Kahmare Holmes
Wofford · 2025–26 · 25 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
800:26 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 25
- Minutes per game
- 32:01
- Points per game
- 19.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.8 / 2.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 19.8 | 5.8 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 24.7 | 7.2 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 495 | 144 | 68 | 47 | 7 | 46 | 60 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 167–350 | 47.7% | 14.0 | 17.5 |
| 2P | 122–224 | 54.5% | 9.0 | 11.2 |
| 3P | 45–126 | 35.7% | 5.0 | 6.3 |
| FT | 116–177 | 65.5% | 7.1 | 8.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.1% | 57.8% | 36.0% | 50.6% | 1.48 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Wofford · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $50K
- 80% range $17K to $135K
- Median share of team pool
- 18.0%
- team pool $270K, 80% range $98K to $710K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $45K to $52K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 79.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Wofford: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Wofford | $50Kspeculative | $17K to $135K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.4 | +0.6 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | -0.1 | +5.6range +5.0 to +6.2 | 967 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Wofford | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -2.3 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -1.2 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.5 | 998 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 36:21 | 32:01 | 22:15–40:34 | |
| Points | 21.6 | 19.8 | 4.0–36.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 58.7% | 54.5% | 18.2%–92.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 · NCAA | UNC Greensboro | L 72–75 | 34:00 | 24 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10-20 | 3-6 | 1-9 | 57.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | The Citadel | L 90–93 | 40:34 | 25 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10-19 | 3-9 | 2-3 | 60.5% |
| 2026-02-25 · NCAA | ETSU | W 72–69 | 34:48 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-14 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 53.6% |
| 2026-02-21 | Furman | L 67–76 | 37:45 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-12 | 2-5 | 6-13 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-18 · NCAA | VMI | W 82–76 | 34:36 | 22 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-11 | 2-6 | 8-10 | 63.6% |
| 2026-01-29 | Chattanooga | W 81–55 | 22:15 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-15 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 43.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Mercer | W 80–77 | 34:50 | 27 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10-20 | 1-4 | 6-7 | 52.5% |
| 2026-01-21 · NCAA | Samford | W 88–78 | 37:06 | 36 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10-16 | 2-4 | 14-18 | 68.8% |
| 2026-01-17 | Furman | W 74–70 | 32:22 | 20 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7-15 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Chattanooga | L 67–76 | 31:41 | 22 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-17 | 3-6 | 5-8 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 · NCAA | Mercer | L 97–109 | 33:00 | 22 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8-17 | 2-6 | 4-8 | 52.9% |
| 2026-01-07 · NCAA | UNC Greensboro | W 97–85 | 27:42 | 27 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-13 | 1-2 | 10-13 | 65.4% |
| 2026-01-03 | The Citadel | W 95–86 | 36:53 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6-16 | 1-4 | 3-5 | 40.6% |
| 2025-12-31 | Western Caro. | W 79–74 | 28:52 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-17 · NCAA | Wichita St. | L 73–84 | 30:48 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 6-11 | 1-4 | 5-9 | 59.1% |
| 2025-12-15 · NCAA | Gardner-Webb | W 83–57 | 28:24 | 15 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-13 | 0-3 | 3-6 | 46.2% |
| 2025-12-06 · NCAA | Elon | L 52–73 | 30:36 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-16 | 0-6 | 2-4 | 31.3% |
| 2025-12-03 | Presbyterian | W 63–56 | 27:38 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-17 | 2-7 | 4-5 | 35.3% |
| 2025-11-29 · NCAA | Eastern Ky. | W 83–77 | 32:30 | 30 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10-13 | 4-5 | 6-7 | 92.3% |
| 2025-11-26 · NCAA | Northern Ky. | L 83–93 | 31:30 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5-10 | 2-4 | 9-13 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-19 · NCAA | North Florida | W 86–78 | 29:12 | 21 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7-11 | 1-3 | 6-7 | 68.2% |
| 2025-11-15 · NCAA | Bellarmine | W 94–86 | 33:48 | 24 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8-12 | 5-6 | 3-6 | 87.5% |
| 2025-11-11 · NCAA | Auburn | L 62–93 | 23:18 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-11 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-08 · NCAA | Milwaukee | W 86–76 | 33:48 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-12 | 0-0 | 10-11 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-03 · NCAA | George Mason | L 46–70 | 32:30 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2-11 | 0-7 | 0-1 | 18.2% |