Ryan Conwell
Louisville · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1013:46 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 30:43
- Points per game
- 18.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.8 / 2.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 18.6 | 4.8 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 2.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 24.2 | 6.3 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 3.7 |
| Season totals | 614 | 160 | 89 | 37 | 6 | 70 | 94 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 194–479 | 40.5% | 14.5 | 18.9 |
| 2P | 86–163 | 52.8% | 4.9 | 6.4 |
| 3P | 108–316 | 34.2% | 9.6 | 12.5 |
| FT | 118–143 | 82.5% | 4.3 | 5.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.8% | 56.7% | 66.0% | 29.9% | 1.27 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Louisville · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $540K
- 80% range $350K to $830K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $540K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 74.3%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Louisville: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Louisville | $540Kspeculative | $350K to $830K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.1 | +2.8 to +5.6 | Sufficient evidence | +3.3 | +0.9 | +6.6range +5.8 to +7.4 | 3,494 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Xavier | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +4.2 | +2.8 to +5.3 | Sufficient evidence | +2.9 | +1.2 | +6.5range +5.8 to +7.4 | 3,334 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Indiana St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.7 | +1.6 to +3.7 | Sufficient evidence | +2.0 | +0.7 | +4.3range +3.6 to +5.1 | 2,832 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | South Florida | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.0 | -1.1 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | +0.4 | +1.9range +1.5 to +2.5 | 1,649 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:39 | 30:43 | 19:15–37:39 | |
| Points | 20.0 | 18.6 | 7.0–32.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 49.6% | 53.4% | 30.0%–89.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-21 | Michigan St. | L 69–77 | 33:37 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-15 | 5-11 | 2-4 | 63.3% |
| 2026-03-19 | South Fla. | W 83–79 | 37:01 | 18 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 5-14 | 2-7 | 6-9 | 42.9% |
| 2026-03-12 | Miami (FL) | L 73–78 | 37:39 | 22 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-20 | 1-10 | 5-6 | 42.5% |
| 2026-03-11 | SMU | W 62–58 | 32:23 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 6-15 | 2-9 | 2-2 | 46.7% |
| 2026-03-03 | Syracuse | W 77–62 | 32:35 | 23 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8-20 | 5-13 | 2-2 | 52.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | Clemson | L 75–80 | 28:03 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6-12 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-23 | North Carolina | L 74–77 | 29:02 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-19 | 4-11 | 5-5 | 47.4% |
| 2026-02-21 | Georgia Tech | W 87–70 | 30:28 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-7 | 3-3 | 54.5% |
| 2026-02-17 | SMU | L 85–95 | 32:44 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4-16 | 2-11 | 2-2 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | Baylor | W 82–71 | 29:59 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-5 | 5-7 | 45.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | NC State | W 118–77 | 29:13 | 31 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 10-14 | 5-6 | 6-7 | 89.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Wake Forest | W 88–80 | 26:14 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-04 | Notre Dame | W 76–65 | 33:04 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4-14 | 1-9 | 3-3 | 32.1% |
| 2026-01-31 | SMU | W 88–74 | 34:22 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-15 | 1-11 | 3-3 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-26 | Duke | L 52–83 | 37:28 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-14 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Virginia Tech | W 85–71 | 30:56 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-14 | 4-11 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Pittsburgh | W 100–59 | 30:31 | 24 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9-16 | 5-11 | 1-1 | 71.9% |
| 2026-01-13 | Virginia | L 70–79 | 36:32 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-21 | 3-12 | 1-3 | 31.0% |
| 2026-01-06 | Duke | L 73–84 | 33:38 | 24 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 8-19 | 4-11 | 4-4 | 52.6% |
| 2026-01-02 | Stanford | L 76–80 | 35:11 | 18 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 6-21 | 2-14 | 4-6 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-30 | California | W 90–70 | 24:08 | 26 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8-16 | 6-13 | 4-4 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-20 | Montana | W 94–54 | 31:13 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-15 | 3-11 | 1-1 | 43.3% |
| 2025-12-16 | Tennessee | L 62–83 | 32:42 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7-19 | 4-13 | 4-7 | 47.4% |
| 2025-12-13 | Memphis | W 99–73 | 26:29 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5-11 | 3-7 | 4-4 | 59.1% |
| 2025-12-06 | Indiana | W 87–78 | 31:50 | 21 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4-10 | 3-7 | 10-11 | 55.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Arkansas | L 80–89 | 33:23 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 4-16 | 3-12 | 4-4 | 34.4% |
| 2025-11-26 | NJIT | W 104–47 | 23:59 | 32 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-17 | 8-15 | 6-6 | 76.5% |
| 2025-11-24 | Eastern Mich. | W 87–46 | 20:06 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2025-11-21 | Cincinnati | W 74–64 | 33:45 | 25 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-15 | 5-10 | 4-4 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Ohio | W 106–81 | 27:56 | 22 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7-14 | 5-10 | 3-4 | 67.9% |
| 2025-11-11 | Kentucky | W 96–88 | 31:24 | 24 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6-16 | 4-10 | 8-12 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-06 | Jackson St. | W 106–70 | 26:56 | 19 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-13 | 4-10 | 5-6 | 53.8% |
| 2025-11-03 | South Carolina St. | W 104–45 | 19:15 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 7-8 | 83.3% |