Wagner

NEC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 248 · Raw net -4.7 · Tempo 65.3 · 28 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

Record: 11–17; 11 wins
AdjNet: -8.4β; rank 285 of 365
AdjO: 104.2β; rank 266 of 365
AdjD: 112.6β; rank 280 of 365
AdjT: 66.6β
SOS: -5.5β; rank 333 of 363
NCSOS: 4.4β
WAB: -12.4β; rank 270 of 363
RR: -1.8β
Exp. W: 12.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	104.8253	109.5208	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	49.6262	50.4122	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	18.5300	14.9293	16.7
Offensive rebound %	32.897	29.6139	30.6
FTA / FGA %	32.3251	40.8309	35.0
Shooting
3P%	36.636	34.3202	33.9
2P%	46.6338	49.993	51.7
FT%	72.6186	71.8144	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	36.1	35.8	39.5
Assists / FGM %	49.0	54.0	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	6.5	10.4	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	32.3	28.3	31.4
2-pointers %	48.5	49.2	48.8
Free throws %	19.1	22.5	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.2
Top Three Share of Minutes: 40%
Bench Share of Minutes: 37%
Players with Logged Minutes: 12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	VCU	L 74–103	76.1	Away	0–1
11-07	Seton Hall	L 61–68	64.5	Away	0–2
11-11	Fordham	L 61–63	58.9	Away	0–3
11-16	UMBC	L 70–71 1OT	75.9	Away	0–4
11-22	Georgetown	L 75–92	74.7	Away	0–5
11-26	Manhattan	W 103–101 1OT	77.7	Away	1–5
12-02	Maryland	L 63–89	74.0	Away	1–6
12-17	UMES	W 78–64	65.0	Home	2–6
01-02	Chicago St.	W 79–72	64.0	Away	3–6
01-04	Stonehill	L 60–69	61.1	Home	3–7
01-08	Saint Francis	L 69–71	65.0	Home	3–8
01-10	Mercyhurst	L 69–70	64.8	Home	3–9
01-17	New Haven	L 74–80	60.5	Away	3–10
01-19	FDU	L 61–68	58.2	Away	3–11
01-23	Le Moyne	L 67–69	60.9	Away	3–12
01-29	Central Conn. St.	L 55–62	60.0	Home	3–13
01-31	FDU	W 75–72 1OT	68.6	Home	4–13
02-05	Le Moyne	W 79–78	68.5	Home	5–13
02-07	Central Conn. St.	L 67–84	65.7	Away	5–14
02-12	LIU	L 57–67	70.2	Home	5–15
02-14	Stonehill	W 68–57	65.9	Away	6–15
02-16	LIU	L 65–83	63.8	Away	6–16
02-19	Mercyhurst	W 83–80 1OT	74.5	Away	7–16
02-21	Saint Francis	W 65–56	65.0	Away	8–16
02-26	New Haven	W 65–62	62.3	Home	9–16
02-28	Chicago St.	W 80–61	68.9	Home	10–16
03-04	Central Conn. St.	W 70–60	61.4	Away	11–16
03-07	LIU	L 56–64	63.9	Away	11–17

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 28 of 28 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Nick Jones	28	32:13	79.1%	18.5	4.3	3.1	2.2	0.4	3.3	3.4	112–229	48.9%	29–101	28.7%	107–130	82.3%	47.1%	54.0%	39.4%	5	35:05 +2:52	87.7%	15.6 +0.7
Eddie Placer	27	24:59	59.2%	13.3	3.1	2.0	0.8	0.1	1.5	2.8	29–76	38.2%	48–117	41.0%	22–29	75.9%	52.3%	54.4%	15.0%	5	17:02 −7:58	42.6%	4.2 −4.1
John Awoke	26	25:14	57.5%	10.7	4.5	2.8	0.6	0.1	2.2	3.0	28–72	38.9%	34–86	39.5%	18–24	75.0%†	50.0%	52.2%	15.2%	5	32:17 +7:03	80.7%	9.0 +2.2
Jaden Baker	21	31:09	57.4%	12.1	4.5	3.5	0.7	0.4	2.6	2.1	39–107	36.4%	31–81	38.3%	27–35	77.1%	45.5%	48.7%	18.6%	—	—	—	—
Binael Basil	28	22:40	55.7%	15.3	10.5	2.0	0.8	0.7	2.6	4.5	91–158	57.6%	4–15	26.7%†	49–90	54.4%	56.1%	57.1%	52.0%	5	26:39 +3:59	66.6%	9.6 +0.9
Bryan Akanmu	28	20:38	50.7%	11.4	7.6	3.0	1.0	0.1	2.9	4.9	70–146	47.9%	0–5	0.0%†	25–37	67.6%	46.4%	49.3%	24.5%	5	23:13 +2:35	58.0%	5.6 −0.3
Travis Gray	19	22:41	37.8%	16.5	10.4	0.7	1.3	0.7	1.3	3.7	26–58	44.8%	28–78	35.9%	42–55	76.4%	50.0%	55.6%	40.4%	5	26:43 +4:02	66.8%	13.2 +3.8
Michael Cooper	28	14:10	34.8%	13.2	6.6	1.9	1.0	0.6	2.5	4.0	25–58	43.1%†	14–39	35.9%†	39–48	81.3%	47.4%†	55.5%†	49.5%†	5	13:49 −0:21	34.6%	4.4 −0.3
Zavier Fitch	15	22:41	29.9%	10.8	9.3	1.6	0.2	1.6	1.4	4.8	22–47	46.8%†	10–23	43.5%†	18–29	62.1%	52.9%†	55.6%†	41.4%†	4	17:19 −5:23	34.6%	4.3 −1.9
Makhai Anderson	19	8:12	13.7%	11.3	9.5	1.5	0.8	0.5	1.8	6.4	12–27	44.4%†	2–5	40.0%†	14–23	60.9%†	46.9%†	52.2%†	71.9%†	5	9:08 +0:56	22.8%	2.2 −0.1
Elijah Brown	19	5:43	9.5%	9.2	1.8	0.7	0.7	0.0	1.5	7.0	6–13	46.2%†	3–5	60.0%†	4–6	66.7%†	58.3%†	60.6%†	33.3%†	3	2:19 −3:24	3.5%	0.0 −1.3
Huascar CuevasFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	16:27	1.4%	0.0	0.0	2.4	2.4	0.0	7.3	2.4	0–0	—	0–3	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	28 games			68.4	35.0	11.8	not published	2.3	12.1	not published	473–1016	46.6%	210–573	36.6%	373–514	72.6%	49.6%	53.7%	32.3%
Sum of players				66.5	30.6	11.5	5.0	2.2	11.5	18.1	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				+1.9	+4.4	+0.2	not published	+0.1	+0.6	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Wagner College (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,020,071	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$2,020,071
Athletics department expenses	$21,416,316
Athletics department revenue	$21,416,316

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 28 games, 1,860 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1140 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	68.4	71.4
Field goals made	24.0	24.3
Field goals attempted	55.8	54.9
3-pointers made	7.4	6.7
3-pointers attempted	20.1	19.6
Free throws made	13.1	16.1
Free throws attempted	18.0	22.4
Offensive rebounds	11.2	10.0
Defensive rebounds	23.8	23.1
Total rebounds	35.0	33.0
Assists	11.8	13.1
Blocks	2.3	3.7
Turnovers	12.1	9.8
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 143.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 517.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

28 of 28 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Residual shown	1,949	1,894	+55	±9.7	0
Field goals made	Residual shown	683	663	+20	±3.4	0
Field goals attempted	Residual shown	1,589	1,549	+40	±7.9	0
3-pointers made	Residual shown	210	203	+7	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Residual shown	573	558	+15	±2.9	0
Free throws made	Residual shown	373	365	+8	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Residual shown	514	506	+8	±2.6	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	997	872	+125	±79.8	0
Assists	Residual shown	335	329	+6	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	65	63	+2	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	345	327	+18	±10.3	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	143	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	517	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Residual shown	5,700	5,548	+152.3	±114.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Nick Jones	81.5%	+0.1range -0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
John Awoke	60.2%	+0.5range -0.5 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Binael Basil	59.0%	-0.8range -1.8 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Eddie Placer	58.6%	-0.7range -1.7 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Bryan Akanmu	54.5%	+0.3range -0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Jaden Baker	54.4%	-1.0range -1.5 to -0.4Sufficient evidence
Travis Gray	48.8%	+0.1range -0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Michael Cooper	37.6%	+0.4range -0.3 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Zavier Fitch	21.9%	+1.1range +0.5 to +1.5Limited evidence
Makhai Anderson	12.7%	+0.2range -0.9 to +1.0Limited evidence
Elijah Brown	8.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Huascar Cuevas	2.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.2range +8.3 to +10.0Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 97.8% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 6.9%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value