Maliq Brown
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2520:21 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 117
- Minutes per game
- 21:32
- Points per game
- 5.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.2 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.7 | 5.2 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.7 | 9.6 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| Season totals | 672 | 603 | 180 | 192 | 73 | 128 | 255 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 291–432 | 67.4% | 3.7 | 6.9 |
| 2P | 276–373 | 74.0% | 3.2 | 5.9 |
| 3P | 15–59 | 25.4% | 0.5 | 0.9 |
| FT | 75–131 | 57.3% | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69.1% | 68.6% | 13.7% | 30.3% | 1.41 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Maliq Brown | Syracuse | 27 | 20:27 | 5.8 | 4.7 | 0.9 | 11.3 | — | 53.8% | 68.8% |
| 2024 Maliq Brown | Syracuse | 27 | 30:00 | 9.8 | 6.9 | 2.0 | 13.0 | 35.3%† | 69.1% | 72.8% |
| 2025 Maliq Brown | Duke | 25 | 15:45 | 2.6 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 6.5 | 33.3%† | 37.5%† | 66.6%† |
| 2026 Maliq Brown | Duke | 38 | 20:07 | 4.9 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 9.8 | 16.7%† | 50.0% | 64.0% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Duke · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $240K
- 80% range $110K to $375K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $240K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $29K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 50.3%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Duke: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Duke | $240Kspeculative | $110K to $375K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.5 | +2.2 to +4.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | +2.3 | +3.4range +3.0 to +3.8 | 2,488 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Duke | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +4.3 | +2.7 to +5.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | +3.1 | +1.2range +1.0 to +1.4 | 1,315 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Syracuse | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.9 | +1.9 to +3.8 | Sufficient evidence | +2.3 | +0.6 | +4.3range +3.8 to +4.9 | 2,829 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Syracuse | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.8 | +0.5 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | +0.3 | +2.8range +2.3 to +3.3 | 1,800 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology