Tyler Shirley
Florida A&M · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
880:21 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 30:21
- Points per game
- 12.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.8 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.2 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 2.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.1 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 3.6 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 355 | 140 | 55 | 31 | 12 | 79 | 83 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 135–307 | 44.0% | 10.6 | 13.9 |
| 2P | 108–222 | 48.6% | 7.7 | 10.1 |
| 3P | 27–85 | 31.8% | 2.9 | 3.9 |
| FT | 58–74 | 78.4% | 2.6 | 3.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.4% | 52.3% | 27.7% | 24.1% | 0.70 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Florida A&M · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $6K
- 80% range $1K to $38K
- Median share of team pool
- 6.2%
- team pool $175K, 80% range $64K to $470K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $6K to $7K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 75.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Florida A&M: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Florida A&M | $6Kspeculative | $1K to $38K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -2.3 | -3.6 to -0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -1.4 | -1.0 | +3.3range +2.6 to +4.1 | 3,100 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Florida A&M | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.3 | -3.7 to -1.2 | Limited evidence | -1.1 | -1.2 | +0.3range +0.2 to +0.4 | 328 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:25 | 30:21 | 17:01–38:44 | |
| Points | 15.8 | 12.2 | 0.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 54.9% | 46.9% | 0.0%–92.9% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Southern U. | L 70–73 | 33:25 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-12 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 58.3% |
| 2026-03-11 | Jackson St. | W 70–60 | 28:33 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 6-12 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-05 | Bethune-Cookman | W 81–77 | 33:58 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-11 | 0-2 | 7-8 | 45.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | Grambling | W 66–59 | 32:53 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-26 | Southern U. | W 82–71 | 28:17 | 25 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9-12 | 3-4 | 4-5 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Alabama St. | W 76–63 | 25:33 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5-13 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 38.5% |
| 2026-02-19 | Alabama A&M | L 61–63 | 35:36 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 9-15 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 76.7% |
| 2026-02-16 | Alcorn | W 86–78 | 31:28 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-11 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Jackson St. | L 60–80 | 28:42 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-09 | Prairie View | W 100–96 | 23:26 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | Texas Southern | L 57–62 | 20:55 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-9 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 11.1% |
| 2026-02-02 | Alabama St. | L 66–79 | 34:38 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8-16 | 2-3 | 4-6 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Alabama A&M | L 65–72 | 31:45 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 4-12 | 0-0 | 8-8 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-26 | Jackson St. | L 65–66 | 26:38 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Alcorn | W 66–58 | 33:12 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 3-5 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-19 | Mississippi Val. | W 62–48 | 27:11 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-17 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 71–67 | 37:03 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-12 | Grambling | W 91–84 | 32:49 | 14 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Southern U. | W 67–59 | 26:39 | 17 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5-10 | 1-4 | 6-6 | 55.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Bethune-Cookman | L 83–87 | 31:40 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5-7 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 92.9% |
| 2025-12-28 | Georgia Tech | L 65–89 | 26:31 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2-11 | 2-8 | 1-2 | 27.3% |
| 2025-12-21 | TCU | L 56–80 | 34:51 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-14 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 46.4% |
| 2025-12-19 | Tarleton St. | L 54–78 | 17:01 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Jacksonville | W 72–65 | 32:14 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-13 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 57.7% |
| 2025-12-02 | Jacksonville | L 82–85 | 38:44 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7-16 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2025-11-17 | Georgia | L 57–87 | 34:40 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-15 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 43.3% |
| 2025-11-11 | UCF | L 60–97 | 24:29 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-08 | Kennesaw St. | L 72–92 | 34:47 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-10 | 3-6 | 3-3 | 55.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | South Fla. | L 67–102 | 32:43 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5-11 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 50.0% |