La Salle

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for La Salle, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Ashton Walker	68.8%	+0.8range -0.4 to +2.2Sufficient evidence	+3.2range +2.8 to +3.5Sufficient evidence	$105KspeculativeLoading	$33K to $305KLoading
Rob Dockery	68.5%	+0.5range -0.4 to +1.9Sufficient evidence	+3.1range +2.8 to +3.4Sufficient evidence	$100KspeculativeLoading	$30K to $295KLoading
Jaeden Marshall	55.1%	-2.0range -3.5 to -0.8Sufficient evidence	+2.0range +1.6 to +2.4Sufficient evidence	$16KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $78KLoading
Jaden Johnson	46.3%	-1.1range -2.0 to -0.2Sufficient evidence	+1.9range +1.7 to +2.1Sufficient evidence	$24KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $81KLoading
Josiah Harris	43.5%	-0.2range -1.2 to +0.8Sufficient evidence	+2.0range +1.7 to +2.2Sufficient evidence	$42KspeculativeLoading	$6K to $120KLoading
Truth Harris	43.0%	-2.3range -4.1 to -0.8Sufficient evidence	+1.5range +1.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidence	$12KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $58KLoading
Jerome Brewer, Jr.	41.7%	+0.3range -1.2 to +1.5Sufficient evidence	+2.0range +1.7 to +2.2Sufficient evidence	$49KspeculativeLoading	$9K to $150KLoading
Edwin Daniel	35.4%	-0.2range -1.3 to +0.8Sufficient evidence	+1.6range +1.4 to +1.8Sufficient evidence	$31KspeculativeLoading	$5K to $96KLoading
Eric Acker	34.9%	-1.6range -2.5 to -0.7Sufficient evidence	+1.4range +1.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence	$13KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $55KLoading
Justin Archer	17.6%	+1.0range +0.3 to +1.6Sufficient evidence	+1.0range +0.9 to +1.0Sufficient evidence	$34KspeculativeLoading	$13K to $105KLoading
Damon Strand	17.3%	-1.4range -2.4 to -0.4Sufficient evidence	+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Sufficient evidence	$10KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $32KLoading
Nas Hart	16.0%	-0.8range -1.8 to +0.1Sufficient evidence	+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Sufficient evidence	$12KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $37KLoading
Bowyn Beatty	7.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$3Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $8KLoading
Noah Collier	2.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$3Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $8KLoading
Max Lipacis	1.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$3Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $8KLoading
Arlan Masharaliyev	0.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$3Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $8KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $555K; 80% Range $240K to $1.25M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $505K to $670K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 16; 4 floor only

The widest scenario range, $295K to $1.50M, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Ashton Walker	68.8%	$105K	$33K to $305K	17.2%	$94K to $125K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rob Dockery	68.5%	$100K	$30K to $295K	17.0%	$90K to $120K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaeden Marshall	55.1%	$16K	$2K to $78K	4.1%	$15K to $20K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaden Johnson	46.3%	$24K	$2K to $81K	6.2%	$22K to $29K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Josiah Harris	43.5%	$42K	$6K to $120K	8.7%	$38K to $51K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Truth Harris	43.0%	$12K	$2K to $58K	3.0%	$11K to $14K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jerome Brewer, Jr.	41.7%	$49K	$9K to $150K	9.3%	$45K to $59K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Edwin Daniel	35.4%	$31K	$5K to $96K	6.8%	$29K to $38K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Eric Acker	34.9%	$13K	$2K to $55K	3.8%	$12K to $16K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Justin Archer	17.6%	$34K	$13K to $105K	5.4%	$31K to $41K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Damon Strand	17.3%	$10K	$2K to $32K	2.4%	$9K to $12K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Nas Hart	16.0%	$12K	$3K to $37K	3.0%	$11K to $15K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Bowyn Beatty	7.8%	$3K	$1K to $8K	0.6%	$3K to $4K	$3K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Noah Collier	2.4%	$3K	$1K to $8K	0.6%	$3K to $4K	$3K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Max Lipacis	1.1%	$3K	$1K to $8K	0.6%	$3K to $4K	$3K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Arlan Masharaliyev	0.5%	$3K	$1K to $8K	0.6%	$3K to $4K	$3K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$555K	$240K to $1.25M	100%	$505K to $670K	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, La Salle University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$3,832,568	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$3,832,568
Athletics department expenses	$18,223,715
Athletics department revenue	$18,223,715

Coverage and exclusions

29 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (97%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

1 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue	$3,832,568	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$3,832,568	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
1 day	2
2 days	1
3 or more days	26

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	1
Longest run of consecutive away games	3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology