Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Chicago St.

NEC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 347 · Raw net -17.2 · Tempo 65.8 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-04

All seasons
Record
6–25
6 wins
AdjNet
-15.7β
rank 342 of 365
AdjO
100.5β
rank 326 of 365
AdjD
116.2β
rank 337 of 365
AdjT
66.8β
SOS
-1.7β
rank 217 of 363
NCSOS
10.0β
WAB
-18.1β
rank 349 of 363
RR
-1.2β
Exp. W
7.2β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.98.7338115.9335108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%45.335856.735451.4
TO / 100 poss.15.611420.12016.7
Offensive rebound %28.325435.033930.6
FTA / FGA %30.031038.026235.0
Shooting
3P%32.127535.629033.9
2P%44.035960.036451.7
FT%75.08475.131472.5
Style
3PA / FGA %30.950.839.5
Assists / FGM %50.372.752.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %5.08.89.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %26.338.331.4
2-pointers %53.941.648.8
Free throws %19.920.119.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
10.2
Top Three Share of Minutes
41%
Bench Share of Minutes
40%
Players with Logged Minutes
15

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03DePaulL 62–9272.8Away0–1
11-06Saint LouisL 86–10885.7Away0–2
11-11ButlerL 66–9873.2Away0–3
11-15UICL 63–6763.5Home0–4
11-18MinnesotaL 54–6662.8Away0–5
11-20IowaL 54–9361.1Away0–6
11-25Purdue Fort WayneL 77–9068.1Away0–7
11-28Youngstown St.L 64–8770.4Away0–8
12-06Illinois St.L 53–9567.1Away0–9
12-14Loyola ChicagoW 84–7572.1Away1–9
12-16Bowling GreenL 55–7667.2Away1–10
12-20IndianaL 58–7868.7Away1–11
01-02WagnerL 72–7964.0Home1–12
01-04LIUL 55–7464.7Home1–13
01-08FDUL 63–7066.1Away1–14
01-10StonehillL 82–85 1OT73.5Away1–15
01-17Le MoyneL 57–7268.9Home1–16
01-19New HavenL 56–6258.7Home1–17
01-23Saint FrancisL 60–8166.9Away1–18
01-25MercyhurstL 59–6157.8Away1–19
01-31MercyhurstW 78–7466.5Home2–19
02-05Central Conn. St.L 67–7862.3Away2–20
02-07New HavenW 63–5758.9Away3–20
02-09Saint FrancisW 80–7571.0Home4–20
02-12StonehillW 68–5556.0Home5–20
02-14Le MoyneL 63–8168.9Away5–21
02-19FDUL 59–6052.9Home5–22
02-21Central Conn. St.W 70–5161.9Home6–22
02-26LIUL 56–7365.3Away6–23
02-28WagnerL 61–8068.9Away6–24
03-04LIUL 75–7961.4Away6–25

Roster · 15 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groupsMinutesSeason TotalsShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
CJ Ray3131:0677.4%421140472734081115–26044.2%41–11037.3%68–7887.2%47.7%52.1%21.1%532:36 +1:3081.5%12.4 −1.2
Marcus Tankersley2930:3971.4%37291722015845134–28946.4%7–2924.1%†83–12566.4%45.4%49.9%39.3%528:34 −2:0671.4%10.8 −2.0
Braelon Bush2625:4853.9%2205081330363251–10349.5%28–10127.7%34–3791.9%45.6%49.9%18.1%528:55 +3:0772.3%6.2 −2.3
Doyel Cockrill III2724:2252.8%3096954260283036–9338.7%54–15235.5%75–9083.3%47.8%54.3%36.7%529:19 +4:5773.3%13.0 +1.6
Corey Sands2917:3440.9%855618130123713–3240.6%†16–6026.7%11–1573.3%†40.2%†43.1%†16.3%†512:16 −5:1830.7%1.2 −1.7
Stephen Byard2222:2339.6%216106171716306077–16347.2%5–1241.7%†47–6473.4%48.3%53.2%36.6%526:36 +4:1366.5%15.2 +5.4
Malek Robinson3115:2138.2%904927541257318–5433.3%†6–2030.0%†36–5072.0%36.5%†46.9%†67.6%†511:34 −3:4728.9%1.8 −1.1
Dailliss Cox3114:5637.2%9792671127440–8348.2%†3–933.3%†8–1080.0%†48.4%†50.3%†10.9%†56:44 −8:1216.8%1.6 −1.5
Joseph Owens2511:1022.4%544961014145722–3956.4%†0–0—10–1662.5%†56.4%†58.6%†41.0%†58:48 −2:2122.0%1.2 −1.0
Lionel Larvadain2011:0417.8%572213162203117–5133.3%†3–1323.1%†14–1973.7%†33.6%†39.4%†29.7%†25:56 −5:095.9%1.5 −1.4
Daniel Zatsepin287:3617.1%233621506368–2532.0%†1–250.0%†4–850.0%†35.2%†37.7%†29.6%†56:41 −0:5516.7%0.0 −0.8
Chauncey Gibson1414:4516.6%6231167211810–3231.3%†13–4330.2%†3–1030.0%†39.3%†39.0%†13.3%†28:10 −6:368.2%0.5 −3.9
Dakari ThomasUnder 100 minutes204:116.7%9101601102–633.3%†0–0—5–955.6%†33.3%†45.2%†150.0%†17:43 +3:323.9%0.0 −0.5
CJ DelancyFew gamesUnder 100 minutes57:263.0%22110171–250.0%†0–0—0–0—50.0%†50.0%†0.0%†————
Deshawn Jean-CharlesFew gamesUnder 100 minutes48:402.8%35210050–30.0%†0–0—3–475.0%†0.0%†31.5%†133.3%†————
Team, games with logs · season totals31 games2020939363not published41320not published544–123544.0%177–55132.1%401–53575.0%45.3%50.0%30.0%
Sum of players202080836325340294586Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0+1310not published+1+26not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$0 (assumed opted out)
80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier
Low and other
low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Chicago State University (NCAA Division I without football)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$1,355,956Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$1,355,956
Athletics department expenses$8,751,784
Athletics department revenue$8,751,784

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 31 games, 2,047 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points2,0202,372
Field goals made721796
Field goals attempted1,7861,672
3-pointers made177303
3-pointers attempted551850
Free throws made401477
Free throws attempted535635
Offensive rebounds315336
Defensive rebounds624800
Total rebounds9391,136
Assists363579
Blocks41109
Turnovers320411
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 253.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 586.
Minutes (derived)6,225not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,0202,0200±10.10
Field goals madeReconciled7217210±3.60
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,7861,7860±8.90
3-pointers madeReconciled1771770±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled5515510±2.80
Free throws madeReconciled4014010±2.00
Free throws attemptedReconciled5355350±2.70
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown939808+131±75.10
AssistsReconciled3633630±2.00
BlocksReconciled4140+1±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown320294+26±9.60
StealsNo team figurenot published253not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published586not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,2256,198+27.2±124.50

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
CJ Ray77.5%-0.2range -1.2 to +0.7Sufficient evidence
Marcus Tankersley72.3%-2.9range -4.2 to -1.6Sufficient evidence
Doyel Cockrill III53.6%+0.0range -1.1 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Braelon Bush53.4%-0.3range -1.7 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Stephen Byard42.2%-1.3range -2.4 to -0.0Sufficient evidence
Corey Sands39.3%-2.4range -3.3 to -1.2Sufficient evidence
Malek Robinson38.8%-1.9range -3.3 to -0.4Sufficient evidence
Dailliss Cox38.5%-1.9range -3.2 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Joseph Owens21.3%-1.0range -1.9 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Lionel Larvadain18.6%-1.7range -2.5 to -0.6Sufficient evidence
Daniel Zatsepin16.7%-2.4range -3.6 to -1.1Sufficient evidence
Chauncey Gibson16.1%-0.9range -2.0 to +0.4Limited evidence
Dakari Thomas5.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
CJ Delancy3.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Deshawn Jean-Charles2.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+8.0range +7.2 to +8.9Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

12 valued players hold 97.6% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.4%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 3.2%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value