Lehigh

Pat · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 235 · Raw net -3.7 · Tempo 66.5 · 33 Division I games · Through 2026-03-18

Record: 16–17; 16 wins
AdjNet: -8.0β; rank 282 of 365
AdjO: 102.6β; rank 298 of 365
AdjD: 110.7β; rank 235 of 365
AdjT: 67.6β
SOS: -5.4β; rank 329 of 363
NCSOS: 1.2β
WAB: -11.7β; rank 255 of 363
RR: 0.8β
Exp. W: 15.2β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	104.6258	108.3175	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.9107	50.6133	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.7253	16.2213	16.7
Offensive rebound %	23.2349	31.4226	30.6
FTA / FGA %	31.8258	32.5115	35.0
Shooting
3P%	36.157	32.9109	33.9
2P%	52.2163	51.2152	51.7
FT%	72.6182	75.3324	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	38.3	31.8	39.5
Assists / FGM %	54.3	44.5	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	7.6	8.3	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	32.1	24.9	31.4
2-pointers %	49.9	55.6	48.8
Free throws %	17.9	19.5	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.3
Top Three Share of Minutes: 50%
Bench Share of Minutes: 31%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Houston	L 57–75	68.2	Away	0–1
11-09	West Virginia	L 47–69	64.5	Away	0–2
11-14	Rutgers	L 72–84	70.2	Away	0–3
11-18	Saint Francis	W 79–62	73.3	Home	1–3
11-21	Columbia	L 67–82	68.5	Home	1–4
11-25	Marist	L 55–78	67.8	Away	1–5
11-28	UC Santa Barbara	L 70–72	64.1	Neutral	1–6
11-29	Texas St.	W 78–74 1OT	70.3	Neutral	2–6
12-02	Binghamton	L 71–80 1OT	71.7	Away	2–7
12-06	LIU	L 82–87	73.2	Home	2–8
12-21	Monmouth	L 62–76	67.3	Away	2–9
12-31	Army West Point	L 78–85 1OT	77.3	Home	2–10
01-03	Bucknell	L 65–72	73.3	Away	2–11
01-07	Holy Cross	W 66–58	63.5	Home	3–11
01-10	Colgate	W 78–77	65.2	Away	4–11
01-14	Boston U.	W 93–91 1OT	77.1	Away	5–11
01-17	Navy	L 79–82 2OT	77.0	Home	5–12
01-19	Loyola Maryland	W 88–81	68.0	Home	6–12
01-24	Lafayette	W 64–59	65.6	Home	7–12
01-28	Army West Point	L 64–67	67.4	Away	7–13
01-31	Colgate	W 77–76 1OT	71.3	Home	8–13
02-04	Loyola Maryland	L 84–89 2OT	80.3	Away	8–14
02-07	Holy Cross	L 67–76	64.8	Away	8–15
02-11	American	W 90–82	74.2	Home	9–15
02-14	Lafayette	W 78–69	64.6	Away	10–15
02-18	Navy	L 49–72	64.5	Away	10–16
02-22	Boston U.	W 70–67	58.8	Home	11–16
02-25	American	W 78–73	66.4	Away	12–16
02-28	Bucknell	W 89–79	67.9	Home	13–16
03-05	Holy Cross	W 69–66	66.6	Home	14–16
03-08	Colgate	W 76–69	68.5	Home	15–16
03-11	Boston U.	W 74–60	61.2	Home	16–16
03-18	Prairie View	L 55–67	65.2	—	16–17

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 33 of 33 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Nasir Whitlock	33	35:29	85.8%	23.0	3.8	3.8	1.2	0.0	3.1	2.2	149–314	47.5%	74–170	43.5%	153–194	78.9%	53.7%	59.1%	40.1%	5	36:05 +0:37	90.2%	21.2 +0.8
Joshua Ingram	33	35:19	85.4%	12.1	5.7	3.8	1.7	0.8	2.2	2.4	83–143	58.0%	47–119	39.5%	45–62	72.6%	58.6%	60.8%	23.7%	5	38:03 +2:44	95.1%	11.2 +0.5
Hank Alvey	33	31:28	76.1%	19.6	8.9	2.7	1.4	2.0	2.3	2.9	194–312	62.2%	5–12	41.7%†	106–163	65.0%	62.2%	64.3%	50.3%	5	34:34 +3:06	86.4%	20.6 +5.2
Jalen Vazquez	30	22:14	48.9%	7.1	4.6	3.5	2.0	0.1	2.2	2.9	31–69	44.9%	11–37	29.7%†	24–33	72.7%	44.8%	49.4%	31.1%	5	24:26 +2:12	61.1%	3.8 −0.2
Edouard Benoit	23	28:44	48.4%	14.2	8.4	1.5	0.8	0.3	2.5	3.6	47–102	46.1%	30–93	32.3%	50–61	82.0%	47.2%	52.7%	31.3%	5	28:55 +0:11	72.3%	8.8 −1.4
Peter Kramer	33	19:20	46.7%	7.7	3.6	1.2	1.1	0.5	0.9	3.6	9–21	42.9%	31–81	38.3%	12–18	66.7%†	54.4%	55.9%	17.6%	5	15:41 −3:40	39.2%	1.2 −2.5
Andrew Urosevic	27	18:02	35.7%	14.4	2.9	1.1	0.7	0.0	1.1	3.0	24–45	53.3%	40–125	32.0%	7–9	77.8%†	49.4%	50.3%	5.3%	5	16:23 −1:39	41.0%	5.0 −1.5
Caleb Thomas	21	20:49	32.0%	9.2	2.2	3.1	1.5	0.0	2.7	2.2	33–80	41.3%	6–29	20.7%†	17–30	56.7%	38.5%	41.3%	27.5%	2	0:14 −20:35	0.2%	0.0 −4.8
Alfredo Addesa	31	8:02	18.3%	9.5	7.1	1.8	1.3	0.8	3.4	6.4	14–33	42.4%†	8–30	26.7%†	7–10	70.0%†	41.3%†	43.8%†	15.9%†	5	4:55 −3:08	12.3%	0.8 −1.1
Jake Pike	16	9:13	10.8%	4.9	8.4	1.1	0.0	1.4	1.9	4.1	5–8	62.5%†	2–6	33.3%†	2–3	66.7%†	57.1%†	58.7%†	21.4%†	1	0:02 −9:11	0.0%	0.0 −1.1
Henri AdiassaUnder 100 minutes	23	3:58	6.7%	2.6	3.9	0.0	0.0	0.4	2.2	13.1	2–5	40.0%†	0–0	—	2–2	100.0%†	40.0%†	51.0%†	40.0%†	5	0:40 −3:18	1.7%	0.0 −0.3
Tommy ConniffUnder 100 minutes	14	3:37	3.7%	1.6	5.5	3.2	2.4	0.0	2.4	6.3	1–2	50.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	50.0%†	50.0%†	0.0%†	3	0:04 −3:33	0.1%	0.0 −0.1
Brendan ReedUnder 100 minutes	11	0:44	0.6%	0.0	10.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–1	0.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	3	0:04 −0:40	0.1%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	33 games			69.5	30.1	13.5	not published	3.0	11.8	not published	592–1135	52.2%	254–704	36.1%	425–585	72.6%	52.9%	56.5%	31.8%
Sum of players				69.5	27.3	13.5	6.4	3.0	11.3	15.4	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+2.7	0.0	not published	+0.0	+0.4	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Lehigh University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,252,333	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$2,252,333
Athletics department expenses	$45,257,553
Athletics department revenue	$45,257,553

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 33 games, 2,268 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1365 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	69.5	72.0
Field goals made	24.8	26.0
Field goals attempted	53.9	57.3
3-pointers made	7.4	6.0
3-pointers attempted	20.6	18.2
Free throws made	12.5	14.0
Free throws attempted	17.1	18.6
Offensive rebounds	7.3	10.4
Defensive rebounds	22.7	24.2
Total rebounds	30.1	34.7
Assists	13.5	11.6
Blocks	3.0	2.8
Turnovers	11.8	10.8
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 218.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 527.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

33 of 33 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,371	2,371	0	±11.9	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	846	846	0	±4.2	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,839	1,839	0	±9.2	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	254	254	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	704	704	0	±3.5	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	425	425	0	±2.1	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	585	585	0	±2.9	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,026	933	+93	±82.1	0
Assists	Reconciled	459	459	0	±2.3	0
Blocks	Reconciled	102	101	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	401	386	+15	±12.0	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	218	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	527	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,825	6,811	+13.8	±136.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Joshua Ingram	86.2%	+1.2range +0.6 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Nasir Whitlock	85.8%	-1.1range -2.1 to -0.2Sufficient evidence
Hank Alvey	77.1%	+2.1range +1.1 to +3.1Sufficient evidence
Edouard Benoit	52.1%	-0.6range -1.6 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Jalen Vazquez	49.0%	-1.1range -2.2 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Peter Kramer	46.4%	-0.2range -0.9 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Andrew Urosevic	37.8%	+0.8range -0.5 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Caleb Thomas	28.2%	-3.8range -5.0 to -2.4Sufficient evidence
Alfredo Addesa	17.4%	-2.8range -3.7 to -1.8Sufficient evidence
Jake Pike	8.8%	-0.5range -1.4 to +0.4Limited evidence
Henri Adiassa	6.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Tommy Conniff	4.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Brendan Reed	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.2range +8.3 to +9.9Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 97.8% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.8%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value