BJ Plummer
North Florida · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
815:11 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 27:10
- Points per game
- 7.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.3 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.2 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.6 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 217 | 99 | 34 | 18 | 7 | 37 | 66 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 80–201 | 39.8% | 6.7 | 9.9 |
| 2P | 43–82 | 52.4%† | 2.7 | 4.0 |
| 3P | 37–119 | 31.1% | 4.0 | 5.8 |
| FT | 20–30 | 66.7% | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.0% | 50.7% | 59.2% | 14.9% | 0.92 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
North Florida · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $12K
- 80% range $1K to $56K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.5%
- team pool $200K, 80% range $75K to $515K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $11K to $12K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 65.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
North Florida: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | North Florida | $12Kspeculative | $1K to $56K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -2.0 | -3.3 to -0.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -2.5 | +2.3range +1.8 to +2.7 | 2,085 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:28 | 27:10 | 16:14–36:27 | |
| Points | 7.0 | 7.2 | 0.0–20.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 42.8% | 49.3% | 0.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-04 | West Ga. | L 85–93 | 34:06 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Jacksonville | L 61–85 | 25:23 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-26 | FGCU | W 76–70 | 31:43 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-8 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 56.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Stetson | L 71–76 | 32:34 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-19 | Austin Peay | L 76–77 | 33:35 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 28.6% |
| 2026-02-14 | Jacksonville | L 56–63 | 24:00 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-11 · NCAA | FGCU | L 81–90 | 32:06 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Queens (NC) | L 72–91 | 27:48 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 90.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | West Ga. | W 81–73 | 30:40 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Lipscomb | L 94–100 | 25:12 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-01-29 | Stetson | L 77–84 | 23:27 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Bellarmine | W 117–114 | 36:27 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4-9 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-22 | Eastern Ky. | W 87–85 | 31:14 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8-13 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 69.2% |
| 2026-01-17 | Central Ark. | L 69–98 | 28:27 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-9 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-15 | North Ala. | W 105–91 | 34:01 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | Queens (NC) | L 82–89 | 32:27 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-9 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 27.8% |
| 2026-01-08 | West Ga. | L 73–85 | 32:08 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Lipscomb | L 74–82 | 32:34 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3-11 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 31.8% |
| 2026-01-01 | Austin Peay | L 83–102 | 30:04 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4-10 | 2-8 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Columbia | L 82–90 | 21:05 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-21 | Miami (FL) | L 67–105 | 20:10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-18 | Charleston So. | L 90–113 | 28:56 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-13 | Dayton | L 61–84 | 26:11 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-07 | Gonzaga | L 58–109 | 18:18 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-02 | SIUE | L 63–72 | 27:54 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Prairie View | L 82–85 | 19:17 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-22 | Southern Miss. | L 83–92 | 23:30 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-19 · NCAA | Wofford | L 78–86 | 19:06 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-7 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | Tennessee | L 66–99 | 16:14 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 125.0% |
| 2025-11-06 | Florida | L 64–104 | 16:34 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0.0% |