Bryant

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Bryant, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Timofei Rudovskii	78.9%	-1.1range -2.4 to +0.3Sufficient evidence	+3.0range +2.5 to +3.4Sufficient evidence	$31KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $120KLoading
Ashley Sims, II	78.2%	-2.1range -3.3 to -0.8Sufficient evidence	+2.6range +2.2 to +3.0Sufficient evidence	$11KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $63KLoading
Ty Tabales	67.7%	-1.0range -2.4 to +0.5Sufficient evidence	+2.6range +2.2 to +3.0Sufficient evidence	$26KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $110KLoading
Keegan Harvey	67.0%	-1.4range -2.6 to -0.3Sufficient evidence	+2.5range +2.1 to +2.8Sufficient evidence	$18KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $81KLoading
Aaron Davis	54.8%	-1.4range -2.4 to -0.1Sufficient evidence	+2.1range +1.8 to +2.4Sufficient evidence	$17KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $76KLoading
Jakai Robinson	37.6%	-0.9range -2.3 to +0.4Sufficient evidence	+1.6range +1.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence	$17KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $86KLoading
Quincy Allen	32.9%	-2.2range -3.1 to -0.9Sufficient evidence	+1.2range +1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidence	$6KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $28KLoading
Khalil Williams	21.9%	-3.2range -4.0 to -1.9Sufficient evidence	+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Sufficient evidence	$3KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $15KLoading
Ethane Bourgade	14.6%	-1.0range -1.7 to -0.4Limited evidence	+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidence	$6KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $22KLoading
Lennart Weber	14.4%	-0.8range -1.6 to +0.1Limited evidence	+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidence	$8KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $34KLoading
Gio Sanford	14.3%	-1.1range -1.9 to -0.2Limited evidence	+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidence	$6KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $25KLoading
Daniel Akoue	12.7%	-0.2range -0.8 to +0.4Limited evidence	+0.6range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidence	$11KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $58KLoading
Joseph Green	2.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$1Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$0 to $4KLoading
Langston Bailey	0.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$1Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$0 to $4KLoading
Frankie Vassalluzzo	0.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$1Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$0 to $4KLoading
Jason Sepe	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$1Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$0 to $4KLoading
Jaheim Nyam	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$1Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$0 to $4KLoading
Michael DeOrsey	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$1Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$0 to $4KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $250K; 80% Range $91K to $660K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $245K to $255K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 18; 6 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Timofei Rudovskii	78.9%	$31K	$1K to $120K	15.3%	$30K to $31K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ashley Sims, II	78.2%	$11K	$1K to $63K	8.7%	$11K to $12K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ty Tabales	67.7%	$26K	$1K to $110K	12.9%	$25K to $27K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Keegan Harvey	67.0%	$18K	$1K to $81K	10.8%	$18K to $19K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Aaron Davis	54.8%	$17K	$1K to $76K	9.4%	$16K to $17K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jakai Robinson	37.6%	$17K	$1K to $86K	7.7%	$16K to $17K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Quincy Allen	32.9%	$6K	$1K to $28K	3.7%	$5K to $6K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Khalil Williams	21.9%	$3K	$1K to $15K	0.9%	$3K in all four	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ethane Bourgade	14.6%	$6K	$1K to $22K	3.1%	$6K in all four	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Lennart Weber	14.4%	$8K	$1K to $34K	3.4%	$8K in all four	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Gio Sanford	14.3%	$6K	$1K to $25K	3.0%	$6K in all four	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Daniel Akoue	12.7%	$11K	$3K to $58K	3.6%	$10K to $11K	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Joseph Green	2.6%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.5%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Langston Bailey	0.8%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.5%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Frankie Vassalluzzo	0.5%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.5%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaheim Nyam	0.3%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.5%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jason Sepe	0.3%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.5%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Michael DeOrsey	0.3%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.5%	$1K in all four	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$250K	$91K to $660K	100%	$245K to $255K	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Bryant University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,706,415	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$2,706,415
Athletics department expenses	$28,476,424
Athletics department revenue	$28,476,424

Coverage and exclusions

27 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (93%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

2 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue	$2,706,415	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$2,706,415	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
2 days	5
3 or more days	23

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	2
Longest run of consecutive away games	4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology