Blake Harper
Creighton · 2025–26 · 34 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
622:23 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 34
- Minutes per game
- 18:18
- Points per game
- 7.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 1.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.7 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.8 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 4.0 |
| Season totals | 262 | 124 | 40 | 17 | 2 | 45 | 62 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 83–179 | 46.4% | 5.3 | 11.5 |
| 2P | 63–124 | 50.8% | 3.6 | 8.0 |
| 3P | 20–55 | 36.4% | 1.6 | 3.5 |
| FT | 76–98 | 77.6% | 2.9 | 6.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.0% | 59.0% | 30.7% | 54.7% | 0.89 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Creighton · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $175K
- 80% range $29K to $390K
- Median share of team pool
- 6.4%
- team pool $3.10M, 80% range $1.75M to $5.45M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $170K to $185K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $20K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 46.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Creighton: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Creighton | $175Kspeculative | $29K to $390K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.3 | -1.2 to +1.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -0.2 | +3.1range +2.6 to +3.6 | 2,028 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Howard | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -2.0 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -2.0 | +2.8range +2.3 to +3.4 | 3,107 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 15:17 | 18:18 | 5:38–34:45 | |
| Points | 3.8 | 7.7 | 0.0–19.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 42.6% | 47.3% | 0.0%–133.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-04 | West Virginia | L 70–87 | 22:13 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-04-02 | Rutgers | W 82–69 | 24:08 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Seton Hall | L 61–72 | 6:33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-04 | Butler | W 76–59 | 5:38 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Providence | L 76–79 | 17:52 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-25 | DePaul | L 71–72 | 10:37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | St. John's (NY) | L 52–81 | 15:07 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | UConn | W 91–84 | 8:07 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 4-4 | 133.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | Villanova | L 69–80 | 13:28 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | DePaul | L 71–72 | 19:26 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Seton Hall | W 69–68 | 24:28 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Georgetown | L 68–76 | 19:59 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 2-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | UConn | L 58–85 | 25:33 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-27 | Marquette | L 62–86 | 21:59 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 93.8% |
| 2026-01-21 | Xavier | W 94–93 | 11:47 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-16 | Providence | L 88–93 | 26:28 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-10 | 2-4 | 6-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-13 | Georgetown | W 86–83 | 19:50 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | St. John's (NY) | L 73–90 | 17:18 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 5-5 | 116.7% |
| 2026-01-07 | Villanova | W 76–72 | 26:52 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 72.2% |
| 2026-01-04 | Seton Hall | L 54–56 | 14:12 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-30 · NCAA | Butler | W 89–85 | 8:18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Utah Tech | W 92–69 | 14:19 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 38.9% |
| 2025-12-20 | Marquette | W 84–63 | 18:09 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Xavier | W 98–57 | 19:01 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 3-4 | 80.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Kansas St. | L 76–83 | 6:05 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | Nebraska | L 50–71 | 14:45 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | Nicholls | W 96–76 | 16:49 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-27 | Oregon | W 76–66 | 34:45 | 18 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-12 | 0-1 | 6-8 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Iowa St. | L 60–78 | 16:02 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Baylor | L 74–81 | 22:10 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-7 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-19 · NCAA | North Dakota | W 75–60 | 26:18 | 19 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-11 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 72.7% |
| 2025-11-14 | UMES | W 84–45 | 23:04 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-11 | Gonzaga | L 63–90 | 25:07 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-6 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-05 | South Dakota | W 92–76 | 25:56 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 58.3% |