Le Moyne

NEC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 216 · Raw net -2.3 · Tempo 69.2 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-04

Record: 14–17; 14 wins
AdjNet: -7.7β; rank 276 of 365
AdjO: 103.2β; rank 285 of 365
AdjD: 110.9β; rank 243 of 365
AdjT: 70.0β
SOS: -6.9β; rank 348 of 363
NCSOS: -0.3β
WAB: -12.7β; rank 276 of 363
RR: -1.6β
Exp. W: 15.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	104.5262	106.8126	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.7119	49.375	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	19.1327	15.0288	16.7
Offensive rebound %	25.2337	29.1107	30.6
FTA / FGA %	39.568	32.7121	35.0
Shooting
3P%	34.3152	36.0302	33.9
2P%	53.5108	46.114	51.7
FT%	71.8214	73.8256	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	40.8	39.7	39.5
Assists / FGM %	56.5	54.9	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.1	9.5	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	31.4	35.0	31.4
2-pointers %	47.4	45.4	48.8
Free throws %	21.2	19.6	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.4
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 30%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-06	Xavier	L 69–74	68.7	Away	0–1
11-09	Bowling Green	L 60–83	70.4	Away	0–2
11-13	Massachusetts	L 80–94	76.4	Away	0–3
11-17	Niagara	W 74–68	67.1	Home	1–3
11-22	Fairfield	L 83–97	70.6	Home	1–4
11-28	Lafayette	W 76–63	69.1	Away	2–4
11-29	Monmouth	W 83–79	68.4	Neutral	3–4
11-30	Ball St.	L 85–96	68.9	Neutral	3–5
12-06	Binghamton	W 78–63	66.3	Away	4–5
12-16	Texas	L 53–95	73.9	Away	4–6
12-20	St. Bonaventure	L 81–92	68.0	Away	4–7
12-28	Boston College	L 64–72	73.0	Away	4–8
01-02	Saint Francis	W 84–58	67.1	Away	5–8
01-04	Mercyhurst	L 60–74	63.8	Away	5–9
01-08	New Haven	W 73–47	61.2	Home	6–9
01-10	Central Conn. St.	L 59–69	71.0	Home	6–10
01-17	Chicago St.	W 72–57	68.9	Away	7–10
01-19	LIU	W 83–77	71.2	Home	8–10
01-23	Wagner	W 69–67	60.9	Home	9–10
01-26	FDU	W 87–74	66.5	Away	10–10
01-29	LIU	L 61–83	75.6	Away	10–11
01-31	Stonehill	L 54–65	71.4	Home	10–12
02-05	Wagner	L 78–79	68.5	Away	10–13
02-07	Saint Francis	W 86–84	76.8	Home	11–13
02-12	Mercyhurst	W 58–57	68.9	Home	12–13
02-14	Chicago St.	W 81–63	68.9	Home	13–13
02-19	Central Conn. St.	L 77–78	70.8	Away	13–14
02-21	Stonehill	L 68–77	70.4	Away	13–15
02-26	FDU	W 76–59	64.0	Home	14–15
02-28	New Haven	L 59–66	68.2	Away	14–16
03-04	Stonehill	L 71–81	70.5	Home	14–17

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Trent Mosquera	31	32:03	80.1%	427	182	71	40	22	64	83	66–139	47.5%	77–215	35.8%	64–87	73.6%	51.3%	54.4%	24.6%	5	30:17 −1:46	75.7%	11.6 −2.2
Deng Garang	31	30:56	77.3%	329	161	29	35	17	47	82	77–142	54.2%	42–124	33.9%	49–69	71.0%	52.6%	55.5%	25.9%	5	36:00 +5:05	90.0%	11.6 +1.0
Jakai Sanders	28	30:26	68.7%	303	95	122	24	0	68	44	61–146	41.8%	27–74	36.5%	100–134	74.6%	46.1%	54.3%	60.9%	4	27:13 −3:13	54.4%	11.0 +0.2
Shilo Jackson	26	30:27	63.9%	418	213	57	14	41	67	87	156–248	62.9%	1–2	50.0%†	103–141	73.0%	63.0%	67.0%	56.4%	5	31:10 +0:43	77.9%	17.4 +1.3
Tennessee Rainwater	31	24:34	61.4%	302	136	53	23	7	56	83	75–126	59.5%	21–42	50.0%†	89–133	66.9%	63.4%	66.7%	79.2%	5	31:07 +6:34	77.8%	11.2 +1.5
Jakob Blakley	31	16:17	40.7%	134	36	18	2	0	13	34	16–35	45.7%	27–84	32.1%	21–24	87.5%†	47.5%	51.7%	20.2%	5	16:18 +0:01	40.7%	3.2 −1.1
Samuel Hincapie	30	15:32	37.6%	148	63	21	5	2	19	32	43–79	54.4%	14–52	26.9%	20–35	57.1%	48.9%	50.5%	26.7%	4	13:41 −1:51	27.4%	2.3 −2.7
Eli Greenberg	30	13:46	33.3%	69	36	46	14	2	32	53	11–28	39.3%†	11–40	27.5%†	14–18	77.8%†	40.4%†	45.4%†	26.5%†	5	11:50 −1:56	29.6%	1.6 −0.7
Isaac Nyakundi	24	9:31	18.4%	49	38	5	6	11	12	28	17–30	56.7%†	3–12	25.0%†	6–11	54.5%†	51.2%†	52.3%†	26.2%†	3	1:34 −7:57	2.3%	0.0 −2.0
Trevor Roe	16	6:55	8.9%	41	17	4	4	0	3	9	5–9	55.6%†	9–27	33.3%†	4–4	100.0%†	51.4%†	54.3%†	11.1%†	3	14:07 +7:12	21.2%	5.0 +2.4
Josiah LeeUnder 100 minutes	15	3:47	4.6%	11	3	2	2	0	1	6	0–0	—	3–10	30.0%†	2–2	100.0%†	45.0%†	50.6%†	20.0%†	2	0:40 −3:06	0.7%	0.0 −0.7
Ametri MossFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	36:53	3.0%	10	7	5	1	0	2	1	4–8	50.0%†	0–3	0.0%†	2–2	100.0%†	36.4%†	42.1%†	18.2%†	—	—	—	—
Sam DonnellyFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	1:05	0.3%	1	1	0	0	0	1	0	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	1–2	50.0%†	0.0%†	26.6%†	200.0%†	1	0:45 −0:19	0.4%	0.0 −0.3
Kaelin ThomasFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	1:53	0.3%	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	31 games			2242	1077	433	not published	102	410	not published	531–993	53.5%	235–685	34.3%	475–662	71.8%	52.7%	56.9%	39.5%
Sum of players				2242	989	433	170	102	386	542	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+88	0	not published	0	+24	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Le Moyne College (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,798,253
Men's basketball expenses	$1,428,504
Athletics department expenses	$12,176,876
Athletics department revenue	$12,176,876

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 31 games, 2,145 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,242	2,291
Field goals made	766	787
Field goals attempted	1,678	1,868
3-pointers made	235	267
3-pointers attempted	685	741
Free throws made	475	450
Free throws attempted	662	610
Offensive rebounds	254	337
Defensive rebounds	823	755
Total rebounds	1,077	1,092
Assists	433	432
Blocks	102	94
Turnovers	410	321
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 170.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 542.
Minutes (derived)	6,200	not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,242	2,242	0	±11.2	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	766	766	0	±3.8	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,678	1,678	0	±8.4	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	235	235	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	685	685	0	±3.4	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	475	475	0	±2.4	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	662	662	0	±3.3	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,077	989	+88	±86.2	0
Assists	Reconciled	433	433	0	±2.2	0
Blocks	Reconciled	102	102	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	410	386	+24	±12.3	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	170	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	542	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,200	6,182	+17.9	±124.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Trent Mosquera	81.7%	+0.6range -0.9 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Deng Garang	77.4%	-1.5range -3.1 to -0.1Sufficient evidence
Jakai Sanders	69.9%	-1.6range -2.6 to -0.4Sufficient evidence
Shilo Jackson	64.7%	+2.0range +0.8 to +3.1Sufficient evidence
Tennessee Rainwater	59.5%	+1.8range +0.3 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Jakob Blakley	40.8%	-2.5range -3.6 to -0.9Sufficient evidence
Samuel Hincapie	38.3%	-0.9range -2.0 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Eli Greenberg	33.4%	+0.6range -0.4 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Isaac Nyakundi	18.8%	-1.0range -1.7 to -0.1Sufficient evidence
Trevor Roe	7.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Josiah Lee	4.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Ametri Moss	3.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Sam Donnelly	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Kaelin Thomas	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.0range +8.2 to +9.9Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 96.9% of on-court time. 5 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 3.1%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value