David Green
Tulsa · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
913:02 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 27:40
- Points per game
- 16.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.5 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 16.4 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 23.7 | 6.5 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.6 |
| Season totals | 540 | 149 | 55 | 20 | 22 | 45 | 82 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 186–375 | 49.6% | 11.4 | 16.4 |
| 2P | 124–215 | 57.7% | 6.5 | 9.4 |
| 3P | 62–160 | 38.8% | 4.8 | 7.0 |
| FT | 106–154 | 68.8% | 4.7 | 6.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.9% | 61.0% | 42.7% | 41.1% | 1.22 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Tulsa · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $185K
- 80% range $78K to $445K
- Median share of team pool
- 18.8%
- team pool $925K, 80% range $415K to $2.05M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $165K to $195K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 64.8%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Tulsa: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tulsa | $185Kspeculative | $78K to $445K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.7 | +3.3 to +5.9 | Sufficient evidence | +3.2 | +1.5 | +6.9range +6.0 to +7.6 | 3,102 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Rhode Island | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.4 | +0.4 to +2.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | -0.0 | +3.8range +3.3 to +4.5 | 2,774 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Rhode Island | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -1.2 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -1.2 | +1.5range +1.2 to +1.8 | 1,543 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:18 | 27:40 | 12:02–50:40 | |
| Points | 12.6 | 16.4 | 5.0–34.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 39.0% | 57.2% | 22.7%–94.4% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-05 | Auburn | L 86–92 | 41:49 | 25 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 8-17 | 1-7 | 8-9 | 50.0% |
| 2026-04-02 | New Mexico | W 74–69 | 29:27 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3-10 | 0-6 | 7-8 | 30.0% |
| 2026-03-24 | Wichita St. | W 83–79 | 22:34 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-14 | Wichita St. | L 68–81 | 12:02 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 35.7% |
| 2026-03-13 | North Texas | W 90–84 | 50:40 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5-13 | 2-7 | 3-4 | 46.2% |
| 2026-03-08 | Temple | W 78–76 | 29:57 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-3 | 10-13 | 54.5% |
| 2026-03-05 | East Carolina | W 93–66 | 25:20 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-25 | Tulane | W 90–56 | 19:43 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-12 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 79.2% |
| 2026-02-22 | UTSA | W 100–74 | 27:30 | 27 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-13 | 3-4 | 6-8 | 80.8% |
| 2026-02-18 | Charlotte | W 79–74 | 30:32 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-11 | 1-7 | 2-4 | 22.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Wichita St. | L 77–81 | 30:14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2-10 | 1-5 | 5-6 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | UAB | L 63–68 | 28:21 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4-12 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-08 | South Fla. | L 74–80 | 29:09 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6-13 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 57.7% |
| 2026-02-04 | Fla. Atlantic | W 78–76 | 30:54 | 27 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 11-20 | 1-5 | 4-5 | 57.5% |
| 2026-02-01 | Wichita St. | W 93–83 | 29:41 | 19 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7-12 | 3-4 | 2-6 | 70.8% |
| 2026-01-28 | North Texas | W 82–66 | 28:56 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-24 | Rice | W 87–81 | 29:44 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-9 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-21 | Memphis | W 83–66 | 25:30 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-8 | 2-4 | 7-10 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-18 | UAB | W 99–77 | 29:28 | 26 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 12-17 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 76.5% |
| 2026-01-14 | Charlotte | W 86–74 | 31:46 | 21 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-13 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 73.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | South Fla. | L 78–93 | 30:52 | 34 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10-15 | 4-7 | 10-12 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | North Texas | L 67–72 | 29:41 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 7-11 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 68.2% |
| 2025-12-31 | Rice | W 97–48 | 29:53 | 19 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8-11 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 86.4% |
| 2025-12-22 | Denver | W 90–85 | 19:30 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8-9 | 1-1 | 6-7 | 94.4% |
| 2025-12-19 | Western Ky. | W 82–81 | 23:43 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-12 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 117–84 | 18:31 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 6-7 | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | Missouri St. | W 98–74 | 19:54 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-11 | 3-7 | 2-3 | 68.2% |
| 2025-11-26 | UNI | W 63–60 | 23:03 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-9 | 2-8 | 0-1 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-25 | San Jose St. | W 81–51 | 23:12 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-9 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 72.2% |
| 2025-11-21 | Austin Peay | W 84–75 | 28:09 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6-10 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Kansas St. | L 83–84 | 25:36 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-16 | 2-9 | 3-6 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | Oral Roberts | W 88–87 | 30:12 | 21 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 7-13 | 1-4 | 6-10 | 57.7% |
| 2025-11-07 | Rhode Island | W 82–65 | 27:29 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6-12 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 54.2% |