Tyler Shirley
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1164:13 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 58
- Minutes per game
- 20:04
- Points per game
- 7.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.4 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.3 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.5 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 3.4 | 4.0 |
| Season totals | 422 | 196 | 64 | 39 | 13 | 99 | 117 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 160–364 | 44.0% | 6.3 | 12.5 |
| 2P | 124–249 | 49.8% | 4.3 | 8.6 |
| 3P | 36–115 | 31.3% | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| FT | 66–84 | 78.6% | 1.4 | 2.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.9% | 52.6% | 31.6% | 23.1% | 0.65 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Tyler Shirley | South Alabama | 9Few games | 11:50 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 12.8 | 35.3%† | 100.0%† | 66.0%† |
| 2023 Tyler Shirley | South Alabama | 16Under 100 minutes | 5:32 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 5.4 | 25.0%† | 100.0%† | 52.4%† |
| 2025 Tyler Shirley | Florida A&M | 4Few games | 22:13 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 9.5 | 22.2%† | 60.0%† | 43.4%† |
| 2026 Tyler Shirley | Florida A&M | 29 | 30:21 | 12.2 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 16.1 | 31.8% | 78.4% | 52.3% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Florida A&M · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $6K
- 80% range $1K to $38K
- Median share of team pool
- 6.2%
- team pool $175K, 80% range $64K to $470K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $6K to $7K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 75.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Florida A&M: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Florida A&M | $6Kspeculative | $1K to $38K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -2.3 | -3.6 to -0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -1.4 | -1.0 | +3.3range +2.6 to +4.1 | 3,100 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Florida A&M | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.3 | -3.7 to -1.2 | Limited evidence | -1.1 | -1.2 | +0.3range +0.2 to +0.4 | 328 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2023 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2022 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology