Omaha

Sum · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 257 · Raw net -5.5 · Tempo 68.6 · 29 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

Record: 12–17; 12 wins
AdjNet: -6.6β; rank 260 of 365
AdjO: 105.6β; rank 235 of 365
AdjD: 112.3β; rank 275 of 365
AdjT: 68.1β
SOS: -2.3β; rank 239 of 363
NCSOS: 2.6β
WAB: -11.3β; rank 243 of 363
RR: 0.4β
Exp. W: 11.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	107.2205	112.7281	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.2139	52.7258	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	16.1145	14.1333	16.7
Offensive rebound %	25.5330	28.790	30.6
FTA / FGA %	34.5195	33.6142	35.0
Shooting
3P%	34.0170	32.9114	33.9
2P%	53.0130	55.6318	51.7
FT%	73.2167	72.4176	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	40.9	45.5	39.5
Assists / FGM %	46.9	53.4	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.1	10.5	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	32.2	34.6	31.4
2-pointers %	48.3	46.6	48.8
Free throws %	19.5	18.7	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.3
Top Three Share of Minutes: 43%
Bench Share of Minutes: 36%
Players with Logged Minutes: 12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Murray St.	L 77–85	79.1	Neutral	0–1
11-06	Abilene Christian	L 71–73	68.8	Away	0–2
11-09	Colorado St.	L 74–97	65.4	Away	0–3
11-15	Southern Utah	W 90–85	74.5	Home	1–3
11-21	LSU	L 73–99	77.6	Away	1–4
11-25	James Madison	L 77–88	64.8	Neutral	1–5
11-26	FIU	L 61–74	72.0	Away	1–6
12-03	Northern Colo.	L 70–75	66.3	Home	1–7
12-06	Portland St.	W 60–55	57.8	Away	2–7
12-20	Lamar University	W 85–82 1OT	73.2	Away	3–7
12-28	Oregon	L 57–80	63.6	Away	3–8
01-01	South Dakota St.	L 69–84	70.0	Away	3–9
01-03	Kansas City	L 66–73	67.8	Home	3–10
01-08	North Dakota	W 90–79	68.4	Home	4–10
01-10	North Dakota St.	L 76–78	61.9	Home	4–11
01-17	Oral Roberts	W 73–62	67.2	Away	5–11
01-21	South Dakota	L 64–68	72.2	Home	5–12
01-24	Kansas City	W 77–60	73.8	Away	6–12
01-28	South Dakota St.	W 80–71	70.2	Home	7–12
01-31	Denver	W 84–82	71.8	Away	8–12
02-05	North Dakota	L 73–76	68.3	Away	8–13
02-07	North Dakota St.	L 84–92	67.1	Away	8–14
02-12	St. Thomas (MN)	W 98–94	74.0	Home	9–14
02-15	Denver	W 83–76	66.0	Home	10–14
02-18	Oral Roberts	W 80–71	66.0	Home	11–14
02-25	South Dakota	L 72–89	73.3	Away	11–15
02-28	St. Thomas (MN)	L 53–68	65.2	Away	11–16
03-06	South Dakota	W 76–62	64.7	Neutral	12–16
03-07	North Dakota St.	L 50–74	67.8	Neutral	12–17

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 29 of 29 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Tony Osburn	27	32:48	76.0%	13.7	3.6	2.6	1.2	0.1	1.3	1.8	39–83	47.0%	62–169	36.7%	40–52	76.9%	52.4%	55.3%	20.6%	5	30:50 −1:57	77.1%	5.6 −5.7
Lance Waddles	29	29:04	72.4%	16.0	6.4	2.7	1.0	0.2	1.9	2.8	70–134	52.2%	56–165	33.9%	30–45	66.7%	51.5%	53.0%	15.1%	5	30:14 +1:10	75.6%	12.2 +0.5
Grant Stubblefield	26	28:28	63.5%	13.0	4.3	4.6	2.4	0.4	2.2	3.5	75–130	57.7%	13–39	33.3%†	52–67	77.6%	55.9%	60.7%	39.6%	5	29:28 +1:00	73.6%	6.4 −2.9
Ja'Sean Glover	27	24:36	57.0%	18.1	5.8	3.0	1.1	0.3	3.1	3.1	69–136	50.7%	22–83	26.5%	97–111	87.4%	46.6%	56.2%	50.7%	5	26:33 +1:58	66.4%	17.4 +6.3
Paul Djobet	20	29:51	51.2%	23.4	8.8	2.6	1.1	0.6	3.2	3.4	94–168	56.0%	34–82	41.5%	59–82	72.0%	58.0%	61.0%	32.8%	5	30:00 +0:09	75.0%	11.2 −6.3
Kamryn Thomas	25	20:33	44.1%	7.6	6.8	1.4	0.6	0.7	2.3	3.1	22–52	42.3%†	9–39	23.1%†	27–43	62.8%	39.0%†	44.6%†	47.3%†	5	12:08 −8:25	30.3%	1.6 −2.3
Brock Scholl	29	13:58	34.8%	10.7	9.2	0.8	0.7	1.7	0.7	4.5	39–90	43.3%†	1–3	33.3%†	27–40	67.5%	43.5%†	48.8%†	43.0%†	5	2:54 −11:04	7.2%	0.8 −2.9
Christian Richardson	23	15:11	30.0%	17.2	6.4	0.0	1.1	1.7	2.6	6.6	59–79	74.7%†	0–0	—	32–55	58.2%	74.7%†	72.7%†	69.6%†	3	5:54 −9:17	8.8%	2.3 −4.2
Khamani Cooper	23	13:56	27.5%	12.9	2.5	2.1	1.1	0.1	2.7	4.7	20–45	44.4%†	15–42	35.7%†	18–22	81.8%†	48.9%†	53.3%†	25.3%†	4	4:42 −9:14	9.4%	1.5 −3.0
Valentino Simon	26	12:11	27.2%	10.5	8.6	1.9	0.3	1.6	1.5	4.4	26–50	52.0%†	0–3	0.0%†	31–49	63.3%	49.1%†	55.7%†	92.5%†	5	21:50 +9:39	54.6%	5.8 +2.6
Julian Margrave	17	9:06	13.3%	16.8	3.6	1.3	0.3	0.8	1.0	5.4	5–10	50.0%†	17–50	34.0%	4–4	100.0%†	50.8%†	52.6%†	6.7%†	4	9:21 +0:14	18.7%	3.3 −0.6
Aidan SkradisFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	1:50	1.4%	7.3	4.8	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	4.8	0–1	0.0%†	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	75.0%†	75.0%†	0.0%†	3	0:58 −0:52	1.5%	0.0 −0.3
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	29 games			73.6	33.5	12.1	not published	3.0	11.0	not published	518–978	53.0%	230–676	34.0%	417–570	73.2%	52.2%	56.3%	34.5%
Sum of players				73.6	29.7	12.1	5.6	3.0	10.5	17.3	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.8	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.5	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Nebraska at Omaha (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,458,331
Men's basketball expenses	$3,573,740
Athletics department expenses	$29,147,554
Athletics department revenue	$29,147,554

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 29 games, 1,999 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1165 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	73.6	77.3
Field goals made	25.7	27.0
Field goals attempted	56.8	59.6
3-pointers made	7.9	8.9
3-pointers attempted	23.2	27.1
Free throws made	14.3	14.5
Free throws attempted	19.6	20.0
Offensive rebounds	8.5	10.1
Defensive rebounds	25.0	24.8
Total rebounds	33.5	34.9
Assists	12.1	14.4
Blocks	3.0	3.5
Turnovers	11.0	9.6
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 164.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 504.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

29 of 29 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,143	2,143	0	±10.7	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	748	748	0	±3.7	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,654	1,654	0	±8.3	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	230	230	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	676	676	0	±3.4	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	417	417	0	±2.1	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	570	570	0	±2.9	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	976	864	+112	±78.1	0
Assists	Reconciled	351	351	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	86	86	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	321	307	+14	±9.6	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	164	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	504	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,825	5,806	+19.0	±116.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Tony Osburn	75.3%	-1.1range -2.0 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Lance Waddles	74.8%	-0.4range -1.4 to +0.7Sufficient evidence
Grant Stubblefield	61.3%	+0.6range -0.3 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Ja'Sean Glover	55.1%	-0.9range -1.8 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Paul Djobet	52.2%	+2.3range +1.3 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Kamryn Thomas	45.9%	-1.1range -2.3 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Brock Scholl	36.8%	-0.4range -1.6 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Christian Richardson	32.0%	+1.6range +0.7 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Khamani Cooper	27.3%	-1.9range -2.9 to -0.9Sufficient evidence
Valentino Simon	21.9%	+0.5range -0.7 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Julian Margrave	15.7%	-0.3range -1.1 to +0.5Limited evidence
Aidan Skradis	1.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.3range +8.4 to +10.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.7% of on-court time. 1 without a value (under 300 possessions) holds 0.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 3.1%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value