Myles Rigsby
Tulsa · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
550:32 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 18:21
- Points per game
- 6.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.0 / 1.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.1 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.4 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 184 | 59 | 36 | 27 | 9 | 26 | 43 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 59–112 | 52.7% | 3.7 | 8.1 |
| 2P | 47–72 | 65.3%† | 2.4 | 5.2 |
| 3P | 12–40 | 30.0%† | 1.3 | 2.9 |
| FT | 54–61 | 88.5% | 2.0 | 4.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58.0% | 66.3% | 35.7% | 54.5% | 1.38 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Tulsa · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $53K
- 80% range $17K to $135K
- Median share of team pool
- 6.5%
- team pool $925K, 80% range $415K to $2.05M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $48K to $55K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 38.1%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Tulsa: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tulsa | $53Kspeculative | $17K to $135K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.6 | +0.4 to +2.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | +1.1 | +3.0range +2.5 to +3.4 | 1,822 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Troy | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.2 | +1.3 to +2.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +1.8 | +4.2range +3.7 to +4.8 | 2,734 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Troy | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.0 | +0.7 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | +1.6 | +3.6range +3.0 to +4.3 | 2,481 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 15:49 | 18:21 | 5:47–28:05 | |
| Points | 4.0 | 6.1 | 0.0–16.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 72.7% | 64.2% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-05 | Auburn | L 86–92 | 11:58 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-04-02 | New Mexico | W 74–69 | 13:31 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2026-03-24 | Wichita St. | W 83–79 | 16:52 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-22 | UNLV | W 77–66 | 22:51 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 80.0% |
| 2026-03-17 | SFA | W 89–84 | 13:51 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-14 | Wichita St. | L 68–81 | 18:44 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-13 | North Texas | W 90–84 | 21:33 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 64.3% |
| 2026-03-08 | Temple | W 78–76 | 18:40 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-05 | East Carolina | W 93–66 | 14:03 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 116.7% |
| 2026-02-25 | Tulane | W 90–56 | 20:13 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Charlotte | W 79–74 | 5:47 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-14 | Wichita St. | L 77–81 | 13:17 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | UAB | L 63–68 | 16:00 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | South Fla. | L 74–80 | 16:14 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-04 | Fla. Atlantic | W 78–76 | 17:05 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-01 | Wichita St. | W 93–83 | 13:50 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | North Texas | W 82–66 | 23:50 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Rice | W 87–81 | 24:31 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Memphis | W 83–66 | 16:01 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | South Fla. | L 78–93 | 10:06 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | — |
| 2026-01-04 | North Texas | L 67–72 | 21:40 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Rice | W 97–48 | 20:22 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 80.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Denver | W 90–85 | 26:46 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6-13 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 53.8% |
| 2025-12-19 | Western Ky. | W 82–81 | 23:59 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-6 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-10 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 117–84 | 21:32 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 116.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | Missouri St. | W 98–74 | 19:38 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 8-8 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | UNI | W 63–60 | 28:05 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-25 | San Jose St. | W 81–51 | 17:23 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Austin Peay | W 84–75 | 17:34 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Kansas St. | L 83–84 | 24:36 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 8-8 | 50.0% |