Teagan Moore
Western Ky. · 2025–26 · 25 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
739:13 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 25
- Minutes per game
- 29:34
- Points per game
- 19.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.7 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 19.2 | 5.7 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 26.0 | 7.7 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 481 | 142 | 44 | 25 | 8 | 45 | 65 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 149–275 | 54.2% | 11.0 | 14.9 |
| 2P | 121–212 | 57.1% | 8.5 | 11.5 |
| 3P | 28–63 | 44.4% | 2.5 | 3.4 |
| FT | 155–196 | 79.1% | 7.8 | 10.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59.3% | 66.6% | 22.9% | 71.3% | 0.98 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
WKU · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $45K
- 80% range $15K to $135K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.3%
- team pool $265K, 80% range $100K to $725K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $44K to $45K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 59.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
WKU: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | WKU | $45Kspeculative | $15K to $135K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.4 | +1.1 to +3.6 | Sufficient evidence | +2.8 | -0.3 | +5.1range +4.4 to +5.6 | 2,357 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | WKU | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.4 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -1.5 | +1.2range +1.0 to +1.5 | 1,260 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27:53 | 29:34 | 15:13–40:09 | |
| Points | 20.6 | 19.2 | 5.0–28.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 64.9% | 59.6% | 25.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-12 | Kennesaw St. | L 87–96 | 35:32 | 27 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 7-14 | 2-4 | 11-14 | 57.1% |
| 2026-03-07 | FIU | L 67–92 | 15:13 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-03-05 | Missouri St. | L 74–87 | 25:33 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 7-9 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-28 | UTEP | W 97–65 | 33:55 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8-10 | 1-1 | 7-8 | 85.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | New Mexico St. | W 93–70 | 29:11 | 23 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8-13 | 1-3 | 6-11 | 65.4% |
| 2026-02-21 | Liberty | W 94–73 | 30:14 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6-11 | 3-3 | 6-7 | 68.2% |
| 2026-02-18 | Delaware | W 88–87 | 33:46 | 27 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-14 | 1-3 | 8-9 | 67.9% |
| 2026-02-14 | Middle Tenn. | W 82–80 | 25:03 | 28 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-10 | 3-4 | 13-15 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Liberty | L 69–76 | 31:33 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5-8 | 3-4 | 6-10 | 81.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | Kennesaw St. | L 65–81 | 35:25 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Missouri St. | W 87–72 | 27:46 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-2 | 8-8 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | UTEP | W 68–56 | 24:33 | 19 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7-8 | 2-2 | 3-5 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | New Mexico St. | L 64–80 | 23:16 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | Louisiana Tech | W 66–61 | 32:54 | 19 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-11 | 3-5 | 6-6 | 59.1% |
| 2026-01-02 | Sam Houston | W 102–91 | 34:36 | 28 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9-18 | 3-8 | 7-10 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-29 | Jacksonville St. | L 67–78 | 32:33 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-10 | 1-1 | 8-12 | 45.0% |
| 2025-12-19 | Tulsa | L 81–82 | 30:52 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 54.5% |
| 2025-12-10 | Marshall | L 61–77 | 23:59 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-06 | Evansville | W 80–79 | 30:19 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 7-7 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | Wichita St. | W 75–70 | 25:34 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 6-7 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-27 | South Fla. | L 91–97 | 40:09 | 27 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9-18 | 1-6 | 8-9 | 52.8% |
| 2025-11-26 | Vanderbilt | L 78–83 | 34:44 | 24 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 6-12 | 1-3 | 11-11 | 54.2% |
| 2025-11-16 | Tennessee St. | W 95–82 | 27:36 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 77.8% |
| 2025-11-10 | Eastern Ky. | W 87–79 | 30:20 | 22 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-15 | 1-2 | 5-8 | 56.7% |
| 2025-11-03 | Tennessee Tech | W 82–70 | 24:37 | 16 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 40.0% |