Southeastern La.

Slnd · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 308 · Raw net -9.8 · Tempo 65.6 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-02

Record: 8–22; 8 wins
AdjNet: -9.1β; rank 292 of 365
AdjO: 100.1β; rank 331 of 365
AdjD: 109.2β; rank 206 of 365
AdjT: 66.6β
SOS: -0.9β; rank 192 of 363
NCSOS: 3.2β
WAB: -15.5β; rank 321 of 363
RR: -1.7β
Exp. W: 9.7β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	98.4339	108.2172	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	46.7344	52.4233	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	18.4290	19.146	16.7
Offensive rebound %	28.6244	31.4225	30.6
FTA / FGA %	40.357	41.2314	35.0
Shooting
3P%	28.4362	36.0300	33.9
2P%	49.4272	51.4157	51.7
FT%	68.4318	73.4242	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	39.5	37.9	39.5
Assists / FGM %	51.6	53.0	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.3	9.7	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	27.8	30.3	31.4
2-pointers %	49.5	47.3	48.8
Free throws %	22.8	22.4	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 10.0
Top Three Share of Minutes: 40%
Bench Share of Minutes: 41%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Ole Miss	L 58–88	66.6	Away	0–1
11-07	Louisiana	L 52–58	58.2	Away	0–2
11-10	Georgia Tech	L 60–70	76.2	Away	0–3
11-15	Mississippi St.	L 68–75	73.7	Away	0–4
11-26	UNCW	L 57–70	62.5	Away	0–5
11-28	Gardner-Webb	W 76–68	71.5	Neutral	1–5
11-29	Navy	W 69–65	64.7	Neutral	2–5
12-07	Northwestern St.	L 68–76	66.0	Home	2–6
12-13	Houston Christian	W 74–71 1OT	70.2	Away	3–6
12-15	East Texas A&M	L 69–70	64.6	Home	3–7
12-19	LSU	L 65–78	61.5	Away	3–8
12-30	UIW	L 70–79	72.5	Away	3–9
01-03	SFA	L 63–73	66.6	Home	3–10
01-05	Lamar University	W 60–52	59.4	Home	4–10
01-10	McNeese	L 61–73	62.7	Away	4–11
01-12	LSU New Orleans	L 76–79	69.5	Home	4–12
01-17	A&M-Corpus Christi	L 56–68	70.3	Away	4–13
01-19	UTRGV	L 65–68	65.7	Away	4–14
01-24	Nicholls	W 67–61	70.6	Home	5–14
01-27	McNeese	L 66–76	66.4	Home	5–15
01-31	SFA	L 58–85	60.7	Away	5–16
02-02	Lamar University	L 54–73	60.7	Away	5–17
02-07	Houston Christian	W 55–47	56.5	Home	6–17
02-09	UIW	W 74–62	61.1	Home	7–17
02-14	Northwestern St.	L 66–69	62.5	Away	7–18
02-16	East Texas A&M	L 53–70	67.7	Away	7–19
02-21	UTRGV	L 75–96	63.8	Home	7–20
02-23	A&M-Corpus Christi	L 68–73	64.7	Home	7–21
02-28	Nicholls	L 60–68	65.4	Away	7–22
03-02	LSU New Orleans	W 82–78	74.4	Away	8–22

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Jeremy Elyzee	30	29:50	74.3%	333	135	51	33	22	56	73	115–222	51.8%	11–52	21.2%	70–99	70.7%	48.0%	52.4%	36.1%	5	29:31 −0:18	73.8%	13.6 +2.5
Isaiah Gaines	30	28:23	70.7%	320	186	48	25	32	57	83	113–198	57.1%	1–11	9.1%†	91–144	63.2%	54.8%	58.7%	68.9%	5	22:59 −5:24	57.4%	10.2 −0.5
Makhi Myles	30	20:59	52.2%	231	104	16	41	16	27	60	39–81	48.1%	34–101	33.7%	51–62	82.3%	49.5%	55.2%	34.1%	5	26:00 +5:01	65.0%	5.0 −2.7
Jaiden Lawrence	30	20:04	50.0%	153	69	16	20	0	14	61	18–37	48.6%	31–102	30.4%	24–36	66.7%	46.4%	49.4%	25.9%	5	18:48 −1:16	47.0%	4.8 −0.3
C.J. Booker	29	20:05	48.3%	135	35	57	17	1	24	32	28–81	34.6%	22–55	40.0%	13–18	72.2%†	44.9%	46.9%	13.2%	5	27:13 +7:08	68.0%	9.0 +4.3
Ethan Pickett	30	18:27	45.9%	157	72	40	11	1	33	61	53–108	49.1%	4–25	16.0%†	39–57	68.4%	44.4%	49.7%	42.9%	5	15:26 −3:02	38.6%	7.2 +2.0
Peter Hemschemeier	27	20:14	45.3%	172	44	51	14	1	44	31	27–68	39.7%	33–120	27.5%	19–26	73.1%	40.7%	43.1%	13.8%	5	15:02 −5:12	37.6%	4.2 −2.2
Jalen Forrest	27	17:11	38.5%	213	68	13	13	2	26	35	37–79	46.8%	18–65	27.7%	85–109	78.0%	44.4%	55.5%	75.7%	2	19:58 +2:47	20.0%	7.5 −0.4
Kyle Edison	24	9:49	19.5%	81	37	22	13	1	19	41	15–26	57.7%†	9–38	23.7%†	24–37	64.9%	44.5%†	50.4%†	57.8%†	2	3:04 −6:45	3.1%	1.0 −2.4
Ubong Abasi Etim	30	7:22	18.3%	28	41	5	2	4	7	17	13–25	52.0%†	0–0	—	2–11	18.2%†	52.0%†	46.9%†	44.0%†	5	6:43 −0:39	16.8%	0.4 −0.5
Garrett Shoemaker	23	6:46	12.9%	43	33	2	5	0	8	24	9–16	56.3%†	5–15	33.3%†	10–27	37.0%	53.2%†	50.1%†	87.1%†	5	14:35 +7:49	36.4%	4.2 +2.3
Ahmed Essahaty	15	10:02	12.5%	35	21	13	1	0	13	13	8–17	47.1%†	4–16	25.0%†	7–12	58.3%†	42.4%†	45.7%†	36.4%†	5	13:59 +3:57	35.0%	5.6 +3.3
Seth JonesFew games	7	16:53	9.8%	44	20	7	9	2	15	10	6–15	40.0%†	8–34	23.5%†	8–10	80.0%†	36.7%†	41.2%†	20.4%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	30 games			1945	947	341	not published	82	364	not published	481–973	49.4%	180–634	28.4%	443–648	68.4%	46.7%	51.4%	40.3%
Sum of players				1945	865	341	204	82	343	541	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+82	0	not published	0	+21	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $200K; 80% Range $74K to $560K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $170K to $215K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Jeremy Elyzee	74.3%	$49K	$15K to $165K	21.7%	$42K to $53K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Gaines	70.0%	$40K	$11K to $135K	18.0%	$34K to $43K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Makhi Myles	51.6%	$19K	$3K to $63K	10.6%	$16K to $20K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaiden Lawrence	50.4%	$5K	$1K to $28K	3.3%	$4K to $5K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
C.J. Booker	49.1%	$10K	$1K to $40K	7.2%	$8K to $11K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ethan Pickett	46.2%	$11K	$1K to $39K	7.7%	$9K to $11K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Peter Hemschemeier	42.8%	$10K	$1K to $39K	7.0%	$8K to $10K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jalen Forrest	38.4%	$4K	$1K to $23K	3.0%	$4K to $5K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kyle Edison	20.0%	$6K	$1K to $24K	4.0%	$5K to $7K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ubong Abasi Etim	19.1%	$5K	$1K to $20K	3.4%	$4K to $5K	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Garrett Shoemaker	12.9%	$4K	$1K to $14K	2.6%	$3K to $4K	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ahmed Essahaty	12.8%	$3K	$1K to $10K	1.2%	$2K to $3K	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Seth Jones	12.4%	$3K	$1K to $12K	2.2%	$3K to $4K	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$200K	$74K to $560K	100%	$170K to $215K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Southeastern Louisiana University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,181,300	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$1,181,300
Athletics department expenses	$19,286,332
Athletics department revenue	$19,286,332

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 30 games, 1,977 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	1,945	2,139
Field goals made	661	722
Field goals attempted	1,607	1,585
3-pointers made	180	216
3-pointers attempted	634	600
Free throws made	443	479
Free throws attempted	648	653
Offensive rebounds	301	296
Defensive rebounds	646	750
Total rebounds	947	1,046
Assists	341	383
Blocks	82	94
Turnovers	364	377
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 204.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 541.
Minutes (derived)	6,025	not published

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	1,945	1,945	0	±9.7	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	661	661	0	±3.3	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,607	1,607	0	±8.0	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	180	180	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	634	634	0	±3.2	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	443	443	0	±2.2	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	648	648	0	±3.2	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	947	865	+82	±75.8	0
Assists	Reconciled	341	341	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	82	82	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	364	343	+21	±10.9	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	204	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	541	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,025	6,004	+20.8	±120.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Jeremy Elyzee	74.3%	+1.0range -0.1 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Gaines	70.0%	+0.7range -0.5 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Makhi Myles	51.6%	-0.1range -1.0 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Jaiden Lawrence	50.4%	-2.1range -3.2 to -1.2Sufficient evidence
C.J. Booker	49.1%	-1.1range -2.1 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Ethan Pickett	46.2%	-0.7range -1.7 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Peter Hemschemeier	42.8%	-0.8range -2.1 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Jalen Forrest	38.4%	-2.3range -3.6 to -0.9Sufficient evidence
Kyle Edison	20.0%	-0.7range -1.5 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Ubong Abasi Etim	19.1%	-1.1range -2.1 to +0.2Limited evidence
Garrett Shoemaker	12.9%	-0.9range -1.7 to -0.0Limited evidence
Ahmed Essahaty	12.8%	-2.1range -2.9 to -1.5Limited evidence
Seth Jones	12.4%	-1.2range -2.0 to -0.4Limited evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +8.9range +8.1 to +9.6Limited evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

13 valued players hold 100.0% of on-court time. 0 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 11.4%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value