Tylen Riley
Tulsa · 2025–26 · 35 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
987:52 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 35
- Minutes per game
- 28:13
- Points per game
- 14.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.9 / 4.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.6 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 20.7 | 5.5 | 6.2 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 3.8 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 512 | 137 | 154 | 32 | 5 | 94 | 69 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 154–357 | 43.1% | 10.2 | 14.5 |
| 2P | 131–292 | 44.9% | 8.3 | 11.8 |
| 3P | 23–65 | 35.4% | 1.9 | 2.6 |
| FT | 181–211 | 85.8% | 6.0 | 8.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.4% | 56.9% | 18.2% | 59.1% | 1.64 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Tulsa · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $98K
- 80% range $35K to $235K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.9%
- team pool $925K, 80% range $415K to $2.05M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $89K to $105K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 70.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Tulsa: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tulsa | $98Kspeculative | $35K to $235K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.9 | +0.7 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +2.4 | -0.6 | +5.9range +5.2 to +6.7 | 3,373 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Cal Baptist | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.1 | -1.1 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.1 | +1.8range +1.5 to +2.1 | 1,394 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Cal Baptist | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.4 | -2.4 to -0.6 | Limited evidence | -1.4 | -0.1 | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.8 | 597 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:37 | 28:13 | 18:32–41:47 | |
| Points | 14.0 | 14.6 | 6.0–30.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 28.3% | 47.0% | 8.3%–86.4% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-05 | Auburn | L 86–92 | 39:33 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-15 | 1-3 | 7-8 | 43.3% |
| 2026-04-02 | New Mexico | W 74–69 | 28:52 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-11 | 0-1 | 6-8 | 18.2% |
| 2026-03-24 | Wichita St. | W 83–79 | 30:02 | 21 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6-14 | 1-2 | 8-8 | 46.4% |
| 2026-03-22 | UNLV | W 77–66 | 28:54 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-8 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-17 | SFA | W 89–84 | 30:45 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-12 | 0-1 | 8-11 | 8.3% |
| 2026-03-14 | Wichita St. | L 68–81 | 32:48 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-15 | 3-3 | 3-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-13 | North Texas | W 90–84 | 41:47 | 26 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 4-14 | 1-3 | 17-17 | 32.1% |
| 2026-03-08 | Temple | W 78–76 | 28:43 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-3 | 7-9 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-05 | East Carolina | W 93–66 | 28:21 | 16 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-25 | Tulane | W 90–56 | 26:15 | 15 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-11 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 68.2% |
| 2026-02-22 | UTSA | W 100–74 | 28:04 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Charlotte | W 79–74 | 34:26 | 15 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 5-5 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-14 | Wichita St. | L 77–81 | 30:27 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9-14 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 67.9% |
| 2026-02-11 | UAB | L 63–68 | 30:42 | 15 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7-15 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | South Fla. | L 74–80 | 28:03 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Fla. Atlantic | W 78–76 | 23:31 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-01 | Wichita St. | W 93–83 | 30:05 | 30 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 9-11 | 1-2 | 11-13 | 86.4% |
| 2026-01-28 | North Texas | W 82–66 | 30:13 | 20 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-10 | 1-2 | 7-7 | 65.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Rice | W 87–81 | 18:32 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-21 | Memphis | W 83–66 | 31:18 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-15 | 0-4 | 8-8 | 26.7% |
| 2026-01-18 | UAB | W 99–77 | 28:36 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Charlotte | W 86–74 | 29:33 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-12 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | South Fla. | L 78–93 | 26:20 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-04 | North Texas | L 67–72 | 28:38 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3-11 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 27.3% |
| 2025-12-31 | Rice | W 97–48 | 21:52 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-22 | Denver | W 90–85 | 27:57 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-14 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-19 | Western Ky. | W 82–81 | 27:13 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-10 | 0-4 | 8-8 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 117–84 | 19:53 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 5-6 | 56.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | Missouri St. | W 98–74 | 23:55 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-9 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-26 | UNI | W 63–60 | 24:25 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 43.8% |
| 2025-11-25 | San Jose St. | W 81–51 | 18:52 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Austin Peay | W 84–75 | 29:03 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-4 | 8-8 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-17 | Kansas St. | L 83–84 | 27:04 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-12 | Oral Roberts | W 88–87 | 29:22 | 16 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-10 | 1-1 | 9-10 | 35.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Rhode Island | W 82–65 | 23:48 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4-6 | 1-1 | 4-8 | 75.0% |