Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Presbyterian

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Presbyterian, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Carl Parrish86.0%+0.5range -0.9 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+5.2range +4.5 to +5.8Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Jonah Pierce83.1%+0.6range -0.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+5.1range +4.5 to +5.7Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Triston Wilson79.2%+1.9range +1.0 to +2.8Sufficient evidence+5.4range +4.9 to +5.9Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Jaylen Peterson75.5%-0.9range -2.0 to +0.1Sufficient evidence+4.1range +3.5 to +4.6Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Josh Pickett68.0%-2.4range -3.7 to -0.8Sufficient evidence+3.1range +2.5 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Iverson King26.7%-3.2range -4.6 to -1.8Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.8 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Khalon Hudson26.0%+0.3range -0.8 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.4 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Chidi Chiakwelu25.6%+0.4range -0.5 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.4 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
JD Bowden15.5%-0.6range -1.3 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.8 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Erik Taylor8.6%+0.5range -0.5 to +1.3Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidenceLoadingLoading
Amare Anderson5.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableLoadingLoading
Luke Allison0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableLoadingLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Loading Speculative compensation

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

Loading School finances

Coverage and exclusions

30 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (100%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

No exclusions were recorded.

Program revenueβ

No program revenue was published for this team.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days7
3 or more days21

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent3
Longest run of consecutive away games5

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology