Isaiah Elohim
Fla. Atlantic · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
871:40 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 29:03
- Points per game
- 12.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.1 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.2 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.7 | 5.6 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 365 | 123 | 32 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 63 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 131–288 | 45.5% | 9.6 | 13.2 |
| 2P | 96–190 | 50.5% | 6.3 | 8.7 |
| 3P | 35–98 | 35.7% | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| FT | 68–104 | 65.4% | 3.5 | 4.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.6% | 54.7% | 34.0% | 36.1% | 1.23 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
FL Atlantic · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $61K
- 80% range $7K to $175K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.5%
- team pool $825K, 80% range $370K to $1.85M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $55K to $64K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $6K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 71.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
FL Atlantic: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | FL Atlantic | $61Kspeculative | $7K to $175K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.1 | -1.3 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -0.4 | +4.7range +4.0 to +5.3 | 2,929 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 28:53 | 29:03 | 20:39–36:08 | |
| Points | 9.6 | 12.2 | 5.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 39.5% | 51.5% | 11.1%–93.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-12 | North Texas | L 70–74 | 33:44 | 20 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-10 | 2-4 | 8-11 | 60.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | Temple | W 63–59 | 29:38 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 44.4% |
| 2026-03-07 | Wichita St. | L 70–88 | 30:18 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 42.9% |
| 2026-03-01 | Charlotte | W 77–76 | 30:06 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-9 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 11.1% |
| 2026-02-22 | North Texas | L 72–73 | 20:39 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 38.9% |
| 2026-02-18 | UTSA | W 60–52 | 33:38 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-14 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-15 | South Fla. | L 81–83 | 34:23 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-11 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 40.9% |
| 2026-02-11 | Rice | L 73–81 | 35:13 | 22 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-11 | 2-4 | 6-7 | 72.7% |
| 2026-02-04 | Tulsa | L 76–78 | 30:53 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6-10 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 65.0% |
| 2026-02-01 | East Carolina | L 75–76 | 30:14 | 20 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7-14 | 3-8 | 3-4 | 60.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | Memphis | L 65–92 | 31:42 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4-13 | 2-4 | 7-9 | 38.5% |
| 2026-01-25 | South Fla. | L 75–89 | 30:16 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-21 | Tulane | W 79–74 | 31:21 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-12 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 70.8% |
| 2026-01-18 | Temple | W 79–73 | 27:01 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-10 | 0-4 | 3-6 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Wichita St. | W 85–67 | 26:11 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 3-5 | 93.8% |
| 2026-01-11 | Memphis | W 89–78 | 24:14 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | UAB | W 76–71 | 30:18 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-11 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 72.7% |
| 2026-01-04 | Tulane | L 66–69 | 32:42 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-10 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | UTSA | W 110–70 | 26:55 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5-10 | 2-4 | 4-5 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-23 | UCF | L 80–85 | 33:34 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-14 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 39.3% |
| 2025-12-19 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 75–88 | 32:31 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 4-8 | 45.8% |
| 2025-12-13 | UAlbany | W 105–79 | 23:00 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-9 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | FGCU | W 81–76 | 36:08 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-11 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | St. Bonaventure | L 65–70 | 23:19 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | George Mason | L 65–74 | 25:14 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-24 | LMU (CA) | W 76–65 | 22:52 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-20 | Pacific | W 82–59 | 24:27 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-7 | 3-5 | 4-5 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-09 | Liberty | L 68–88 | 26:09 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-6 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Col. of Charleston | W 94–77 | 26:59 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-03 | Boston College | W 83–78 | 28:01 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 55.6% |