Jacen Holloway
Army West Point · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
831:01 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 28:39
- Points per game
- 10.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 2.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.7 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.0 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 311 | 104 | 60 | 11 | 5 | 47 | 65 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 114–224 | 50.9% | 7.7 | 10.8 |
| 2P | 98–173 | 56.6% | 6.0 | 8.3 |
| 3P | 16–51 | 31.4% | 1.8 | 2.5 |
| FT | 67–104 | 64.4% | 3.6 | 5.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.5% | 57.6% | 22.8% | 46.4% | 1.28 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Army · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Army: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Army | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.7 | -2.9 to -0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | -1.4 | +2.9range +2.5 to +3.4 | 2,698 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Army | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.9 | -2.1 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | -0.4 | +1.0range +0.8 to +1.3 | 927 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27:48 | 28:39 | 8:30–39:06 | |
| Points | 12.0 | 10.7 | 2.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 65.3% | 56.4% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-03 | Bucknell | L 55–65 | 34:24 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-9 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Lafayette | L 77–83 | 27:31 | 21 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6-10 | 2-4 | 7-9 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | Bucknell | L 73–75 | 29:24 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 2-3 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Navy | L 63–81 | 15:37 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Loyola Maryland | W 87–77 | 32:06 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-11 | 0-2 | 9-11 | 36.4% |
| 2026-02-14 | American | L 63–75 | 26:32 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-6 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-11 | Boston U. | L 68–85 | 28:07 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-10 | 3-4 | 4-5 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Lafayette | L 60–63 | 25:44 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-13 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 38.5% |
| 2026-02-04 | Colgate | L 55–69 | 27:55 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 2-6 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Holy Cross | W 69–68 | 8:30 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Navy | L 56–84 | 22:46 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Bucknell | W 87–84 | 39:06 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6-12 | 0-2 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-18 | American | L 67–78 | 32:45 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-12 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-14 | Holy Cross | L 75–82 | 33:11 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 78.6% |
| 2026-01-10 | Boston U. | L 91–100 | 20:43 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Loyola Maryland | L 76–84 | 36:33 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-03 | Colgate | L 69–76 | 27:23 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-31 | Lehigh | W 85–78 | 29:36 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 5-8 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-23 | Binghamton | W 95–85 | 33:57 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-1 | 0-4 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-12 | UMBC | W 63–60 | 33:27 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 44.4% |
| 2025-12-02 | George Washington | L 70–84 | 33:17 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-29 | Manhattan | W 81–78 | 36:01 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-26 | FDU | W 81–73 | 31:51 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | East Texas A&M | L 67–84 | 31:30 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Marist | L 65–76 | 23:43 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Cornell | L 73–86 | 33:38 | 22 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9-14 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-15 | Harvard | L 52–75 | 22:19 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Duke | L 59–114 | 23:54 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-08 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 76–83 | 29:31 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-7 | 1-3 | 5-6 | 78.6% |