NE Omaha

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for NE Omaha, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Tony Osburn	75.3%	-1.1range -2.0 to +0.1Sufficient evidence	+3.7range +3.2 to +4.2Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Lance Waddles	74.8%	-0.4range -1.4 to +0.7Sufficient evidence	+4.0range +3.5 to +4.5Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Grant Stubblefield	61.3%	+0.6range -0.3 to +1.6Sufficient evidence	+3.7range +3.3 to +4.0Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Ja'Sean Glover	55.1%	-0.9range -1.8 to +0.2Sufficient evidence	+2.8range +2.5 to +3.2Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Paul Djobet	52.2%	+2.3range +1.3 to +3.2Sufficient evidence	+3.6range +3.3 to +3.9Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Kamryn Thomas	45.9%	-1.1range -2.3 to +0.1Sufficient evidence	+2.3range +2.0 to +2.7Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Brock Scholl	36.8%	-0.4range -1.6 to +1.2Sufficient evidence	+2.0range +1.7 to +2.4Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Christian Richardson	32.0%	+1.6range +0.7 to +2.4Sufficient evidence	+2.2range +2.0 to +2.4Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Khamani Cooper	27.3%	-1.9range -2.9 to -0.9Sufficient evidence	+1.3range +1.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Valentino Simon	21.9%	+0.5range -0.7 to +1.5Sufficient evidence	+1.4range +1.2 to +1.5Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Julian Margrave	15.7%	-0.3range -1.1 to +0.5Limited evidence	+0.9range +0.8 to +1.0Limited evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Aidan Skradis	1.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Nebraska at Omaha (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,458,331
Men's basketball expenses	$3,573,740
Athletics department expenses	$29,147,554
Athletics department revenue	$29,147,554

Coverage and exclusions

23 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (79%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

6 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue	$2,458,331	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$3,573,740	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
1 day	2
2 days	3
3 or more days	23

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	3
Longest run of consecutive away games	4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology