Isaac Finlinson
Hawaii · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
726:20 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 23:26
- Points per game
- 9.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.8 / 0.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.4 | 3.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.1 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 292 | 117 | 25 | 19 | 8 | 40 | 54 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 97–199 | 48.7% | 6.4 | 11.0 |
| 2P | 65–118 | 55.1% | 3.8 | 6.5 |
| 3P | 32–81 | 39.5% | 2.6 | 4.5 |
| FT | 66–101 | 65.3% | 3.3 | 5.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56.8% | 60.0% | 40.7% | 50.8% | 0.63 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Hawaii · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $26K
- 80% range $6K to $81K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.2%
- team pool $340K, 80% range $125K to $905K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $21K to $28K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $3K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 63.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Hawaii: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Hawaii | $26Kspeculative | $6K to $81K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.7 | -0.2 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +0.4 | +4.2range +3.7 to +4.7 | 1,466 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 30:26 | 23:26 | 10:51–35:30 | |
| Points | 11.2 | 9.4 | 1.0–19.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 53.5% | 55.7% | 0.0%–110.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | Arkansas | L 78–97 | 31:19 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 71.4% |
| 2026-03-14 | UC Irvine | W 71–64 | 22:26 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 2-6 | 20.0% |
| 2026-03-13 | Cal St. Fullerton | W 78–63 | 33:12 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-08 | Long Beach St. | L 75–84 | 33:43 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6-11 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 63.6% |
| 2026-03-06 | UC Riverside | W 93–74 | 31:31 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 7-9 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | Cal St. Fullerton | W 87–85 | 33:03 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | UC Davis | W 77–73 | 35:07 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 55.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | UC Santa Barbara | W 78–75 | 27:25 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-20 | Cal Poly | L 75–86 | 28:14 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-4 | 1-5 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | CSUN | L 60–84 | 24:06 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 4-7 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | CSU Bakersfield | W 89–74 | 26:40 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-08 | UC San Diego | W 72–67 | 34:09 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 4-5 | 45.8% |
| 2026-01-31 | Long Beach St. | W 89–82 | 34:09 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6-9 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 88.9% |
| 2026-01-29 | UC Irvine | L 76–87 | 35:30 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-10 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-25 | CSUN | W 89–68 | 30:39 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-23 | CSU Bakersfield | W 98–71 | 19:19 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | UC Santa Barbara | L 62–77 | 12:16 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Cal Poly | W 86–66 | 10:51 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-11 | UC Irvine | W 67–66 | 13:49 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | UC San Diego | L 73–83 | 18:13 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-01 | UC Riverside | W 88–45 | 14:20 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-14 | UTEP | W 66–61 | 17:28 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | Cal St. Fullerton | W 69–59 | 16:37 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 110.0% |
| 2025-12-05 | UC Davis | W 75–69 | 14:11 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-29 | North Dakota | W 92–55 | 15:42 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 5-7 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-21 | Arizona St. | L 76–83 | 14:45 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-16 | Utah Tech | W 68–62 | 16:28 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 5-7 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Manhattan | W 86–56 | 18:46 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 85.7% |
| 2025-11-13 | Mississippi Val. | W 88–56 | 14:47 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-10 | East Texas A&M | W 100–74 | 17:16 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 6-7 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | Oregon | L 59–60 | 30:19 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 2-5 | 50.0% |