SIUE

OVC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 131 · Raw net 2.7 · Tempo 65.6 · 29 Division I games · Through 2026-03-04

Record: 16–13; 16 wins
AdjNet: -4.3β; rank 233 of 365
AdjO: 101.1β; rank 320 of 365
AdjD: 105.4β; rank 97 of 365
AdjT: 65.8β
SOS: -7.7β; rank 356 of 363
NCSOS: -5.5β
WAB: -9.4β; rank 212 of 363
RR: -1.6β
Exp. W: 17.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	102.3301	99.624	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	49.5266	45.66	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.9268	17.0148	16.7
Offensive rebound %	30.1196	31.6235	30.6
FTA / FGA %	30.6295	34.3158	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.0123	30.210	33.9
2P%	47.8315	45.811	51.7
FT%	67.1343	70.675	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	36.2	38.4	39.5
Assists / FGM %	50.9	46.4	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	11.5	8.9	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	31.8	30.1	31.4
2-pointers %	51.0	48.9	48.8
Free throws %	17.2	21.0	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 10.2
Top Three Share of Minutes: 39%
Bench Share of Minutes: 40%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-07	UTSA	W 77–60	72.7	Away	1–0
11-10	Indiana St.	L 55–64	71.1	Home	1–1
11-14	Drake	W 61–59	61.0	Away	2–1
11-17	Wisconsin	L 69–94	66.3	Away	2–2
11-21	Air Force	L 63–77	68.5	Away	2–3
11-23	Alabama St.	W 83–68	66.5	Neutral	3–3
12-02	North Florida	W 72–63	65.2	Away	4–3
12-06	Western Mich.	L 73–83	68.1	Home	4–4
12-18	Eastern Ill.	L 72–76 1OT	71.3	Away	4–5
12-22	Western Ill.	W 66–61	70.7	Away	5–5
01-01	Southern Ind.	W 59–55	66.1	Home	6–5
01-03	Morehead St.	L 72–73	63.5	Home	6–6
01-06	Lindenwood	W 66–62	69.8	Home	7–6
01-08	Little Rock	L 70–73	62.7	Home	7–7
01-15	UT Martin	L 59–65	63.5	Away	7–8
01-17	Southeast Mo. St.	W 68–55	63.5	Away	8–8
01-22	Tennessee St.	W 74–66	63.2	Home	9–8
01-24	Tennessee Tech	W 62–58	58.1	Home	10–8
01-29	Morehead St.	L 65–67	64.6	Away	10–9
01-31	Southern Ind.	W 58–46	60.4	Away	11–9
02-03	Lindenwood	W 78–72	73.0	Away	12–9
02-07	Little Rock	W 71–61	67.4	Away	13–9
02-12	Southeast Mo. St.	W 74–56	65.6	Home	14–9
02-14	UT Martin	L 76–81	67.7	Home	14–10
02-19	Tennessee Tech	L 52–62	67.4	Away	14–11
02-21	Tennessee St.	L 53–80	63.7	Away	14–12
02-26	Western Ill.	W 67–47	67.3	Home	15–12
02-28	Eastern Ill.	W 77–50	60.2	Home	16–12
03-04	Eastern Ill.	L 71–77 1OT	69.0	Neutral	16–13

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 29 of 29 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Jack Campion	29	28:52	71.5%	242	110	158	57	2	72	66	53–146	36.3%	25–60	41.7%	61–84	72.6%	43.9%	49.8%	40.8%	5	32:08 +3:16	78.4%	5.2 −3.1
Arnas Sakenis	29	25:54	64.2%	260	148	16	20	70	23	31	104–161	64.6%	0–4	0.0%†	52–89	58.4%	63.0%	63.7%	53.9%	5	30:32 +4:38	74.5%	9.6 +0.6
Jo Valrie	29	23:46	58.9%	176	120	12	25	3	34	64	34–83	41.0%	27–72	37.5%	27–38	71.1%	48.1%	51.2%	24.5%	5	22:04 −1:42	53.8%	5.0 −1.1
Darrion Baker	29	21:02	52.1%	222	117	19	18	9	36	75	46–91	50.5%	33–73	45.2%	31–47	66.0%	58.2%	60.1%	28.7%	5	25:13 +4:11	61.5%	10.0 +2.3
Tyler King	27	21:52	50.5%	272	69	26	18	3	22	46	60–115	52.2%	40–106	37.7%	32–53	60.4%	54.3%	55.7%	24.0%	5	32:12 +10:20	78.6%	13.6 +3.5
Jordan Pickett	28	19:24	46.4%	130	80	31	18	1	26	41	22–68	32.4%	22–77	28.6%	20–27	74.1%	37.9%	41.4%	18.6%	5	15:40 −3:44	38.2%	5.6 +1.0
Kyle Thomas	26	19:15	42.8%	168	99	10	7	20	23	55	52–112	46.4%	11–32	34.4%†	31–38	81.6%	47.6%	52.3%	26.4%	5	17:29 −1:45	42.7%	7.4 +0.9
Ring Malith	11	32:10	30.2%	195	58	18	11	7	24	22	45–84	53.6%	21–58	36.2%	42–57	73.7%	53.9%	58.4%	40.1%	—	—	—	—
CJ Hall	26	12:24	27.6%	109	43	40	11	0	22	28	33–89	37.1%	11–38	28.9%†	10–15	66.7%†	39.0%	40.8%	11.8%	5	14:03 +1:39	34.3%	3.4 −0.8
Myles ThompsonFew games	8	28:46	19.7%	86	49	11	5	1	16	18	29–56	51.8%†	3–14	21.4%†	19–35	54.3%	47.9%†	50.4%†	50.0%†	—	—	—	—
Darius Robinson	19	7:52	12.8%	46	12	7	2	1	10	10	7–17	41.2%†	8–36	22.2%†	8–12	66.7%†	35.8%†	39.5%†	22.6%†	3	7:15 −0:37	10.6%	0.7 −1.8
Corentin Efono	16	8:41	11.9%	10	18	10	3	0	8	13	5–10	50.0%†	0–4	0.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	35.7%†	33.6%†	14.3%†	4	5:51 −2:50	11.4%	1.0 +0.4
Harrison Alexander	15	7:12	9.2%	45	9	3	4	0	6	7	11–15	73.3%†	7–21	33.3%†	2–3	66.7%†	59.7%†	60.3%†	8.3%†	5	4:35 −2:37	11.2%	3.0 0.0
Iwo BagancFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	1:33	0.8%	2	1	0	0	0	0	3	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	2–2	100.0%†	0.0%†	53.2%†	200.0%†	3	1:35 +0:03	2.3%	0.0 −0.3
Team, games with logs · season totals	29 games			1963	1035	361	not published	117	344	not published	501–1048	47.8%	208–595	35.0%	337–502	67.1%	49.5%	52.7%	30.6%
Sum of players				1963	933	361	199	117	322	479	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+102	0	not published	0	+22	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $180K; 80% Range $63K to $480K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $170K to $205K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 1 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Jack Campion	72.2%	$42K	$14K to $130K	21.9%	$40K to $48K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Arnas Sakenis	64.0%	$36K	$11K to $115K	18.6%	$35K to $41K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jo Valrie	58.6%	$16K	$4K to $51K	10.7%	$15K to $18K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Darrion Baker	51.5%	$8K	$1K to $32K	6.4%	$8K to $9K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tyler King	50.2%	$9K	$1K to $34K	7.1%	$9K to $11K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jordan Pickett	47.6%	$4K	$1K to $21K	3.2%	$4K to $5K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kyle Thomas	42.7%	$14K	$3K to $44K	8.7%	$13K to $16K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ring Malith	30.0%	$9K	$2K to $27K	5.8%	$8K to $10K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
CJ Hall	27.3%	$7K	$2K to $24K	5.0%	$7K to $8K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Myles Thompson	21.9%	$5K	$1K to $18K	3.8%	$5K to $6K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Darius Robinson	12.5%	$2K	$1K to $8K	1.3%	$2K in all four	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Corentin Efono	11.4%	$2K	$1K to $7K	1.0%	$2K in all four	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Harrison Alexander	9.4%	$2K	$1K to $7K	1.5%	$2K to $3K	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Iwo Baganc	0.8%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.7%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$180K	$63K to $480K	100%	$170K to $205K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,698,059	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$1,698,059
Athletics department expenses	$12,211,970
Athletics department revenue	$12,211,970

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 29 games, 1,918 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	1,963	1,911
Field goals made	709	659
Field goals attempted	1,643	1,655
3-pointers made	208	192
3-pointers attempted	595	636
Free throws made	337	401
Free throws attempted	502	568
Offensive rebounds	302	339
Defensive rebounds	733	701
Total rebounds	1,035	1,040
Assists	361	306
Blocks	117	93
Turnovers	344	327
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 199.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 479.
Minutes (derived)	5,850	not published

29 of 29 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	1,963	1,963	0	±9.8	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	709	709	0	±3.5	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,643	1,643	0	±8.2	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	208	208	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	595	595	0	±3.0	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	337	337	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	502	502	0	±2.5	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,035	933	+102	±82.8	0
Assists	Reconciled	361	361	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	117	117	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	344	322	+22	±10.3	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	199	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	479	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,850	5,833	+16.8	±117.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Jack Campion	72.2%	+2.5range +1.4 to +3.8Sufficient evidence
Arnas Sakenis	64.0%	+2.4range +1.2 to +4.0Sufficient evidence
Jo Valrie	58.6%	+0.6range -0.5 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Darrion Baker	51.5%	-0.5range -1.7 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Tyler King	50.2%	-0.1range -1.4 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Jordan Pickett	47.6%	-2.0range -3.1 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Kyle Thomas	42.7%	+0.8range -0.4 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Ring Malith	30.0%	+0.5range -0.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
CJ Hall	27.3%	+0.3range -0.9 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Myles Thompson	21.9%	-0.1range -0.9 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Darius Robinson	12.5%	-1.8range -2.7 to -0.8Limited evidence
Corentin Efono	11.4%	-2.5range -3.4 to -1.6Limited evidence
Harrison Alexander	9.4%	-1.1range -1.8 to -0.2Limited evidence
Iwo Baganc	0.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.0range +9.2 to +10.7Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

13 valued players hold 99.8% of on-court time. 1 without a value (under 300 possessions) holds 0.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 6.6%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value