J'Vonne Hadley
Louisville · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
916:07 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 27:46
- Points per game
- 11.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.2 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.4 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.4 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 375 | 171 | 58 | 31 | 10 | 28 | 70 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 140–252 | 55.6% | 7.6 | 11.0 |
| 2P | 105–171 | 61.4% | 5.2 | 7.5 |
| 3P | 35–81 | 43.2% | 2.5 | 3.5 |
| FT | 60–84 | 71.4% | 2.5 | 3.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62.5% | 64.9% | 32.1% | 33.3% | 2.07 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Louisville · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $415K
- 80% range $255K to $615K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $415K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 66.3%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Louisville: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Louisville | $415Kspeculative | $255K to $615K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.5 | +2.4 to +4.4 | Sufficient evidence | +3.3 | +0.2 | +5.6range +5.0 to +6.1 | 3,117 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Louisville | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.1 | +1.6 to +4.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.8 | +1.3 | +6.0range +5.2 to +7.0 | 3,700 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Colorado | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.9 | +0.2 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | +0.5 | +5.3range +4.1 to +6.4 | 3,774 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Colorado | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.1 | +1.0 to +3.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | +2.3 | +2.7range +2.3 to +3.3 | 1,939 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:27 | 27:46 | 2:33–37:18 | |
| Points | 11.8 | 11.4 | 0.0–20.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 63.5% | 63.9% | 12.5%–112.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-21 | Michigan St. | L 69–77 | 29:07 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1-8 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 12.5% |
| 2026-03-19 | South Fla. | W 83–79 | 32:44 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 87.5% |
| 2026-03-12 | Miami (FL) | L 73–78 | 37:18 | 19 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7-12 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-11 | SMU | W 62–58 | 33:59 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 56.3% |
| 2026-03-03 | Syracuse | W 77–62 | 29:09 | 19 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-9 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 94.4% |
| 2026-02-28 | Clemson | L 75–80 | 34:04 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 35.0% |
| 2026-02-23 | North Carolina | L 74–77 | 30:39 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Georgia Tech | W 87–70 | 26:44 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-11 | 1-5 | 4-4 | 59.1% |
| 2026-02-17 | SMU | L 85–95 | 30:35 | 14 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-10 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Baylor | W 82–71 | 30:26 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-10 | 2-2 | 4-4 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | NC State | W 118–77 | 22:00 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Wake Forest | W 88–80 | 21:49 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-7 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 78.6% |
| 2026-02-04 | Notre Dame | W 76–65 | 2:33 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-31 | SMU | W 88–74 | 29:25 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-3 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-26 | Duke | L 52–83 | 29:36 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Virginia Tech | W 85–71 | 31:20 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 68.8% |
| 2026-01-17 | Pittsburgh | W 100–59 | 30:55 | 17 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7-9 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-13 | Virginia | L 70–79 | 35:28 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-7 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | Boston College | W 75–62 | 29:17 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-7 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-06 | Duke | L 73–84 | 29:27 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2026-01-02 | Stanford | L 76–80 | 32:16 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-30 | California | W 90–70 | 31:01 | 11 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 64.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | Montana | W 94–54 | 27:26 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-16 | Tennessee | L 62–83 | 26:53 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-8 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Memphis | W 99–73 | 19:30 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 112.5% |
| 2025-12-06 | Indiana | W 87–78 | 32:25 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-13 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Arkansas | L 80–89 | 28:20 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-26 | NJIT | W 104–47 | 25:03 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-24 | Eastern Mich. | W 87–46 | 24:20 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Cincinnati | W 74–64 | 18:53 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Ohio | W 106–81 | 24:57 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 2-5 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Kentucky | W 96–88 | 27:08 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 0-4 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | South Carolina St. | W 104–45 | 21:20 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-7 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 78.6% |