Southern Utah

WAC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 329 · Raw net -12.6 · Tempo 70.9 · 29 Division I games · Through 2026-03-12

Record: 7–22; 7 wins
AdjNet: -9.3β; rank 296 of 365
AdjO: 104.7β; rank 254 of 365
AdjD: 114.0β; rank 308 of 365
AdjT: 70.8β
SOS: 1.7β; rank 118 of 363
NCSOS: 5.2β
WAB: -15.0β; rank 315 of 363
RR: -0.4β
Exp. W: 7.4β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	101.6309	114.2309	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	50.7199	53.2276	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	20.3352	14.8303	16.7
Offensive rebound %	28.8239	33.6309	30.6
FTA / FGA %	33.1236	29.856	35.0
Shooting
3P%	33.0232	38.0357	33.9
2P%	51.4195	51.7173	51.7
FT%	71.5221	70.988	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	35.5	29.5	39.5
Assists / FGM %	49.5	47.0	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.2	10.2	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	28.0	26.3	31.4
2-pointers %	53.0	57.1	48.8
Free throws %	18.9	16.5	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.9
Top Three Share of Minutes: 44%
Bench Share of Minutes: 31%
Players with Logged Minutes: 15

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-04	Arizona St.	L 64–81	72.7	Away	0–1
11-08	UTRGV	L 72–95	73.2	Home	0–2
11-15	Omaha	L 85–90	74.5	Away	0–3
11-17	Gonzaga	L 50–122	81.8	Away	0–4
11-19	Washington St.	L 74–98	72.1	Away	0–5
11-28	Robert Morris	L 54–61	64.7	Away	0–6
11-29	Stetson	W 70–68	69.4	Neutral	1–6
12-06	Oregon St.	L 70–81	70.3	Away	1–7
12-13	Washington	L 69–105	71.3	Away	1–8
12-18	Northern Ariz.	L 57–65	64.9	Away	1–9
12-29	Utah Tech	L 66–80	72.1	Away	1–10
01-03	UT Arlington	L 77–86	72.9	Home	1–11
01-08	Utah Valley	L 72–89	72.8	Away	1–12
01-10	California Baptist	L 55–58	60.9	Away	1–13
01-15	Tarleton St.	W 106–105 1OT	90.6	Home	2–13
01-17	Abilene Christian	W 74–52	71.3	Home	3–13
01-21	Utah Valley	W 84–70	70.8	Home	4–13
01-24	Utah Tech	L 91–102	72.4	Away	4–14
01-29	UT Arlington	L 61–80	70.4	Away	4–15
01-31	Abilene Christian	W 79–76	68.3	Away	5–15
02-07	Tarleton St.	L 59–62	68.8	Home	5–16
02-12	California Baptist	L 66–83	67.7	Home	5–17
02-14	UT Arlington	W 78–73	69.8	Away	6–17
02-19	Tarleton St.	L 74–78	67.0	Away	6–18
02-21	Abilene Christian	L 83–87	75.1	Away	6–19
02-28	Utah Tech	W 81–67	66.3	Home	7–19
03-05	Utah Valley	L 88–92	71.3	Home	7–20
03-07	California Baptist	L 75–82	69.9	Home	7–21
03-12	UT Arlington	L 63–69	71.3	Neutral	7–22

Roster · 15 players

Player logs in 29 of 29 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Jaiden Feroah	29	31:03	77.3%	406	200	53	25	48	64	80	109–177	61.6%	37–89	41.6%	77–89	86.5%	61.8%	66.5%	33.5%	5	35:34 +4:31	88.9%	15.0 +1.0
Tanner Hayhurst	28	30:47	74.0%	280	92	40	18	0	27	49	53–102	52.0%	43–99	43.4%	45–52	86.5%	58.5%	62.5%	25.9%	4	33:03 +2:16	66.1%	12.8 +2.8
Elijah Duval	29	26:55	67.0%	451	117	102	34	7	109	91	140–274	51.1%	29–93	31.2%	84–135	62.2%	50.0%	52.9%	36.8%	5	26:46 −0:09	66.9%	20.2 +4.6
Isaiah Cottrell	29	26:25	65.8%	253	166	39	16	40	43	51	80–169	47.3%	11–52	21.2%	60–87	69.0%	43.7%	48.8%	39.4%	5	26:03 −0:22	65.1%	6.6 −2.1
Dylan Jones	27	25:15	58.5%	187	52	22	12	2	25	29	26–46	56.5%	41–119	34.5%	12–15	80.0%†	53.0%	54.5%	9.1%	5	17:37 −7:38	44.0%	3.0 −3.9
Cale Barclay	28	15:40	37.7%	126	76	25	7	2	31	65	39–68	57.4%	5–34	14.7%†	33–49	67.3%	45.6%	51.0%	48.0%	5	15:04 −0:36	37.7%	5.4 +0.9
Kai Burdick	29	13:28	33.5%	102	90	19	5	18	25	31	46–73	63.0%†	1–3	33.3%†	7–18	38.9%†	62.5%†	60.8%†	23.7%†	5	29:05 +15:37	72.7%	10.4 +6.9
Lorenzo Abellar	28	11:00	26.4%	77	19	31	9	1	21	29	15–50	30.0%†	6–18	33.3%†	29–36	80.6%	35.3%†	45.9%†	52.9%†	5	5:13 −5:47	13.1%	1.2 −1.6
Jalen Lee	21	13:52	25.0%	91	27	5	10	1	11	26	17–43	39.5%†	14–46	30.4%†	15–19	78.9%†	42.7%†	46.7%†	21.3%†	—	—	—	—
Zach BellFew games	8	21:49	15.0%	59	14	13	6	1	26	10	19–41	46.3%†	4–17	23.5%†	9–12	75.0%†	43.1%†	46.6%†	20.7%†	—	—	—	—
Logan Stephens	17	8:31	12.4%	56	21	16	10	0	21	12	9–29	31.0%†	4–20	20.0%†	26–38	68.4%	30.6%†	42.6%†	77.6%†	5	16:13 +7:42	40.6%	6.0 +2.7
Brayden JohnsonUnder 100 minutes	10	3:00	2.6%	0	2	7	0	0	2	1	0–3	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–2	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	66.7%†	3	2:55 −0:04	4.4%	0.0 0.0
Zeplin KiddUnder 100 minutes	10	2:07	1.8%	2	6	1	0	0	1	2	1–2	50.0%†	0–0	—	0–3	0.0%†	50.0%†	30.1%†	150.0%†	—	—	—	—
Chuks IsituaFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	2:30	1.1%	0	2	0	0	0	0	4	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:20 −2:10	0.2%	0.0 0.0
Langston BinnsFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	2:02	0.9%	7	0	0	0	0	1	1	2–3	66.7%†	1–4	25.0%†	0–0	—	50.0%†	50.0%†	0.0%†	2	0:06 −1:56	0.1%	0.0 −1.4
Team, games with logs · season totals	29 games			2097	988	372	not published	120	419	not published	556–1081	51.4%	196–594	33.0%	397–555	71.5%	50.7%	54.6%	33.1%
Sum of players				2097	884	373	152	120	407	481	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+104	−1	not published	0	+12	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $205K; 80% Range $76K to $540K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $200K to $210K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 15; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Jaiden Feroah	76.4%	$60K	$18K to $195K	25.2%	$59K to $61K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tanner Hayhurst	74.0%	$48K	$12K to $155K	21.2%	$47K to $49K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Elijah Duval	67.7%	$9K	$1K to $45K	7.3%	$9K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Cottrell	65.1%	$13K	$1K to $55K	9.9%	$13K to $14K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dylan Jones	58.1%	$5K	$1K to $33K	3.5%	$5K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Cale Barclay	37.1%	$6K	$1K to $26K	4.6%	$6K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kai Burdick	36.2%	$9K	$1K to $35K	5.9%	$8K to $9K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Lorenzo Abellar	27.2%	$3K	$1K to $15K	1.1%	$3K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jalen Lee	24.0%	$3K	$1K to $16K	2.1%	$3K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Zach Bell	14.9%	$2K	$1K to $7K	0.9%	$2K in all four	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Logan Stephens	13.1%	$4K	$1K to $14K	2.7%	$4K in all four	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Brayden Johnson	2.6%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.7%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Zeplin Kidd	2.0%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.7%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Chuks Isitua	1.0%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.7%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Langston Binns	0.7%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.7%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$205K	$76K to $540K	100%	$200K to $210K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Southern Utah University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,674,288
Men's basketball expenses	$1,812,262
Athletics department expenses	$19,562,340
Athletics department revenue	$19,562,340

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 29 games, 2,064 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,097	2,357
Field goals made	752	880
Field goals attempted	1,675	1,847
3-pointers made	196	207
3-pointers attempted	594	545
Free throws made	397	390
Free throws attempted	555	550
Offensive rebounds	290	353
Defensive rebounds	698	718
Total rebounds	988	1,071
Assists	372	414
Blocks	120	110
Turnovers	419	306
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 152.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 481.
Minutes (derived)	5,825	not published

29 of 29 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,097	2,097	0	±10.5	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	752	752	0	±3.8	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,675	1,675	0	±8.4	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	196	196	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	594	594	0	±3.0	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	397	397	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	555	555	0	±2.8	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	988	884	+104	±79.0	0
Assists	Reconciled	372	373	−1	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	120	120	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Reconciled	419	407	+12	±12.6	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	152	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	481	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,825	5,812	+12.7	±116.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Jaiden Feroah	76.4%	+1.3range +0.0 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Tanner Hayhurst	74.0%	+1.0range -0.6 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Elijah Duval	67.7%	-1.8range -3.0 to -0.6Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Cottrell	65.1%	-1.3range -2.5 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Dylan Jones	58.1%	-2.6range -4.1 to -1.0Sufficient evidence
Cale Barclay	37.1%	-1.6range -2.4 to -0.7Sufficient evidence
Kai Burdick	36.2%	-0.9range -2.7 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Lorenzo Abellar	27.2%	-2.6range -3.7 to -1.7Sufficient evidence
Jalen Lee	24.0%	-2.7range -4.2 to -0.9Sufficient evidence
Zach Bell	14.9%	-4.8range -6.1 to -3.6Limited evidence
Logan Stephens	13.1%	-0.7range -1.5 to -0.0Limited evidence
Brayden Johnson	2.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Zeplin Kidd	2.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Chuks Isitua	1.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Langston Binns	0.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +8.4range +7.5 to +9.2Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 98.8% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 5.6%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value