Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Morehead St.

OVC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 254 · Raw net -5.3 · Tempo 66.8 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

All seasons
Record
17–13
17 wins
AdjNet
-7.4β
rank 270 of 365
AdjO
106.8β
rank 207 of 365
AdjD
114.2β
rank 312 of 365
AdjT
66.6β
SOS
-3.7β
rank 283 of 363
NCSOS
6.3β
WAB
-7.3β
rank 164 of 363
RR
4.2β
Exp. W
12.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.106.8209112.1273108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%49.228450.210851.4
TO / 100 poss.18.027315.425816.7
Offensive rebound %35.82735.835030.6
FTA / FGA %37.710835.620135.0
Shooting
3P%32.028134.522133.9
2P%49.726849.16751.7
FT%74.112671.210972.5
Style
3PA / FGA %30.539.039.5
Assists / FGM %47.454.852.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %8.49.29.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %23.232.231.4
2-pointers %54.747.748.8
Free throws %22.120.219.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.9
Top Three Share of Minutes
42%
Bench Share of Minutes
33%
Players with Logged Minutes
12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-07Wake ForestL 65–8179.7Away0–1
11-09GeorgiaL 81–12079.9Away0–2
11-11ClemsonL 56–8359.9Away0–3
11-21ETSUL 62–7765.0Away0–4
11-22ULMW 83–8070.9Neutral1–4
11-29IU IndyL 80–8581.7Away1–5
12-02Murray St.L 52–8467.3Away1–6
12-06PresbyterianL 72–8067.7Away1–7
12-16Little RockW 78–6474.4Home2–7
12-20Southern Ind.W 64–60 1OT63.5Away3–7
01-01LindenwoodL 64–7769.3Away3–8
01-03SIUEW 73–7263.5Away4–8
01-08UT MartinL 68–7661.9Home4–9
01-10Southeast Mo. St.W 71–6960.3Home5–9
01-15Tennessee St.L 100–105 1OT77.8Away5–10
01-17Tennessee TechW 76–7063.5Away6–10
01-22Western Ill.W 71–6664.3Home7–10
01-24Eastern Ill.W 73–6862.4Home8–10
01-29SIUEW 67–6564.6Home9–10
01-31LindenwoodL 78–7972.5Home9–11
02-05Southeast Mo. St.L 70–8270.1Away9–12
02-07UT MartinW 61–5560.2Away10–12
02-12Tennessee TechW 73–6662.3Home11–12
02-14Tennessee St.W 94–8669.2Home12–12
02-19Eastern Ill.W 73–7066.3Away13–12
02-21Western Ill.W 81–5963.5Away14–12
02-24Southern Ind.W 64–6360.5Home15–12
02-26Little RockW 76–7064.5Away16–12
03-06Southeast Mo. St.W 66–6164.6Neutral17–12
03-07Tennessee St.L 67–9369.8Neutral17–13

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 29 of 30 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groupsMinutesPer 40 MinutesShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
George Marshall2931:3275.6%18.55.72.31.60.42.23.463–13845.7%57–15636.5%127–15283.6%50.5%58.7%51.7%533:42 +2:1184.3%18.2 +3.6
Davion Cunningham2827:1162.9%16.35.92.51.30.42.82.991–20644.2%16–5529.1%81–11173.0%44.1%50.2%42.5%523:48 −3:2259.5%6.4 −4.7
Chase Dawson2925:5762.2%12.12.14.01.10.02.21.950–11942.0%23–7729.9%58–7280.6%43.1%49.9%36.7%528:42 +2:4571.8%5.6 −2.2
Anouar Mellouk2925:1860.6%12.46.91.10.91.22.14.089–16553.9%6–2920.7%†32–5459.3%50.5%52.4%27.8%531:09 +5:5177.9%12.4 +4.5
Jon Carroll2925:0360.0%17.112.61.01.30.82.05.1114–20057.0%0–10.0%†83–11472.8%56.7%61.9%56.7%529:01 +3:5972.6%13.6 +2.9
Josiah LeGree2916:4840.3%16.03.96.51.80.24.44.843–9346.2%24–7034.3%37–4484.1%48.5%53.5%27.0%511:42 −5:0629.2%3.6 −3.1
Vince Dawson III2915:3637.4%8.25.41.10.50.10.71.59–2339.1%†24–6735.8%3–475.0%†50.0%†50.7%†4.4%†512:50 −2:4632.1%1.2 −2.0
Tamaury Releford2913:4132.8%15.110.10.41.02.12.25.468–10664.2%0–0—14–2263.6%†64.2%64.8%20.8%510:29 −3:1226.2%5.8 +0.6
Tyonne Farrell2513:1427.3%11.06.42.71.30.72.73.031–6051.7%†4–1428.6%†17–3450.0%50.0%†51.1%†45.9%†59:46 −3:2824.4%2.8 −0.8
Clayton Parker1715:4522.1%6.46.02.11.00.01.33.612–3534.3%†4–2913.8%†7–977.8%†28.1%†31.6%†14.1%†58:05 −7:4020.2%1.2 −1.3
Jacob WilsonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes24:500.8%0.00.00.00.00.08.38.30–10.0%†0–40.0%†0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†————
Jace WinklemanFew gamesUnder 100 minutes31:230.3%28.90.00.00.00.00.00.00–0—1–250.0%†0–0—75.0%†75.0%†0.0%†11:08 −0:150.6%0.0 −1.0
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes29 games71.035.011.8not published2.912.1not published570–114649.7%159–50431.5%459–61674.5%49.0%54.0%37.3%
Sum of players71.032.111.86.12.911.617.6Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+2.80.0not published+0.0+0.5not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$175K
80% Range $63K to $475K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$160K to $215K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
12
2 floor only

The widest scenario range, $81K to $575K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
George Marshall78.0%$15K$1K to $56K12.2%$14K to $18K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chase Dawson64.1%$9K$1K to $40K8.1%$8K to $11K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Davion Cunningham63.8%$7K$1K to $36K6.5%$7K to $9K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Anouar Mellouk63.7%$8K$1K to $37K7.6%$7K to $10K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jon Carroll62.3%$14K$2K to $50K11.3%$13K to $18K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Josiah LeGree42.3%$18K$5K to $60K10.2%$17K to $23K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Vince Dawson III40.2%$14K$3K to $47K8.9%$13K to $18K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tamaury Releford33.9%$34K$9K to $135K16.7%$31K to $42K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tyonne Farrell28.0%$15K$4K to $47K7.8%$14K to $19K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Clayton Parker22.1%$3K$1K to $13K2.3%$3K to $4K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jacob Wilson1.0%$1K$0 to $4K0.8%$1K to $2K$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jace Winkleman0.4%$1K$0 to $4K0.8%$1K to $2K$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$175K$63K to $475K100%$160K to $215K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Morehead State University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$1,888,515
Men's basketball expenses$1,967,263
Athletics department expenses$11,260,314
Athletics department revenue$11,260,314

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 30 games, 2,021 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1210 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points71.474.9
Field goals made25.025.9
Field goals attempted56.559.6
3-pointers made5.58.0
3-pointers attempted17.323.3
Free throws made15.815.1
Free throws attempted21.321.2
Offensive rebounds12.112.9
Defensive rebounds23.221.8
Total rebounds35.334.7
Assists11.914.2
Blocks3.03.6
Turnovers12.010.3
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 178.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 515.
Minutes (derived)200.0not published

29 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,0762,0760±10.483
Field goals madeReconciled7297290±3.628
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,6501,6500±8.360
3-pointers madeReconciled1591590±2.08
3-pointers attemptedReconciled5045040±2.518
Free throws madeReconciled4594590±2.319
Free throws attemptedReconciled6166160±3.129
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown1,023940+83±81.845
AssistsReconciled3463460±2.013
BlocksReconciled8685+1±2.06
TurnoversResidual shown353338+15±10.611
StealsNo team figurenot published178not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published515not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled5,8505,836+13.9±117.0200

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
George Marshall78.0%-0.9range -2.2 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Chase Dawson64.1%-1.2range -2.8 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Davion Cunningham63.8%-1.6range -3.2 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Anouar Mellouk63.7%-1.3range -2.3 to -0.4Sufficient evidence
Jon Carroll62.3%-0.5range -1.3 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Josiah LeGree42.3%+0.5range -0.5 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Vince Dawson III40.2%+0.2range -0.8 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Tamaury Releford33.9%+2.5range +1.6 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Tyonne Farrell28.0%+1.0range +0.2 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Clayton Parker22.1%-1.9range -3.0 to -0.9Sufficient evidence
Jacob Wilson1.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jace Winkleman0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+8.9range +8.0 to +9.7Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 99.7% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value