Creighton

BE · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 178 · Raw net -0.0 · Tempo 68.6 · 34 Division I games · Through 2026-04-04

Record: 16–18; 16 wins
AdjNet: 6.6β; rank 87 of 365
AdjO: 112.8β; rank 84 of 365
AdjD: 106.2β; rank 118 of 365
AdjT: 68.6β
SOS: 7.6β; rank 45 of 363
NCSOS: 2.7β
WAB: -5.0β; rank 106 of 363
RR: 0.0β
Exp. W: 16.0β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	109.1156	109.2198	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	53.0103	51.1165	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	16.3161	13.7341	16.7
Offensive rebound %	26.9302	29.5132	30.6
FTA / FGA %	28.3340	24.85	35.0
Shooting
3P%	34.1168	35.1255	33.9
2P%	54.764	50.3113	51.7
FT%	76.444	70.258	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	48.2	32.1	39.5
Assists / FGM %	58.4	50.2	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	6.6	10.5	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	38.6	28.3	31.4
2-pointers %	44.4	57.2	48.8
Free throws %	16.9	14.5	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.5
Top Three Share of Minutes: 44%
Bench Share of Minutes: 37%
Players with Logged Minutes: 15

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-05	South Dakota	W 92–76	72.9	Home	1–0
11-11	Gonzaga	L 63–90	71.9	Away	1–1
11-14	UMES	W 84–45	64.5	Home	2–1
11-19	North Dakota	W 75–60	64.5	Home	3–1
11-24	Baylor	L 74–81	67.7	Neutral	3–2
11-25	Iowa St.	L 60–78	67.9	Neutral	3–3
11-27	Oregon	W 76–66	67.6	Neutral	4–3
12-02	Nicholls	W 96–76	68.5	Home	5–3
12-07	Nebraska	L 50–71	63.8	Away	5–4
12-13	Kansas St.	L 76–83	66.6	Home	5–5
12-17	Xavier	W 98–57	73.8	Away	6–5
12-20	Marquette	W 84–63	77.0	Home	7–5
12-22	Utah Tech	W 92–69	72.0	Home	8–5
12-30	Butler	W 89–85	72.6	Home	9–5
01-04	Seton Hall	L 54–56	63.3	Away	9–6
01-07	Villanova	W 76–72	62.9	Away	10–6
01-10	St. John's (NY)	L 73–90	67.0	Home	10–7
01-13	Georgetown	W 86–83 1OT	64.4	Home	11–7
01-16	Providence	L 88–93	76.2	Away	11–8
01-21	Xavier	W 94–93	72.6	Home	12–8
01-27	Marquette	L 62–86	69.0	Away	12–9
01-31	UConn	L 58–85	59.4	Home	12–10
02-04	Georgetown	L 68–76	73.7	Away	12–11
02-07	Seton Hall	W 69–68	66.7	Home	13–11
02-11	DePaul	L 71–72	61.9	Away	13–12
02-14	Villanova	L 69–80	69.4	Home	13–13
02-18	UConn	W 91–84	75.4	Away	14–13
02-21	St. John's (NY)	L 52–81	74.7	Away	14–14
02-25	DePaul	L 71–72	65.0	Home	14–15
02-28	Providence	L 76–79	67.9	Home	14–16
03-04	Butler	W 76–59	70.8	Away	15–16
03-12	Seton Hall	L 61–72	68.9	Neutral	15–17
04-02	Rutgers	W 82–69	74.4	—	16–17
04-04	West Virginia	L 70–87	67.6	—	16–18

Roster · 15 players

Player logs in 34 of 34 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Josh Dix	34	32:53	81.9%	449	127	79	31	10	40	41	95–170	55.9%	69–204	33.8%	52–60	86.7%	53.1%	56.1%	16.0%	5	34:49 +1:56	87.0%	18.8 +5.6
Jasen Green	33	28:19	68.5%	346	209	80	25	30	46	55	115–191	60.2%	20–57	35.1%	56–84	66.7%	58.5%	60.7%	33.9%	5	32:16 +3:56	80.6%	11.8 +1.3
Nik Graves	34	26:50	66.8%	372	102	149	32	4	56	72	72–150	48.0%	38–134	28.4%	114–135	84.4%	45.4%	54.2%	47.5%	5	30:41 +3:52	76.7%	14.8 +3.9
Austin Swartz	30	21:34	47.4%	327	85	42	20	4	35	38	59–109	54.1%	64–167	38.3%	17–24	70.8%†	56.2%	57.1%	8.7%	3	24:42 +3:09	37.1%	13.3 +2.4
Isaac Traudt	34	18:53	47.0%	221	84	15	6	1	15	43	12–22	54.5%	60–160	37.5%	17–20	85.0%†	56.0%	57.9%	11.0%	5	19:16 +0:23	48.1%	5.0 −1.5
Blake Harper	34	18:18	45.6%	262	124	40	17	2	45	62	63–124	50.8%	20–55	36.4%	76–98	77.6%	52.0%	59.0%	54.7%	5	15:17 −3:02	38.2%	3.8 −3.9
Fedor Zugic	34	16:07	40.2%	176	67	32	10	5	26	43	28–52	53.8%	29–95	30.5%	33–40	82.5%	48.6%	53.5%	27.2%	5	20:52 +4:45	52.2%	2.4 −2.8
Ty Davis	33	11:02	26.7%	41	52	38	11	1	27	27	7–17	41.2%†	4–20	20.0%†	15–19	78.9%†	35.1%†	45.2%†	51.4%†	5	5:15 −5:46	13.1%	0.4 −0.8
Owen Freeman	26	12:01	22.9%	130	104	23	14	22	17	34	56–93	60.2%†	0–0	—	18–28	64.3%	60.2%†	61.7%†	30.1%†	2	5:36 −6:25	5.6%	1.0 −4.0
Hudson Greer	22	13:33	21.8%	103	45	9	12	5	18	27	18–36	50.0%†	19–47	40.4%†	10–16	62.5%†	56.0%†	57.2%†	19.3%†	5	15:23 +1:50	38.5%	5.4 +0.7
Kerem Konan	30	8:20	18.3%	79	55	11	7	9	17	32	30–50	60.0%†	0–0	—	19–29	65.5%	60.0%†	62.9%†	58.0%†	5	7:42 −0:38	19.2%	1.6 −1.0
Jackson McAndrewFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	20:28	6.0%	27	18	2	3	1	1	8	3–8	37.5%†	6–21	28.6%†	3–6	50.0%†	41.4%†	42.7%†	20.7%†	—	—	—	—
Shane ThomasUnder 100 minutes	18	3:23	4.5%	15	12	4	3	1	4	5	6–10	60.0%†	0–3	0.0%†	3–8	37.5%†	46.2%†	45.4%†	61.5%†	3	1:42 −1:42	2.5%	1.0 +0.2
Liam McChesneyFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	2:02	0.6%	2	2	0	1	1	2	1	1–2	50.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	25.0%†	25.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Josh Townley-ThomasFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	5:25	0.4%	6	0	0	0	0	1	2	3–4	75.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	75.0%†	75.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	34 games			2556	1195	524	not published	96	383	not published	568–1038	54.7%	329–965	34.1%	433–567	76.4%	53.0%	56.7%	28.3%
Sum of players				2556	1086	524	192	96	350	490	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+109	0	not published	0	+33	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.10M; 80% Range $1.75M to $5.45M
Tier: Big East and Gonzaga; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.00M to $3.35M; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 15; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Josh Dix	82.0%	$575K	$270K to $1.15M	18.1%	$555K to $615K	$20K	Sufficient evidence
Jasen Green	68.1%	$450K	$200K to $900K	14.6%	$435K to $480K	$20K	Sufficient evidence
Nik Graves	66.4%	$475K	$215K to $980K	15.1%	$460K to $510K	$20K	Sufficient evidence
Austin Swartz	47.1%	$120K	$17K to $325K	4.5%	$115K to $130K	$20K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaac Traudt	47.0%	$470K	$225K to $1.10M	14.0%	$455K to $505K	$20K	Sufficient evidence
Blake Harper	46.0%	$175K	$29K to $390K	6.4%	$170K to $185K	$20K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Fedor Zugic	41.2%	$105K	$17K to $280K	4.1%	$100K to $110K	$20K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ty Davis	27.7%	$77K	$16K to $210K	3.0%	$75K to $83K	$20K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Owen Freeman	22.5%	$215K	$105K to $470K	6.6%	$210K to $235K	$20K	Sufficient evidence
Hudson Greer	22.0%	$53K	$14K to $155K	2.0%	$51K to $56K	$20K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kerem Konan	18.6%	$84K	$27K to $180K	3.1%	$82K to $91K	$20K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jackson McAndrew	5.9%	$20K	$10K to $39K	0.7%	$19K to $21K	$20K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Shane Thomas	4.6%	$20K	$10K to $39K	0.7%	$19K to $21K	$20K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Liam McChesney	0.6%	$20K	$10K to $39K	0.7%	$19K to $21K	$20K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Josh Townley-Thomas	0.4%	$20K	$10K to $39K	0.7%	$19K to $21K	$20K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.10M	$1.75M to $5.45M	100%	$3.00M to $3.35M	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Creighton University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$19,767,613
Men's basketball expenses	$14,019,614
Athletics department expenses	$41,012,865
Athletics department revenue	$41,012,865

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 34 games, 2,343 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,556	2,557
Field goals made	897	972
Field goals attempted	2,003	2,139
3-pointers made	329	241
3-pointers attempted	965	686
Free throws made	433	372
Free throws attempted	567	530
Offensive rebounds	314	368
Defensive rebounds	881	855
Total rebounds	1,195	1,223
Assists	524	488
Blocks	96	109
Turnovers	383	321
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 192.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 490.
Minutes (derived)	6,825	not published

34 of 34 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,556	2,556	0	±12.8	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	897	897	0	±4.5	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,003	2,003	0	±10.0	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	329	329	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	965	965	0	±4.8	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	433	433	0	±2.2	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	567	567	0	±2.8	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,195	1,086	+109	±95.6	0
Assists	Reconciled	524	524	0	±2.6	0
Blocks	Reconciled	96	96	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	383	350	+33	±11.5	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	192	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	490	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,825	6,805	+19.8	±136.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Josh Dix	82.0%	+2.3range +0.8 to +3.6Sufficient evidence
Jasen Green	68.1%	+2.0range +0.8 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Nik Graves	66.4%	+2.3range +0.7 to +4.0Sufficient evidence
Austin Swartz	47.1%	-0.7range -2.2 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Isaac Traudt	47.0%	+3.5range +2.1 to +5.0Sufficient evidence
Blake Harper	46.0%	+0.3range -1.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Fedor Zugic	41.2%	-0.8range -2.2 to +0.7Sufficient evidence
Ty Davis	27.7%	-0.6range -2.1 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Owen Freeman	22.5%	+3.1range +1.8 to +4.3Sufficient evidence
Hudson Greer	22.0%	-1.1range -1.9 to -0.4Sufficient evidence
Kerem Konan	18.6%	+0.5range -0.5 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Jackson McAndrew	5.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Shane Thomas	4.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Liam McChesney	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Josh Townley-Thomas	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.5range +9.5 to +11.6Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 97.7% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value