Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

J'Vonne Hadley

Louisville · 33 available appearances · 2025–2025 · Linked seasons and observed career performance

Available player-season logs · Partial career coverage

Logged performance

1095:16 minutes logged

Games logged
33
Minutes per game
33:11
Points per game
12.1
Rebounds / assists per game
7.4 / 1.8
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game12.17.41.80.70.21.72.0
Per 40 minutes14.68.92.20.90.32.02.4
Season totals400243602485565
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG147–28551.6%8.610.4
2P116–20357.1%6.27.4
3P31–8237.8%2.53.0
FT75–9975.8%3.03.6
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
57.0%60.9%28.8%34.7%1.09

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensationβ

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons. The logs on this page are from seasons before 2025–26. A speculative best guess with an 80% range exists for 2025–26 only, for players on a modelled team; this player's by-season table below shows it for 2025–26 if one is published, and the linked athlete page has the full card.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Loading Model-implied values by season

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
Season and dateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2025 · 2025-03-20CreightonL 75–8934:40138100045-80-13-462.5%
2025 · 2025-03-15DukeL 62–7337:2965111312-50-22-440.0%
2025 · 2025-03-14ClemsonW 76–7337:44209211336-92-36-777.8%
2025 · 2025-03-13StanfordW 75–7338:2646300002-80-20-025.0%
2025 · 2025-03-08StanfordW 68–4835:05119200204-61-22-375.0%
2025 · 2025-03-01PittsburghW 79–6835:0945300131-70-22-214.3%
2025 · 2025-02-25Virginia TechW 71–6634:10118220205-101-20-055.0%
2025 · 2025-02-22Florida StW 89–8138:171811111017-112-22-272.7%
2025 · 2025-02-16Notre DameW 75–6034:14107200314-92-40-055.6%
2025 · 2025-02-12NC StateW 91–6636:01179420107-111-22-268.2%
2025 · 2025-02-08Miami FLW 88–7839:05127220126-100-10-060.0%
2025 · 2025-02-05Boston CollegeW 84–5834:18224120008-122-24-675.0%
2025 · 2025-02-01Georgia TechL 70–7726:20162310156-102-52-370.0%
2025 · 2025-01-28Wake ForestW 72–5934:0567320022-100-42-220.0%
2025 · 2025-01-21SMUW 98–7330:28167110145-82-44-475.0%
2025 · 2025-01-18VirginiaW 81–6734:11133110135-81-12-368.8%
2025 · 2025-01-14SyracuseW 85–6131:201310300306-111-30-059.1%
2025 · 2025-01-11PittsburghW 82–7827:40135100145-82-51-375.0%
2025 · 2025-01-07ClemsonW 74–6436:0232104103310-123-39-1195.8%
2025 · 2025-01-04VirginiaW 70–5036:10115001104-91-32-250.0%
2025 · 2025-01-01North CarolinaW 83–7026:35107300443-60-04-550.0%
2025 · 2024-12-28E KentuckyW 78–7636:171510032315-131-34-442.3%
2025 · 2024-12-21Florida StW 90–7631:5898010003-81-12-243.8%
2025 · 2024-12-14KentuckyL 85–9337:37106110014-110-22-336.4%
2025 · 2024-12-11UTEPW 77–7434:541312301225-100-33-550.0%
2025 · 2024-12-08DukeL 65–7633:0778300233-81-50-043.8%
2025 · 2024-12-03MississippiL 63–8634:00129200305-80-12-462.5%
2025 · 2024-11-29OklahomaL 64–6930:221213100533-81-45-743.8%
2025 · 2024-11-28West VirginiaW 79–7028:2765300152-50-12-340.0%
2025 · 2024-11-27IndianaW 89–6128:5388300324-50-00-180.0%
2025 · 2024-11-22WinthropW 76–6131:381213010245-90-12-355.6%
2025 · 2024-11-09TennesseeL 55–7728:3234110311-41-30-037.5%
2025 · 2024-11-04Morehead StW 93–4522:02153001034-83-54-468.8%

Secondary NCAA-derived SportsDataverse archive; reconstructed player statistics. Corroborated against Kaggle dates, participants, scores and overtime; incomplete identity coverage is retained.