Jaylen Lawal
Tulsa · 2025–26 · 35 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
459:41 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 35
- Minutes per game
- 13:08
- Points per game
- 7.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.1 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.3 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 22.3 | 6.4 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 4.0 |
| Season totals | 256 | 73 | 50 | 10 | 1 | 28 | 46 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 80–188 | 42.6% | 5.4 | 16.4 |
| 2P | 42–90 | 46.7%† | 2.6 | 7.8 |
| 3P | 38–98 | 38.8% | 2.8 | 8.5 |
| FT | 58–75 | 77.3% | 2.1 | 6.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.7% | 57.9% | 52.1% | 39.9% | 1.79 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Tulsa · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $70K
- 80% range $28K to $170K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.4%
- team pool $925K, 80% range $415K to $2.05M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $64K to $74K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 31.4%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Tulsa: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tulsa | $70Kspeculative | $28K to $170K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.4 | +2.2 to +4.5 | Sufficient evidence | +2.5 | +0.8 | +2.8range +2.5 to +3.1 | 1,503 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 13:36 | 13:08 | 5:24–23:27 | |
| Points | 9.8 | 7.3 | 0.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 65.5% | 49.5% | 0.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-05 | Auburn | L 86–92 | 5:24 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 75.0% |
| 2026-04-02 | New Mexico | W 74–69 | 15:49 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-03-24 | Wichita St. | W 83–79 | 11:40 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 35.7% |
| 2026-03-22 | UNLV | W 77–66 | 13:24 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-03-17 | SFA | W 89–84 | 21:44 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-12 | 3-6 | 7-9 | 70.8% |
| 2026-03-14 | Wichita St. | L 68–81 | 10:35 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 125.0% |
| 2026-03-13 | North Texas | W 90–84 | 14:19 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 90.0% |
| 2026-03-08 | Temple | W 78–76 | 11:17 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-05 | East Carolina | W 93–66 | 11:24 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-25 | Tulane | W 90–56 | 13:30 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-22 | UTSA | W 100–74 | 14:53 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 16.7% |
| 2026-02-18 | Charlotte | W 79–74 | 5:27 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Wichita St. | L 77–81 | 10:36 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-11 | UAB | L 63–68 | 9:17 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | South Fla. | L 74–80 | 11:56 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Fla. Atlantic | W 78–76 | 12:36 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-01 | Wichita St. | W 93–83 | 9:36 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | North Texas | W 82–66 | 10:17 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Rice | W 87–81 | 21:28 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-15 | 2-7 | 3-4 | 46.7% |
| 2026-01-21 | Memphis | W 83–66 | 8:42 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-18 | UAB | W 99–77 | 11:20 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 41.7% |
| 2026-01-14 | Charlotte | W 86–74 | 10:15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | South Fla. | L 78–93 | 13:27 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | North Texas | L 67–72 | 13:59 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 20.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Rice | W 97–48 | 23:27 | 25 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9-12 | 5-6 | 2-2 | 95.8% |
| 2025-12-22 | Denver | W 90–85 | 12:01 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-19 | Western Ky. | W 82–81 | 12:47 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 117–84 | 18:34 | 20 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-11 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 77.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | Missouri St. | W 98–74 | 15:43 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | UNI | W 63–60 | 15:35 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-25 | San Jose St. | W 81–51 | 18:33 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Austin Peay | W 84–75 | 10:28 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Kansas St. | L 83–84 | 12:56 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-7 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 21.4% |
| 2025-11-12 | Oral Roberts | W 88–87 | 11:08 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-07 | Rhode Island | W 82–65 | 15:34 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 57.1% |