Chisom Okpara
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2135:36 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 94
- Minutes per game
- 22:43
- Points per game
- 10.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.8 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.4 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.4 | 6.6 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 3.4 | 3.7 |
| Season totals | 980 | 353 | 142 | 71 | 39 | 181 | 196 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 330–719 | 45.9% | 7.6 | 13.5 |
| 2P | 264–527 | 50.1% | 5.6 | 9.9 |
| 3P | 66–192 | 34.4% | 2.0 | 3.6 |
| FT | 254–370 | 68.6% | 3.9 | 6.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.5% | 55.6% | 26.7% | 51.5% | 0.78 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Chisom Okpara | Harvard | 24 | 20:09 | 7.4 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 14.6 | 29.4%† | 58.5% | 54.9% |
| 2024 Chisom Okpara | Harvard | 22 | 30:37 | 16.8 | 5.4 | 2.1 | 22.0 | 34.8% | 69.7% | 57.0% |
| 2025 Chisom Okpara | Stanford | 31 | 15:54 | 6.3 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 15.9 | 44.4%† | 66.7% | 56.8% |
| 2026 Chisom Okpara | Stanford | 17 | 28:32 | 13.9 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 19.5 | 30.4% | 73.0% | 53.0% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Stanford · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $175K
- 80% range $39K to $295K
- Median share of team pool
- 5.3%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $175K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 38.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Stanford: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Stanford | $175Kspeculative | $39K to $295K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.3 | -0.8 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | -0.1 | +2.7range +2.3 to +3.0 | 1,602 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Stanford | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.1 | -1.0 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | -0.5 | +1.9range +1.5 to +2.3 | 1,503 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Harvard | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -0.7 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -0.5 | +2.6range +2.1 to +3.1 | 2,321 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Harvard | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.8 | -1.6 to +0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -0.3 | +1.6range +1.3 to +2.0 | 1,661 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology