FDU

NEC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 325 · Raw net -11.7 · Tempo 64.1 · 29 Division I games · Through 2026-03-04

Record: 8–21; 8 wins
AdjNet: -13.6β; rank 332 of 365
AdjO: 101.5β; rank 316 of 365
AdjD: 115.1β; rank 325 of 365
AdjT: 65.5β
SOS: -4.7β; rank 314 of 363
NCSOS: 4.6β
WAB: -15.9β; rank 324 of 363
RR: -1.7β
Exp. W: 9.7β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	101.1312	112.8286	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	47.1333	55.2337	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	18.1280	16.1216	16.7
Offensive rebound %	32.0125	27.347	30.6
FTA / FGA %	32.8240	36.3216	35.0
Shooting
3P%	30.3339	37.8353	33.9
2P%	48.6296	54.1280	51.7
FT%	70.1272	71.3116	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	45.2	40.5	39.5
Assists / FGM %	51.0	51.3	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	4.8	9.4	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	35.0	33.7	31.4
2-pointers %	45.4	47.3	48.8
Free throws %	19.6	19.0	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 32%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Iowa St.	L 50–88	70.7	Away	0–1
11-08	Saint Peter's	L 83–93	74.2	Away	0–2
11-12	Texas	L 58–93	73.2	Away	0–3
11-15	NJIT	L 81–93	77.0	Away	0–4
11-24	East Texas A&M	L 65–70	66.9	Home	0–5
11-26	Army West Point	L 73–81	66.8	Home	0–6
12-02	Providence	L 64–94	65.7	Away	0–7
12-10	Fordham	L 54–75	64.2	Away	0–8
12-22	Boston College	L 61–72	60.3	Away	0–9
12-29	Minnesota	L 43–60	60.7	Away	0–10
01-02	Mercyhurst	W 74–67	64.0	Away	1–10
01-04	Saint Francis	L 82–85	72.0	Away	1–11
01-08	Chicago St.	W 70–63	66.1	Home	2–11
01-10	New Haven	L 55–65	62.5	Away	2–12
01-17	LIU	L 59–66	64.5	Home	2–13
01-19	Wagner	W 68–61	58.2	Home	3–13
01-23	Central Conn. St.	W 76–66	58.7	Away	4–13
01-26	Le Moyne	L 74–87	66.5	Home	4–14
01-29	Stonehill	L 57–58	60.1	Away	4–15
01-31	Wagner	L 72–75 1OT	68.6	Away	4–16
02-05	Stonehill	W 74–58	63.7	Home	5–16
02-07	Mercyhurst	W 55–52	54.3	Home	6–16
02-12	Saint Francis	W 66–59	65.4	Home	7–16
02-14	Central Conn. St.	L 57–63	56.5	Home	7–17
02-19	Chicago St.	W 60–59	52.9	Away	8–17
02-21	New Haven	L 77–84	62.8	Home	8–18
02-26	Le Moyne	L 59–76	64.0	Away	8–19
02-28	LIU	L 60–74	62.9	Away	8–20
03-04	Mercyhurst	L 61–70	64.8	Away	8–21

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 29 of 29 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Joey Niesman	29	34:26	85.7%	362	107	88	35	1	58	66	71–149	47.7%	53–156	34.0%	61–83	73.5%	49.3%	53.0%	27.2%	5	36:57 +2:31	92.4%	14.0 +1.5
Taeshaud Jackson	29	29:26	73.3%	302	243	45	27	14	51	85	99–192	51.6%	9–46	19.6%†	77–99	77.8%	47.3%	53.6%	41.6%	5	29:50 +0:24	74.6%	8.6 −1.8
Eric Parnell	29	25:51	64.3%	319	64	17	13	3	13	52	35–68	51.5%	74–222	33.3%	27–33	81.8%	50.3%	52.4%	11.4%	5	16:51 −9:00	42.1%	7.0 −4.0
Cyril Martynov	29	25:42	64.0%	219	154	59	7	5	54	52	85–159	53.5%	1–7	14.3%†	46–89	51.7%	52.1%	53.4%	53.6%	5	29:35 +3:53	74.0%	10.2 +2.6
David Jevtic	28	20:54	50.2%	184	93	33	12	3	38	40	34–72	47.2%	29–86	33.7%	29–46	63.0%	49.1%	51.6%	29.1%	5	20:16 −0:38	50.7%	6.2 −0.4
Arthur Cox	27	19:59	46.3%	240	95	33	10	8	43	59	60–116	51.7%	18–64	28.1%	66–85	77.6%	48.3%	55.2%	47.2%	5	20:14 +0:15	50.6%	9.4 +0.5
Raysean Johnson	28	16:57	40.7%	121	47	19	21	0	27	55	25–55	45.5%	12–46	26.1%†	35–51	68.6%	42.6%	49.0%	50.5%	5	15:52 −1:05	39.7%	2.8 −1.5
Noah Melson	22	16:57	32.0%	104	30	10	3	4	11	31	16–46	34.8%	21–76	27.6%	9–19	47.4%†	38.9%	39.9%	15.6%	3	9:21 −7:36	14.0%	2.7 −2.1
Ras Elijah Godbolt	27	11:30	26.7%	26	19	25	10	1	7	45	4–20	20.0%†	2–15	13.3%†	12–13	92.3%†	20.0%†	31.9%†	37.1%†	5	21:24 +9:53	53.5%	3.0 +2.0
Josiah FrancisUnder 100 minutes	12	5:24	5.6%	3	14	0	0	2	5	10	0–4	0.0%†	1–7	14.3%†	0–0	—	13.6%†	13.6%†	0.0%†	1	3:01 −2:23	1.5%	0.0 −0.3
Sebastian HaubroUnder 100 minutes	20	3:06	5.3%	5	12	2	1	2	4	8	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	5–6	83.3%†	0.0%†	53.9%†	300.0%†	2	2:43 −0:22	2.7%	0.5 +0.3
Chidube EkwommaduFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	8:12	1.4%	0	1	0	0	0	2	1	0–0	—	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Tyler McQuaidFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	1:06	0.4%	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	0–0	—	0–0	—	2–2	100.0%†	—	113.6%†	—	1	1:19 +0:13	0.7%	2.0 +1.5
Cole AlexanderFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	0:57	0.3%	1	2	0	0	0	0	1	0–0	—	0–0	—	1–2	50.0%†	—	56.8%†	—	2	1:05 +0:08	1.1%	0.0 −0.3
Team, games with logs · season totals	29 games			1888	984	331	not published	44	339	not published	429–883	48.6%	220–727	30.3%	370–528	70.1%	47.1%	51.2%	32.8%
Sum of players				1888	881	331	139	43	313	506	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+103	0	not published	+1	+26	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Fairleigh Dickinson University-Metropolitan Campus (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,872,165	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$1,872,165
Athletics department expenses	$16,970,448
Athletics department revenue	$16,970,448

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 29 games, 1,868 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	1,888	2,107
Field goals made	649	735
Field goals attempted	1,610	1,547
3-pointers made	220	237
3-pointers attempted	727	627
Free throws made	370	400
Free throws attempted	528	561
Offensive rebounds	333	245
Defensive rebounds	651	709
Total rebounds	984	954
Assists	331	377
Blocks	44	83
Turnovers	339	301
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 139.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 506.
Minutes (derived)	5,825	not published

29 of 29 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	1,888	1,888	0	±9.4	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	649	649	0	±3.2	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,610	1,610	0	±8.1	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	220	220	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	727	727	0	±3.6	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	370	370	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	528	528	0	±2.6	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	984	881	+103	±78.7	0
Assists	Reconciled	331	331	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	44	43	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	339	313	+26	±10.2	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	139	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	506	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,825	5,781	+43.7	±116.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Joey Niesman	85.3%	-1.4range -2.3 to -0.6Sufficient evidence
Taeshaud Jackson	74.3%	-1.9range -3.2 to -0.4Sufficient evidence
Eric Parnell	66.0%	+1.0range -0.3 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Cyril Martynov	63.2%	-1.4range -2.5 to -0.1Sufficient evidence
David Jevtic	49.4%	-1.4range -2.6 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Arthur Cox	47.7%	-0.7range -2.2 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Raysean Johnson	40.2%	-2.1range -3.4 to -0.7Sufficient evidence
Noah Melson	32.8%	-4.0range -5.1 to -2.9Sufficient evidence
Ras Elijah Godbolt	27.6%	-0.7range -1.9 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Josiah Francis	5.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Sebastian Haubro	5.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Chidube Ekwommadu	1.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Tyler McQuaid	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Cole Alexander	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +8.0range +7.1 to +8.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 97.3% of on-court time. 5 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.7%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value

FDU