Morehead St
2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Marshall | 78.0% | -0.9range -2.2 to +0.4Sufficient evidence | +4.1range +3.5 to +4.7Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Chase Dawson | 64.1% | -1.2range -2.8 to +0.1Sufficient evidence | +3.3range +2.6 to +3.9Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Davion Cunningham | 63.8% | -1.6range -3.2 to -0.3Sufficient evidence | +3.1range +2.5 to +3.7Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Anouar Mellouk | 63.7% | -1.3range -2.3 to -0.4Sufficient evidence | +3.2range +2.8 to +3.7Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Jon Carroll | 62.3% | -0.5range -1.3 to +0.5Sufficient evidence | +3.5range +3.1 to +3.9Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Josiah LeGree | 42.3% | +0.5range -0.5 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | +2.7range +2.4 to +3.0Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Vince Dawson III | 40.2% | +0.2range -0.8 to +1.3Sufficient evidence | +2.5range +2.1 to +2.8Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Tamaury Releford | 33.9% | +2.5range +1.6 to +3.3Sufficient evidence | +2.6range +2.3 to +2.8Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Tyonne Farrell | 28.0% | +1.0range +0.2 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | +1.9range +1.7 to +2.0Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Clayton Parker | 22.1% | -1.9range -3.0 to -0.9Sufficient evidence | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidence | Loading | Loading |
| Jacob Wilson | 1.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | Loading | Loading |
| Jace Winkleman | 0.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | Loading | Loading |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β
School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)
Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.
Coverage and exclusions
27 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (90%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 3 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses
| Reported revenue | $1,888,515 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $1,967,263 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 2 |
| 2 days | 11 |
| 3 or more days | 16 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 4 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 4 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology