	30.9	12.2	5.4	4.5	12.1	17.5	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.2	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.7	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

No EADA match for this school.

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 30 games, 2,007 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1215 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	69.1	72.2
Field goals made	25.0	25.3
Field goals attempted	53.6	56.4
3-pointers made	4.7	7.1
3-pointers attempted	15.0	20.5
Free throws made	14.5	14.5
Free throws attempted	21.1	20.9
Offensive rebounds	10.6	10.4
Defensive rebounds	23.5	21.4
Total rebounds	34.1	31.8
Assists	12.2	12.1
Blocks	4.5	3.3
Turnovers	12.8	10.4
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 164.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 531.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,099	2,099	0	±10.5	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	758	758	0	±3.8	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,629	1,629	0	±8.1	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	144	144	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	456	456	0	±2.3	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	439	439	0	±2.2	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	641	641	0	±3.2	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,036	939	+97	±82.9	0
Assists	Reconciled	372	372	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	136	136	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	388	367	+21	±11.6	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	164	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	531	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,075	6,060	+15.3	±121.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Carl Parrish	86.0%	+0.5range -0.9 to +1.7Sufficient evidence
Jonah Pierce	83.1%	+0.6range -0.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Triston Wilson	79.2%	+1.9range +1.0 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Jaylen Peterson	75.5%	-0.9range -2.0 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Josh Pickett	68.0%	-2.4range -3.7 to -0.8Sufficient evidence
Iverson King	26.7%	-3.2range -4.6 to -1.8Sufficient evidence
Khalon Hudson	26.0%	+0.3range -0.8 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Chidi Chiakwelu	25.6%	+0.4range -0.5 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
JD Bowden	15.5%	-0.6range -1.3 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Erik Taylor	8.6%	+0.5range -0.5 to +1.3Limited evidence
Amare Anderson	5.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Luke Allison	0.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.3range +8.3 to +10.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.8% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.7%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value